• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Andrey Pertsev"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Carnegie Politika",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Caucasus"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy",
    "Domestic Politics"
  ]
}
Attribution logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Politika

The Best Laid Plans: Putin’s Rogue Election Announcement

The president’s inclination to ignore his administration and act upon his own initiative is damaging to both himself and the power vertical he created.

Link Copied
By Andrey Pertsev
Published on Dec 13, 2023
Carnegie Politika

Blog

Carnegie Politika

Carnegie Politika is a digital publication that features unmatched analysis and insight on Russia, Ukraine and the wider region. For nearly a decade, Carnegie Politika has published contributions from members of Carnegie’s global network of scholars and well-known outside contributors and has helped drive important strategic conversations and policy debates.

Learn More

The Kremlin’s domestic policy bloc had carefully prepared a choice of platforms for President Vladimir Putin to announce that he would run for a fifth presidential term, and all of them were deliberately far removed from the war. Russians are tired of the topic of war, and announcing his candidacy at a decidedly nonmilitary event would have created the illusion of stability and a prevailing mood of calm. Putin, however, apparently had other ideas, and chose instead to confirm he would run at a military awards ceremony—and in response to a request from a former commander from the annexed war-torn Donbas region, no less. 

Putin confirmed he would run again in the 2024 presidential election following a Kremlin ceremony on December 8 to award the title of Hero of Russia. His comments were made in reply to an impassioned plea from Artyom Zhoga, a former military commander who fought in Ukraine’s Donbas region and is now speaker of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic parliament.

Footage of Putin’s mumbled confirmation did not appear in the media straight away, and when it finally surfaced, it only strengthened the impression that the painfully obviously staged request and response had been put together in a rush, which is hardly in keeping with the Kremlin’s statements about the historical significance of the upcoming vote. Zhoga visibly struggled to get his question out as other participants in the awards ceremony crowded around him and Putin to shake hands with the president, clearly unaware that something important was happening right in front of them.

This disorderly haste is especially surprising, given that the parts of the presidential administration responsible for domestic policy and PR had been busy preparing several possible platforms for Putin’s nomination as a candidate that were more in keeping with the status of a “historic event.” The political bloc’s preference was for the gigantic “Russia” exhibition and forum currently being held at Moscow’s VDNKh pavilion complex. Back in the summer, there were media reports that Putin would announce his candidature at its opening on November 4, amid a grandiose display of his virtual achievements. In the end, however, Putin did not even attend the opening of the exhibition. 

Another option was his Direct Line phone-in with members of the public and press conference, scheduled for December 14. The merger of the two formats (previously separate affairs) has added to the event’s gravitas. The optics would also have been good: a “representative of the people”—a public sector employee, worker, or even a businessman—could have implored Putin to run again, and the president would have graciously acquiesced. 

It’s hardly news, of course, that Putin will run again. Any remaining doubts were dispelled when the constitution was altered in 2020 to “reset the clock” on his presidential terms, overcoming a previous ban on holding office for more than two consecutive terms. Announcing his candidacy at the exhibition or during the phone-in were supposed to offset this predictability by turning it into something of an event.

It would appear that the initiative to divert away from the planned scenario came from Putin himself. Given his KGB background, the president does not like it when his plans are known in advance, since that may give ill-wishers (both foreign and domestic) the chance to use those plans against him. But since Putin’s “enemies” had no illusions about him running for election, this chaotic smokescreen was entirely unnecessary. 

This isn’t the first time the president has gone rogue. In 2017, the Kremlin’s political bloc planned for him to announce he would run again during an appearance at a volunteer forum. A duly briefed participant even asked the corresponding question, but did not receive an answer from the president. Instead, Putin announced his campaign at the anniversary celebrations of the GAZ automobile plant. 

Previously, Putin listened to his political advisers. But now he is the problematic type of candidate who prefers to be their own strategist. These politicians still hire professionals for some reason, but then insist on coming up with the key elements of their campaign themselves in the belief that they know what voters want. This approach tends to generate unsuccessful slogans, ideas, and PR formats, which interfere with campaigning. Putin’s semi-spontaneous announcement will also make it difficult for his staff to maintain interest in the “Russia” exhibition and the phone-in. 

There will always be people in the president’s entourage who are prepared to humor his whims. In this case, that person was apparently Andrei Turchak, head of the ruling party United Russia, who is closely involved in military affairs and has known Zhoga for a long time. 

The bumpy start to Putin’s campaign will not affect the election results, of course. Over the course of several years, the political bloc has fine-tuned the corporate mobilization machine, which is now also supported by electronic voting and three-day elections. But it will certainly be harder to create the required mood of optimism among voters. 

Putin chose a military awards ceremony as his platform, and Zhoga made the request on the behalf of “our Donbas.” Yet ordinary Russians are clearly tired of the war. According to recent polls, more people in Russia are now in favor of entering into peace talks than want to continue the hostilities. 

Announcing his intention to run at a “peaceful” event would have projected the message that everything was stable, that Russia has nothing to fear from war and sanctions. But the president decided otherwise. 

In addition, by agreeing to a request “from the Donbas,” Putin touched on another sore point. Surveyed Russians readily say that more than enough funds are being allocated for the reconstruction of Donbas infrastructure (53 percent of respondents), or even “excessive” amounts (a far from insignificant 28 percent). Putin’s focus on the annexed Ukrainian territory is directly at odds with such sentiment. 

The domestic policy bloc will have to somehow soften the consequences of Putin taking matters into his own hands. That won’t be easy, since the Kremlin had deliberately talked up the “historical significance” of the moment. Now that hype needs to be dialed back down, and First Deputy Chief of Staff Sergei Kiriyenko’s political bloc has already begun work. 

Putin will officially be nominated as a presidential candidate (a requirement for those running as independents) by a committee of voters in Moscow’s Zaryadye concert hall on December 16. Officials must accordingly now start work on preparing that event, on top of all the previously planned events—not least the phone-in on December 14. 

The president’s inclination to act upon his own initiative is increasingly ruining the plans of his administration. His actions are out of touch with reality, and are damaging to both himself and the power vertical he created. 

The unofficial announcement involving Zhoga will not have critical consequences, but it shows that the president is ready to derail carefully laid plans at the most inopportune moment. In the event of plans related to war or the economy, such interference could have far more serious consequences.

About the Author

Andrey Pertsev

Andrey Pertsev is a journalist with Meduza website.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced Voting

      Andrey Pertsev

  • Commentary
    Why Is the Kremlin Punishing Pro-War Russian Bloggers?

      Andrey Pertsev

Andrey Pertsev

Andrey Pertsev is a journalist with Meduza website.

Andrey Pertsev
Political ReformEconomyDomestic PoliticsRussiaCaucasus

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Politika

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    After Ilia II: What Will a New Patriarch Mean for Georgia?

    The front-runner to succeed Ilia II, Metropolitan Shio, is prone to harsh anti-Western rhetoric and frequent criticism of “liberal ideologies” that he claims threaten the Georgian state. This raises fears that under his leadership the Georgian Orthodox Church will lose its unifying role and become an instrument of ultraconservative ideology.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

    The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

    The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    “Mr. Nobody Against Putin”: A Deep Dive Into Russian Propaganda

    Talankin and Borenstein’s documentary is a unique inside look at a regime that threatens the world and has killed thousands of people in its neighboring country. And many critics and general viewers alike draw parallels between the Putin regime and their own governments.

      Ekaterina Barabash

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Did Messaging App Telegram Fall From Grace in Russia?

    The history of Telegram’s relations with the Russian state offers a salutary lesson for international platforms that believe they can reach a compromise with the Kremlin.

      Maria Kolomychenko

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.