• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Vadim Dubnov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Carnegie Politika",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Caucasus"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy",
    "Domestic Politics"
  ]
}
Attribution logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Politika

Is a Power Transition in the Cards in Chechnya?

Ramzan Kadyrov treats his unique relationship with the Kremlin as a sort of family crest. His status may be less and less special, but the Chechen leader has an image to maintain.

Link Copied
By Vadim Dubnov
Published on Apr 4, 2023
Carnegie Politika

Blog

Carnegie Politika

Carnegie Politika is a digital publication that features unmatched analysis and insight on Russia, Ukraine and the wider region. For nearly a decade, Carnegie Politika has published contributions from members of Carnegie’s global network of scholars and well-known outside contributors and has helped drive important strategic conversations and policy debates.

Learn More

When Russian President Vladimir Putin met in March with Akhmad Kadyrov, the seventeen-year-old son of the controversial Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov, many saw it as a signal of an impending power transition in the southern Russian republic. This perception was strengthened by rumors that the Chechen leader had serious kidney problems. A closer look at the state of affairs in Chechnya, however, offers no grounds to expect such a profound change. 

The claim about Kadyrov’s ill health originates with his émigré rival Akhmed Zakayev, who is hardly a credible source. No other sources have confirmed that information, and there are no signs that Kadyrov’s political trajectory is about to change course. Given his appalling track record on human rights, even the most horrifying developments have now become the norm in Chechnya, and the situation there appears stable.

The Chechen government remains centered around the supreme leader, while its economic model is still based on an enormous cash-out scheme established in the early 2000s, following two brutal wars fought by separatists in the Muslim-majority republic against the federal center. In the aftermath of the Second Chechen War, the Chechen authorities rebuilt the region using mostly the money they collected from local businesses or held back from state employees’ salaries. Chechen officials then submitted vastly inflated reconstruction costs to Moscow. The Finance Ministry was perfectly cognizant of the ruse and allocated far lower amounts than requested, but the final payout was still much greater than the actual costs, which satisfied everyone.

Several years ago, Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov legitimized this scheme by publicly admitting that Chechnya was financed differently than other regions: that the federal government allocated money to Chechnya based on the republic’s spending. As a result, some experts estimate that over 80 percent of Chechen expenditure is subsidized by Moscow (even the officially acknowledged number was forty-eight percent in 2020).

In any event, Kadyrov no longer publicly berates federal agencies over inadequate subsidies, as he was doing five years ago. Effectively, nothing has changed, but Chechnya no longer triggers accusations of “overfeeding” the Caucasus region. Moscow has long wanted to portray Chechnya as a regular Russian region, and is steadily moving toward that goal.

The composition of the Chechen ruling elite also remains unchanged. At its core are Chechen war veterans who ultimately followed Akhmad Kadyrov—Ramzan’s father and predecessor—and switched sides to join Moscow. They have almost nothing to lose, since the only person able to take anything from them is Ramzan Kadyrov himself.

The outer layer of the system is made up of technocrats skilled at budgetary issues, among other things. These people are not part of Kadyrov’s inner circle, nor are they too eager to join it, lest they incur the leader’s wrath. 

Members of the inner circle bear numerous grudges against each other and use immunity bestowed on them by Kadyrov to settle old scores. This infighting was likely responsible for the recent attempted poisoning of Chechen military commander Apti Alaudinov, who is currently fighting in the Donbas. 

Anyone who ends up taking control of the current Chechen power system would face a choice of adopting it to their needs or reforming it. There is no one right now who would do either—not even among those close to Kadyrov—and Moscow is hardly likely to want to break a working system. This is especially true at a time when Russia is fighting a war against Ukraine, when nobody knows what might happen next. In short, Kadyrov has no reason to leave, and the Kremlin has no reason to replace him. 

Looking into the reasons for Putin’s personal meeting with Kadyrov’s adolescent son, it’s worth recalling that when Kadyrov’s father Akhmad pledged his loyalty to Moscow, he insisted on talking with Putin directly: no intermediaries. That was the price the Kremlin paid for getting the Kadyrovs to switch sides. The same formula remained in effect when Ramzan Kadyrov came to power, his father Akhmad having been assassinated in 2004.

The Kremlin-Kadyrov symbiosis later weakened, but never disappeared. Ramzan Kadyrov has always believed exclusive federal status to be essential to his political existence. Unlike other regional leaders, he sought horizontal rather than vertical relations with the Kremlin, even if they were merely in the form of declarations.

This condition has been a permanent fixture of his contract with the Kremlin, no matter what else changed. In fact, Kadyrov has become a regional leader of federal stature, even as Putin reined in all the other provincial executives.

In reality, Kadyrov’s status is gradually becoming not so special, but the Chechen leader treats his unique relationship with the Kremlin as a sort of family crest, and needs to maintain his image as having a privileged status. He is quite content with this symbolic asset, and does not in fact harbor the far-reaching ambitions his speeches might sometimes suggest. 

He simply seeks to protect his domain, knowing how short his political life will be without Putin. He is therefore quite sincere in describing himself as Putin’s foot soldier. Meanwhile, other decisionmakers—especially those in military uniform—are still his enemies.

Kadyrov’s lack of allies forces him to search for ways to affirm his exclusivity, and the war in Ukraine is very helpful in this respect, allowing him to expand his influence horizontally rather than vertically. Military and police detachments deployed in Chechnya are formally part of the ministries of defense and internal affairs, but they effectively answer to Kadyrov. He also took advantage of protests organized by mothers of Chechen draftees to the war in Ukraine to take control of the mobilization campaign in his region.

In this context, the much-hyped alliance between Kadyrov and the Wagner mercenary group founder Yevgeny Prigozhin is a purely ad hoc arrangement, since their objectives are very different. Wagner and the war in Ukraine offer Prigozhin an opportunity to strengthen his positions within the Kremlin elite. Kadyrov, on the other hand, wants to be as autonomous as possible from that elite in order to retain at least a degree of exclusivity in his relationship with Putin.

Interestingly, the Chechen head has talked about founding his own private military company upon retirement. If the Chechen republic does ever require a new leader, Kadyrov could assume some other position of power, and may well have use for a private army.

But Chechnya is not ready for a new ruler just yet. The meeting between Putin and Akhmad Kadyrov only strengthens the current head of the republic’s position by effectively recognizing his family political clan. Putin isn’t willing to offer Kadyrov anything more than exclusivity, and that’s also all Kadyrov happens to want right now.

About the Author

Vadim Dubnov

Vadim Dubnov
Vadim Dubnov
Political ReformEconomyDomestic PoliticsRussiaCaucasus

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Politika

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    After Ilia II: What Will a New Patriarch Mean for Georgia?

    The front-runner to succeed Ilia II, Metropolitan Shio, is prone to harsh anti-Western rhetoric and frequent criticism of “liberal ideologies” that he claims threaten the Georgian state. This raises fears that under his leadership the Georgian Orthodox Church will lose its unifying role and become an instrument of ultraconservative ideology.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

    The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

    The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    “Mr. Nobody Against Putin”: A Deep Dive Into Russian Propaganda

    Talankin and Borenstein’s documentary is a unique inside look at a regime that threatens the world and has killed thousands of people in its neighboring country. And many critics and general viewers alike draw parallels between the Putin regime and their own governments.

      Ekaterina Barabash

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Did Messaging App Telegram Fall From Grace in Russia?

    The history of Telegram’s relations with the Russian state offers a salutary lesson for international platforms that believe they can reach a compromise with the Kremlin.

      Maria Kolomychenko

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.