• Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Middle East logoCarnegie lettermark logo
PalestineSyria
{
  "authors": [
    "Constantino Xavier"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "Western Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Democracy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Views From India

India and the EU are now discovering common ground and aligning strategies on how to achieve sustainable development in an open society and on how to ensure security through a rules-based global order.

Link Copied
By Constantino Xavier
Published on Dec 19, 2016

Source: Progressive Post

The world’s two largest democracies are now discovering common ground and aligning strategies on how to achieve sustainable development in an open society and on how to ensure security through a rules-based global order.

However, beyond pretty words emphasizing their shared commitment to democracy, behind the scenes India and the EU often exchanged ugly punches throughout the 2000s. For example, while Brussels harped on about the need for climate change mitigation or 48-hour working weeks, New Delhi kept invoking its right to pollute the environment and disregard labor rights to reclaim its pre-colonial levels of economic wealth. In the name of democracy promotion, Europeans also jumped on the United States’ liberal interventionist bandwagons to pressure Myanmar and Sri Lanka, even while keeping mum on military rule in India’s other neighbouring country, Pakistan.

A stage of mutual confidence

Fortunately, the phase of mutual recriminations has finally ended and the EU-India mantra is now all about exploring the current “momentum.” Sujata Mehta, New Delhi’s top official in charge of Europe, thus recently noted that relations have reached a “stage of mutual confidence and maturity where we see the big picture similarly or when not, we can exchange perspectives on the big picture.” Four broad developments have created this window of opportunity and will keep it wide open.

First, the impact of the 2009 recession and this year’s Brexit nudged both sides into a more frank engagement. India no longer takes the EU for granted and recognizes that its own economic prospects depend on the continued growth and internal stability of its largest trading partner. The EU, on the other hand, can no longer afford the luxury of exceptionalist idealism. Its new Global Strategy thus pivots around “principled pragmatism” and underlines the “direct connection between European prosperity and Asian security.”

Second, turbulence in the Middle East (or West Asia) has incentivized a greater EU-India security dialogue on their shared extended neighbourhood that stretches from Istanbul to Islamabad and from Moscow to Mauritius. This greater arc of Eurasian instability is of critical importance to New Delhi and Brussels’ aspirations to become net security providers and help stabilize their peripheral regions. Whether on stemming refugee inflows, countering piracy and radicalization, developing conflict resolution mechanisms or assisting in democratic transitions, the EU and India are on a converging path towards security cooperation.

Third, the formidable rise of China is swiftly altering the balance of power in the Eurasian heartland. Beijing has pumped more than fifty billion Euros worth of investments into the EU since 2000 and developed new initiatives such as the 16+1 Multilateral in Eastern Europe and the One Belt, One Road (OBOR) strategy. Despite its ongoing rapprochement to the United States, India will not want to place all its eggs into Washington’s basket and is therefore also reaching out to Brussels to diversify its options and counter-balance China’s European offensive. Similarly, the EU is also bound to realise the costs of excessive dependence on China and, conversely, focus on the potential returns of developing India as an alternative Asian partner, especially in the Indian Ocean region. By roping in New Delhi, Brussels will also increase its chances of normalising with Moscow and Tehran.

Cooperation for sustainable development

Finally, there is also the increasing realisation that the EU and India’s shared commitment to democratic governance can facilitate cooperation practically. India now recognizes the value of European expertise in crafting regulations, standards and scientific benchmarks to achieve sustainable development in an open society with competing interests, the rule of law, and an assertive civil society. On the external front, as the world’s two largest democratic systems, the EU and India also have similar stakes in preserving an open, liberal, and multilateral order that underpins several regimes, from free trade and cybersecurity to nuclear non-proliferation and freedom of navigation.

In stark contrast with China, India’s foreign and security policies are therefore in harmony with the “vital interests” that underpin the EU’s external action, as defined in its recent Global Strategy: “peace and security, prosperity, democracy and a rules-based global order.” Beyond a mere leap of democratic faith, Brussels and New Delhi will have to focus on these cardinal principles to explore the current window of opportunity for greater EU-India convergence.

This article was originally published in the Progressive Post.

About the Author

Constantino Xavier

Former Fellow, Carnegie India

Constantino Xavier was a fellow at Carnegie India, based in New Delhi. His research focus is on India’s foreign policy, with emphasis on relations with its neighboring countries and South Asian regional security.

    Recent Work

  • Paper
    Bridging the Bay of Bengal: Toward a Stronger BIMSTEC

      Constantino Xavier

  • Paper
    India’s Expatriate Evacuation Operations: Bringing the Diaspora Home

      Constantino Xavier

Constantino Xavier
Former Fellow, Carnegie India
Constantino Xavier
Foreign PolicyDemocracySouth AsiaIndiaWestern Europe

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Iran and the New Geopolitical Moment

    A coalition of states is seeking to avert a U.S. attack, and Israel is in the forefront of their mind.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Baku Proceeds With Caution as Ethnic Azeris Join Protests in Neighboring Iran

    Baku may allow radical nationalists to publicly discuss “reunification” with Azeri Iranians, but the president and key officials prefer not to comment publicly on the protests in Iran.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Iran’s Woes Aren’t Only Domestic

    The country’s leadership is increasingly uneasy about multiple challenges from the Levant to the South Caucasus.

      Armenak Tokmajyan

  • A municipal employee raises the US flag among those of other nations in Sharm el-Sheikh, as the Egyptian Red Sea resort town gets ready to receive international leaders, following a Gaza ceasefire agreement, on October 11, 2025.
    Article
    The Tragedy of Middle Eastern Politics

    The countries of the region have engaged in sustained competition that has tested their capacities and limitations, while resisting domination by rivals. Can a more stable order emerge from this maelstrom, and what would it require?

      • Mohamed Ali Adraoui

      Hamza Meddeb, Mohamed Ali Adraoui

  • Paper
    The United States and the Emerging Security Order in Eastern Syria

    As Washington reduces its presence in the country, the success of its withdrawal and continued containment of the Islamic State will hinge on adopting an approach of flexible oversight built around three priorities, as well as balancing Turkish and Israeli red lines.

      Kheder Khaddour, Issam Kayssi

Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Carnegie Middle East logo, white
  • Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.