• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Rachel Chan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Taiwan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

In The Media

Continuity in Store for Future U.S.-Taiwan-China Relations: Paal

The triangular relationship between the United States, Taiwan, and China is likely to continue on a stable trajectory as all sides try to avoid unnecessary friction and emphasize cooperation.

Link Copied
By Rachel Chan
Published on Oct 16, 2009

Source: Central News Agency

Continuity in Store for Future U.S.-Taiwan-China RDouglas Paal, former director of the American Institute in Taiwan, said Friday in Taipei that "continuity" will characterize prospects for the short-term strategic paths of the United States, Taiwan and China.

The proposition was reinforced by last year's election of a Taiwan administration that seeks to eschew unnecessary friction with China and seek areas of cooperation with Beijing, according to Paal.

He said Taiwan has at least two and a half years to seek success with its approach, and Beijing still appears willing to cooperate, though always with a wary eye to the downside risks.

Paal, who is now vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said at the seminar titled Taipei- Washington-Beijing Relations under the Ma and Obama Administrations" that both China and the U.S. are also likely to continue their current tactics.

He said China's direction, economically and otherwise, appears to enjoy what passes for a consensus on the mainland, while the U.S., under the new Obama administration, is actively seeking to accentuate the positive with Beijing.

Obama has identified the financial crisis, climate change, and non-proliferation as his key themes and has been seeking and initially obtaining Chinese cooperation in these areas, he added.

Paal also argued that Obama would undoubtedly like to see Taiwan shoulder an appropriate share of the burden of its own necessary defense.

"Indications are that his (Obama's) administration will assess Taiwan's requests with an eye to the actual situation rather than just the statements of China's leaders," Paal said.

"The friction that could result should be manageable within the broader positive context in U.S.-China relations, and in Taiwan's own efforts to avoid clumsily treading on sensitivities and to seek common interests," he added.

In the long term, Paal said whether the U.S., Taiwan, and China will change their strategic courses will depend on three factors that include the ability of the Ma Ying-jeou administration to demonstrate to Taiwan's voters that his policies are worth continuing.

The other two factors are China's avoidance of a domestic crisis, driven by factors such as a financial collapse, a failure to stimulate domestic consumption, or an embarrassing international setback; and America's readjustment of its economic trajectory from a capital importing to a capital exporting country, the downsizing of its international exposure to conflict, and fiscal responsibility, he added.

"These are significant threats, if now remote, to the positive sum game the triangular relationship has entered. The emergence of a significant change in any one of them will have a negative impact on the other two," Paal said.

About the Author

Rachel Chan

Rachel Chan
Foreign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaChinaTaiwan

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Does Central Europe’s Post-Orban Russia Policy Look Like?

    Though Orban is gone, Putin can still count on some like-minded individuals in Central and Eastern Europe. However, they will seek to avoid open confrontation with EU institutions over Ukraine and their ties with Moscow.


      Dimitar Bechev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Are Russia-Japan Relations Really Warming Up?

    The truth is that Japan’s government is seeking a degree of reengagement but at a vastly reduced level than under Abe. Most significantly, Japan has shown no willingness to ease sanctions.

      James D.J. Brown

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Brussels and Baku Are Talking Again: What Next?

    Azerbaijan’s relations with the EU appear to be going from strength to strength after several years in the deep freeze following the military escalation in Karabakh in 2023 and Azerbaijan’s bitter fallout with France and several other EU member states.

      Shujaat Ahmadzada

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    As Trump Threatens to Quit NATO, the Baltic States Are Playing for Time

    Governments in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania want to ensure that a U.S. military withdrawal would not leave them dangerously exposed to a Russian attack.

      Sergejs Potapkins

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Azerbaijan Looks to Tap Ukraine’s Military Expertise With Raft of New Deals

    Baku’s backing for Ukraine is less about confronting Russia than about quietly broadening the mix of partners it relies on.

      Zaur Shiriyev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.