- +2
George Perkovich, Jessica Tuchman Mathews, Joseph Cirincione, …
REQUIRED IMAGE
U.S. Nonproliferation Policy
Moves by North Korea to restart its nuclear reactor program and by Iran to build advanced nuclear facilities to produce weapons-grade materials, threaten to blow the lid off long-standing nonproliferation efforts. The developments show that the approach being pursued by the current administration for preventing the spread of nuclear arms has failed and needs immediate adjustment.
Moves by North Korea to restart its nuclear reactor program and by Iran to build advanced nuclear facilities to produce weapons-grade materials, threaten to blow the lid off long-standing nonproliferation efforts. The developments show that the approach being pursued by the current administration for preventing the spread of nuclear arms has failed and needs immediate adjustment.
While previous efforts to eliminate the threat of proliferation have not been entirely successful, efforts by the Bush administration have been counterproductive almost across the board. They have set back bilateral and multilateral efforts to prevent proliferation.
Failure in Korea
The most urgent case is that of North Korea. Despite its flaws, the 1994 bilateral agreement with the United States temporarily froze North Korea's nuclear plants and laid out a path to eliminate Pyongyang's nuclear capability without risk of war or regional instability. Likewise, before President Bush came to office, efforts to end the North's missile development and sales showed promise, even if much remained incomplete.
Now, after almost two years of harsh words and little engagement from the United States, North Korea has resumed its old game of brinkmanship to bring America back to the negotiating table.
Despite Pyongyang's pursuit of a secret uranium enrichment program in violation of its pledges, Washington could and should negotiate a broad, stringent and verifiable package deal that shuts down all of the North's nuclear facilities, missile production and sales in exchange for diplomatic recognition, a nonaggression pact and agricultural and economic assistance.
Had Bush embarked on such a path when he took office, North Korea's nuclear programs might have been eliminated by now. Instead, North Korea's program threatens to set off a proliferation arms race that could eventually engulf South Korea, Japan and Taiwan. Now, however, time is running out. There is a limited window to ensure that the Korean peninsula remains nuclear - free. If the Bush administration cannot produce results before North Korea reprocesses plutonium from its spent fuel, it may be impossible to rollback the North's nuclear capabilities.
Failure in Iran
In Iran, the scenario is equally challenging, if not quite as immediate. Tehran has announced that it is building facilities to both enrich uranium and produce plutonium, the two key ingredients for nuclear weapons. Iran has the international right under existing treaties to build the plants, provided they are under full international checks. But such monitoring would be worth little if weapons-grade materials were being produced in a country bent on acquiring nuclear arms.
By including Iran in its "axis of evil," the Bush administration has set back any potential to engage Iranian leaders to find alternatives to their nuclear ambitions. Instead, the United States has sought to pressure Russia not to provide Tehran with nuclear technology, with little success.
There have been no attempts to develop alternate ways to engage Iran or redirect its efforts to obtain nuclear weapons for what it asserts are legitimate security concerns. U.S. attempts to control sensitive exports to Iran and reduce its access to illicit nuclear technology would garner greater sympathy if they were combined with a more concerted policy to engage Iran. U.S. credibility on proliferation issues has also been greatly undercut by recent decisions to wink at Pakistan's illegal and dangerous transfers of uranium enrichment to North Korea and give all but official approval to North Korean missile sales to Yemen.
These decisions demonstrate to the rest of the world that the U.S. war on terrorism - in which Pakistan and Yemen are key American allies - takes precedence over the fight against proliferation. As a result, states bent on acquiring weapons of mass destruction may be in a position to play this preference to their advantage, as has Pakistan.
Time To Turn Around
With 2003 likely to bring increased tensions in regions of proliferation concern, including East and South Asia, and the Middle East, President Bush has little time to get an effective set of nonproliferation policies
place before the hot rhetoric of extremists in the administration leads to further failures.
The President needs to set a new direction, one that accepts and uses all available nonproliferation tools - not just tough talk and saber rattling. Foremost among the effective tools is direct diplomacy backed by international coordination.
As difficult and distasteful as some in the Bush administration may find negotiating with North Korea, such talks could yield quick and positive results that would advance U.S. security interests. Likewise, a new approach with America's European allies and Russia to engage Iran could yield useful results, or at least provide fresh ideas on how to redirect Iranian security efforts away from nuclear weapons.
In both cases, time is not on the side of those seeking to prevent the spread of nuclear arms. Unless new policies are adopted quickly, irreparable damage to global security and the international non-proliferation regime may result.
Jon Wolfsthal is the Deputy Director of the Non-Proliferation Project and co-author of Deadly Arsenals: Tracking Weapons of Mass Destruction.
About the Author
Former Nonresident Scholar, Nuclear Policy Program
Jon Wolfsthal was a nonresident scholar with the Nuclear Policy Program.
- Universal Compliance: A Strategy for Nuclear Security<br>With 2007 Report Card on ProgressReport
- 10 Plus 10 Doesn’t Add UpArticle
Jon Wolfsthal
Recent Work
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- Military Lessons from Operation SindoorArticle
The India-Pakistan conflict that played out between May 6 and May 10, 2025, offers several military lessons. This article presents key takeaways from Operation Sindoor and breaks down how India’s preparations shaped the outcome and what more is needed to strengthen future readiness.
Dinakar Peri
- A Tech Policy Planning Guide for India—Beyond the First 100 DaysResearch
This compendium provides an independent look at how to get the most out of India’s current technology ecosystem, and the measures that may need to be adopted or re-considered in order to build a lasting and enduring framework for policy changes in the select areas under the current administration.
- +5
Konark Bhandari, Ajay Kumar, Amlan Mohanty, …
- India Signs a Security of Supply Arrangement (SOSA) with the United States: What Can We Expect?Commentary
In August 2024, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) entered into a Security of Supply Arrangement (SOSA) with the Indian Ministry of Defence (MoD). This commentary attempts to highlight the issues that arise in the wake of the arrangement.
Konark Bhandari
- Understanding the Global Debate on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: An Indian PerspectiveArticle
This article explores the global debate on lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS), highlighting the convergences, complexities, and differences within and beyond the UN Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on LAWS. It further examines India’s key position at the GGE and the probable reasons behind them.
Charukeshi Bhatt, Tejas Bharadwaj
- On Thin Ice: Bhutan’s Diplomatic Challenge Amid the India-China Border DisputeCommentary
This piece examines the strategic implications of Bhutan’s diplomatic efforts amid its border dispute with China, highlighting the thin ice it walks on to achieve a resolution without compromising its vital relationships.
Shibani Mehta