• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Press Release: Economic Reform Efforts in Jordan Lack Critical Support

Link Copied
Published on Aug 8, 2007

August 8, 2007

Jordan's King Abdullah II has stated that economic reform is one of his top priorities, yet it remains hindered by two major obstacles: a lack of public support, and the government's inability to implement deep reform.

In Rethinking Economic Reform in Jordan: Confronting Socioeconomic Realities, Sufyan Alissa argues that the general public is skeptical about reforms because previous efforts failed to address the major social and economic problems affecting the majority of its citizens. Likewise, reform efforts face severe resistance from elites who benefit from the status quo.

Key Findings:  

  • Initiated under severe economic crisis conditions, the reform process in Jordan has been slow, selective, and uncoordinated. Jordan has stabilized its economy and engaged in a process of trade and financial liberalization and privatization, but has failed to find long-lasting solutions to the major social and economic challenges facing it. Informal safety nets have helped Jordanians cope with rising prices and reduced the impact of poverty and unemployment, delaying a stronger push for deep economic reform.

  • Jordan needs to confront its major social and economic realities, including poverty, unemployment, public debt, and high dependency on foreign aid. Failure to address these challenges may pose a real threat to social and political stability in the country, especially given the political frustration linked to unresolved problems in the region such as the Arab–Israeli conflict and the war on Iraq.

  • The design and implementation of economic reforms are generally limited to the ruling elite. Given the high turnover in Jordan's government, there is little incentive for it to implement controversial reforms. Young elites who champion reform are often disconnected from the socioeconomic realities the population faces, and as such, lack public support for their efforts.

  • Civil society, political parties, and unions in Jordan are weak, and their role in supporting or blocking reform is limited. Hence the state did not perceive these groups as influential stakeholders to be considered in the process of designing and introducing reform measures.

  • The international donor community should support deeper reform and sustainable and equitable growth. They should give more attention to building institutional capacity and social safety net, and should develop more programs for poor communities and to empower the youth.

“ Jordan faces key social and economic challenges, but these challenges have not yet reached the breaking point,” writes Sufyan Alissa. “The impact of such challenges on the social and economic conditions of the populations and the political stability of Jordan has been cushioned by current availability of external rents—namely remittances from abroad and foreign aid—and economic and political manipulation by the regime.”

Notes:

  1. To read this Carnegie Paper, go to www.carnegieendowment.org/middleeast
    Direct link to the PDF: www.carnegieendowment.org/files/cmec4_alissa_jordan_final.pdf
    Direct link to the Arabic translation: www.carnegieendowment.org/programs/arabic/jordan_august07.pdf

  2. Sufyan Alissa is an associate at the Carnegie Endowment's Middle East Center. An economist and specialist on Middle Eastern affairs, he previously served at Nuffield College-University of Oxford, the School of Oriental and African Studies-University of London and City University in London. He worked as a consultant for many international institutions, including the International Labor Organization and United Nations Development Program. He received his PhD from SOAS, University of London.

  3. This Carnegie Paper is part of a larger series assessing economic reform efforts in seven countries in the Arab world. Over the next two years, Carnegie scholars will analyze and report on a diverse selection of countries in hopes of generating conclusions for economic reform in the Arab world as a whole.

  4. To request an interview with Sufyan Alissa, please contact Trent Perrotto, 202/939-2372, tperrotto@ceip.org

  5. The Carnegie Middle East Center is a public policy research center based in Beirut, Lebanon, and established by the Carnegie Endowment in 2006.

  6. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is a private, nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cooperation between nations and promoting active international engagement by the United States. Founded in 1910, its work is nonpartisan and dedicated to achieving practical results. The Endowment has added operations in Beijing, Beirut, and Brussels to its longstanding offices in Washington and Moscow as part of its transformation into the first global think tank.
EconomyTradeMiddle East

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

    The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

    The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Paper
    A Tight Spot: Challenges Facing the Russian Oil Sector Through 2035

    Russian oil production is remarkably resilient to significant price changes, but significant political headwinds may lead to a drop regardless of economics.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Georgia’s Fall From U.S. Favor Heralds South Caucasus Realignment

    With the White House only interested in economic dealmaking, Georgia finds itself eclipsed by what Armenia and Azerbaijan can offer.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Once Neutral on the Ukraine War, Arab States Increasingly Favor Moscow

    Disillusioned with the West over Gaza, Arab countries are not only trading more with Russia; they are also more willing to criticize Kyiv.  

      Ruslan Suleymanov

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.