Commentary
Yezid Sayigh
{
"authors": [
"Yezid Sayigh"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Levant",
"Syria",
"Middle East"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Syria: No Military Victory, No Political Solution?
The Friends of Syria have played what may be their last card. What difference will it make on the ground?
By Yezid Sayigh
Published on Jul 2, 2013
Source: openSecurity
JO TYABJI: I’m Jo Tyabji, editor of openSecurity, and today, I’m with Yezid Sayigh, who is a senior associate of the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut. Yezid, thank you so much for being with me.
TYABJI: We started this week with an urgent statement from the Friends of Syria in Qatar, saying that measures would be taken to get all material equipment to the rebels in Syria. To what extent does this represent a real escalation—a military escalation—or is there room for the status quo to pretty much continue?
YEZID SAYIGH: I think there’s a lot of room for the status quo to continue, with some change. In other words, I think the Friends of Syria will allow a certain flow of weapons to to go to the Syrian rebels—maybe still via allies in the region, such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Although the Obama administration approved in min-June the direct supply of American military assistance—lethal military assistance—to the rebels, but the key issue here, I think, is that the Friends of Syria, and especially the Western partners of the Friends of Syria, have spun out this whole thing for many months. They’ve waived the threat of supplying arms to the opposition, they’ve gone back and forth on it, they’ve threatened to do it, and then at the end of May, the European Union ended its embargo—or its total embargo in supplying weapons to Syria—in order to allow individual member-states to provide some sort of military assistance to the rebels.
SAYIGH: So what we have is a lot of gesturing, a lot of signaling to the Syrians and to the Russians. And I think this is because the Friends of Syria basically have run out of cards to play. They imposed sanctions—economic sanctions and financial sanctions and very painful ones in Syria—quite early in the crisis, in other words, in the beginning of 2012. And that was pretty much their only really effective option, short of going to the Security Council, which they tried, but that got blocked, of course, by Russia and China. They still don’t have the option of getting collective international sanctions from the United Nations, because the Russians and the Chinese are still committed to blocking that. So, this leaves the Friends of Syria really with very few choices.
About the Author
Yezid Sayigh
Senior Fellow, Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Yezid Sayigh is a senior fellow at the Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut, where he leads the program on Civil-Military Relations in Arab States (CMRAS). His work focuses on the comparative political and economic roles of Arab armed forces, the impact of war on states and societies, the politics of postconflict reconstruction and security sector transformation in Arab transitions, and authoritarian resurgence.
- What Is Israel’s Plan in Lebanon?
- All or Nothing in GazaCommentary
Yezid Sayigh
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- A Geographic and Social Reconfiguration in LebanonCommentary
Israel is encroaching on the country’s territory, while the Lebanese look askance at one another.
Issam Kayssi
- Pushing Beirut into an Armed Conflict With Hezbollah Is InsaneCommentary
The party’s domestic and regional roles have changed, so Lebanon should devise a disarmament strategy that encompasses this.
Michael Young
- Why Does the Middle East Suffer “Forever Wars”?Commentary
Because perpetual conflict enhances control, offers economic benefits, and allows leaders to ignore popular preferences.
Angie Omar
- Smuggling and Civil Peace on Lebanon’s Border: The Case of SummaqiyyehArticle
The Lebanese authorities’ clampdown on illicit cross-border activity threatens to leave inhabitants of the historically neglected village, and the wider Akkar region, in an economically precarious position.
Mohanad Hage Ali
- How Lebanon’s Sunnis Approach Peace With IsraelCommentary
The community seeks maintain a distance from Hezbollah, and an even greater one from normalization with their southern neighbor.
Mohamad Fawaz
