China’s War on Low U.S. Interest Rates—When Imbalances Get Out of Hand

{
  "authors": [
    "Michael Pettis"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

In The Media

China’s War on Low U.S. Interest Rates—When Imbalances Get Out of Hand

Despite recent Chinese criticism of low U.S. interest rates, changing these rates in either direction would have adverse effects on China’s economy, underscoring the deep imbalances in the global financial system.

By Michael Pettis

Published on Nov 17, 2009

Source: The New York Times

China’s War on Low U.S. Interest Rates—When ImbalaEDITORS: After their summit meeting on Tuesday, President Obama and President Hu Jintao of China announced that they had agreed on many issues. But their statement was vague, in contrast to the pointed criticisms Chinese officials have been making of American financial policies in recent days. Over the weekend, China’s top bank regulator attacked the low interest rates in the United States, even though the Federal Reserve continues to indicate that it will not raise them anytime soon. Would higher rates in America be in China’s best interests anyway? While Chinese investments might earn higher returns, if American consumers spend even less if it costs more to borrow, would that be a bigger problem? Or is China less and less dependent on Americans’ ability to buy its products?

PETTIS: The criticism by China’s top bank regulator, Liu Mingkang, of too-low U.S. interest rates indicates how terribly confused the debate has become. Low U.S. interest rates and the expected depreciation of the American dollar encourage investors to borrow dollars and invest in Asia, where it may be encouraging additional investment in China, a country that is already drowning in too much investment.

But low interest rates in the U.S. will help reverse the sharp fall in U.S. consumption that has been catastrophic for China’s export sector.

China’s overinvestment problem was created as part of the imbalance that had Chinese overproduction feeding American overconsumption for many years. China’s huge stimulus is likely to increase production even further at the expense of domestic consumption, putting even more pressure on China to sell its excess capacity to American consumers.

So which hurts China, lower or higher U.S. interest rates? Unfortunately, both. That is the problem with imbalances getting out of hand. They are never easy to fix.

About the Author

Michael Pettis

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China

Michael Pettis is a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. An expert on China’s economy, Pettis is professor of finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, where he specializes in Chinese financial markets.

Recent Work

Commentary
What GDP Means in a Soft Budget Economy Like China
- Michael Pettis
Commentary
What’s New about Involution?
- Michael Pettis

Economy Trade Foreign Policy North America United States East Asia China

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary
Carnegie Politika
The Afghanistan–Pakistan War Poses Awkward Questions for Russia
Not only does the fighting jeopardize regional security, it undermines Russian attempts to promote alternatives to the Western-dominated world order.
Ruslan Suleymanov
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Moldova Floats a New Approach to Its Transnistria Conundrum
Moldova’s reintegration plan was drawn up to demonstrate to Brussels that Chișinău is serious about the Transnistria issue—and to get the West to react.
Vladimir Solovyov
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Lukashenko’s Bromance With Trump Has a Sell-By Date
Lukashenko is willing to make big sacrifices for an invitation to Mar-a-Lago or the White House. He also knows that the clock is ticking: he must squeeze as much out of the Trump administration as he can before congressional elections in November leave Trump hamstrung or distracted.
Artyom Shraibman
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East
The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.
Sergey Vakulenko
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market
The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.
Alexandra Prokopenko

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

The Afghanistan–Pakistan War Poses Awkward Questions for Russia

Not only does the fighting jeopardize regional security, it undermines Russian attempts to promote alternatives to the Western-dominated world order.

Ruslan Suleymanov

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Moldova Floats a New Approach to Its Transnistria Conundrum

Moldova’s reintegration plan was drawn up to demonstrate to Brussels that Chișinău is serious about the Transnistria issue—and to get the West to react.

Vladimir Solovyov

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Lukashenko’s Bromance With Trump Has a Sell-By Date

Lukashenko is willing to make big sacrifices for an invitation to Mar-a-Lago or the White House. He also knows that the clock is ticking: he must squeeze as much out of the Trump administration as he can before congressional elections in November leave Trump hamstrung or distracted.

Artyom Shraibman

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

Sergey Vakulenko

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

Alexandra Prokopenko