• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Press Release: China Should Raise Interest Rates to Avoid Looming Inflation Crisis, Says New Report

The Chinese government must move quickly and dramatically to increase interest rates to reduce the risk of an inflation crisis.

Link Copied
Published on Sep 13, 2007

WASHINGTON, Sept 13—The Chinese government must move quickly and dramatically to increase interest rates to reduce the risk of an inflation crisis, says a new policy brief from the Carnegie Endowment.  Albert Keidel, an expert on China’s economy, urges the Chinese government to avoid the danger of  harsh corrective steps which in the past caused severe declines in GDP growth, fueled deadly urban civil unrest throughout the country, and brought long-lasting damage to China’s international reputation.

In China’s Looming Crisis—Inflation Returns, Keidel argues that political disputes between competing interests groups could hold up adjustments to China’s government-administered interest rates.  A delayed response could be dangerous, however, as both public and corporate bank deposits are already losing purchasing power.  Value-losing deposit rates in the late 1980s and mid 1990s sparked heavy bank withdrawals and accelerated consumer spending—pushing inflationary pressures to the crisis point.

Key Recommendations:

  • The Chinese government should raise key deposit rates or index them to future inflation to avoid moderate price rises leading to an inflation-driven panic.

     
  • The Chinese government should enable farm diversification by increasing wheat and rice imports.  This would contain future food price inflation and realize higher potential farmer productivity.

     
  • The growing risk of an inflationary storm further confirms that China’s growth and inflation are domestically driven.  U.S. government analysts need to take this opportunity to correct the popular misperception that Chinese growth is export-led—it is not. The nature of this inflation and the results of other recent in-depth research show that market demand behind China’s sustained growth is not subject to vagaries of international demand. U.S. commercial, diplomatic, and military thinking regarding China’s commercial behavior and long-term prospects needs to shift to account for this conclusion.

"The next fifteen months will be especially crucial for China. Foreign criticism has already been severe, thanks to imbroglios over food and toy safety, dollar-holding scares, and Olympics-related activism,” writes Keidel.  “U.S. political players are all sharpening their anti-China claws for the 2008 elections.  Brutal suppression of inflation-related domestic dissent would harden already negative U.S. attitudes governing commerce, sanctions, strategic contingencies, and military spending.”

###
 


Notes:

  • To read this report, go to www.carnegieendowment.org/programs/china
      Direct link to the PDF:
    www.carnegieendowment.org/files/pb54_keidel_china_looming_crisis_final.pdf

     
  • Albert Keidel is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment, where he specializes in Chinese economic issues and related U.S. policy.  He formerly served as deputy director and acting director at the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of East Asian Nations. Before that, he was senior economist at the World Bank office in Beijing. He gratefully acknowledges generous Ford Foundation support for research underpinning this policy brief; the opinions and conclusions were generated solely by the author.

     
  • The Carnegie China Program provides policy makers in China and the United States with a better understanding of the dynamics in China and in U.S.-China relations. In late 2005, the Carnegie Endowment finalized an agreement with the China Reform Forum, a leading Chinese think tank, to set up a joint Beijing Program on globalization and international relations in China.  The mission of the joint program is to advance research in the impact of globalization on foreign policy making and promote scholarly exchange between the United States and China.

     
  • The Carnegie China Program has a number of online resources to communicate its research findings and policy insights to both governmental and non-governmental audiences in China, the United States, and around the globe. ChinaNet, our Chinese-language website, features international affairs content produced in Chinese and translated from Carnegie publications, including Foreign Policy magazine. The material includes articles on economics, Chinese social and political change, Chinese foreign policy, and U.S.-China relations, often not available from any other source in China. The China Program also produces Carnegie China Insight Monthly, a Chinese-language e-newsletter. The Hong Kong Journal, an online quarterly edited by Robert Keatley, former editor of the Asian Wall Street Journal, covers political, economic, and social issues on Hong Kong and its relations with mainland China, the United States, and other governments and international organizations.

     
  • Reframing China Policy: The Carnegie Debates: The series aims to candidly discuss the most pressing issues in U.S.-China relations and to provide the most authoritative information possible to those on Capitol Hill who are shaping U.S. foreign policy. Since its inception in Fall 2006, the China Program has hosted six debates on the most critical—and controversial—issues involving China’s economic, political-social, and military evolution and their policy implications. 
EconomyTradeChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

    The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

    The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Paper
    A Tight Spot: Challenges Facing the Russian Oil Sector Through 2035

    Russian oil production is remarkably resilient to significant price changes, but significant political headwinds may lead to a drop regardless of economics.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Are China and Russia Not Rushing to Help Iran?

    Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.   

      • Alexander Gabuev

      Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Georgia’s Fall From U.S. Favor Heralds South Caucasus Realignment

    With the White House only interested in economic dealmaking, Georgia finds itself eclipsed by what Armenia and Azerbaijan can offer.

      Bashir Kitachaev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.