Commentary
The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.
Andrey Pertsev
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Democracy"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Press Release
Press Release: Understanding the Upcoming Elections in Kuwait
Published on Jun 22, 2006
For Immediate Release: June 22, 2006
Contact: Jennifer Linker, 202/939-2372, jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org
Kuwaitis will go to the polls on June 29, 2006 to determine only one matter: who will represent them in the country’s 50-member parliament. While weak by global standards, Kuwait’s parliament is the most powerful elected body on the Arabian peninsula and one of the strongest in the region. The elections have drawn little international attention, yet the poll could have deep implications for the future of the Arabian peninsula’s most democratic political system. Senior Associate Nathan Brown and Junior Fellow Dina Bishara of Carnegie’s Middle East Program elucidate the important factors in Kuwait’s elections in a new web-only commentary, Kuwaitis Vote for a New Parliament...And Maybe a New Electoral System.
Brown and Bishara argue that while this year’s voting may seem routine—other than two interruptions, Kuwait has had regular parliamentary elections since independence—the 2006 parliamentary elections have two striking features.
• First, they are occasioned by an intense controversy over the size of electoral districts—a technical matter with significant implications for Kuwaiti political life.
• Second, in this dispute, liberals and Islamists are very much on the same side—a rare alliance in the region, and unusual even in Kuwait.
The authors examine these two anomalies and how the dispute over the size of electoral districts and suspicions about the government’s commitment to political reform led Kuwait’s emboldened opposition to take measures that led to the dissolution of parliament and the holding of early elections.
An uneasy alliance between liberal and Islamists will attempt to redress what they regard as the single most important impediment to political reform in Kuwait. Long on the agenda of the Kuwaiti opposition, electoral reform is seen as the gateway to a serious political reform process and the prerequisite for the institution of a formal party system.
For more resources, please go to www.CarnegieEndowment.org/MiddleEast.
Nathan Brown is a senior associate in the Middle East Program at the Carnegie Endowment, and co-author of the Carnegie Paper Islamist Movements and the Democratic Process in the Arab World: Exploring Gray Zones. Dina Bishara is a junior fellow in Carnegie’s Middle East Program.
If you have received this release in error, please send a message to info@CarnegieEndowment.org
###
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced Voting
- Notes From Kyiv: Is Ukraine Preparing for Elections?Commentary
As discussions about settlement and elections move from speculation to preparation, Kyiv will have to manage not only the battlefield, but also the terms of political transition. The thaw will not resolve underlying tensions; it will only expose them more clearly.
Balázs Jarábik
- Once Neutral on the Ukraine War, Arab States Increasingly Favor MoscowCommentary
Disillusioned with the West over Gaza, Arab countries are not only trading more with Russia; they are also more willing to criticize Kyiv.
Ruslan Suleymanov
- Where Does the Split in the Ruling Tandem Leave Kyrgyzstan?Commentary
Despite its reputation as an island of democracy in Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan appears to be on the brink of becoming a personalist autocracy.
Temur Umarov
- In Uzbekistan, the President’s Daughter Is Now His Second-in-CommandCommentary
Having failed to build a team that he can fully trust or establish strong state institutions, Mirziyoyev has become reliant on his family.
Galiya Ibragimova
