• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "scholarSpotlight",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SCP",
  "programs": [
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Scholar Spotlight

Executive Summary: Leadership Initiative On Transportation Solvency

The Leadership Initiative on Transportation Solvency will develop a non-partisan solution for financing an improved and self-sustaining transportation system in the United States.

Link Copied
Published on Aug 5, 2010

Mission

The Leadership Initiative on Transportation Solvency will develop a non-partisan solution for financing an improved and self-sustaining transportation system in the United States. Under the leadership of three distinguished political figures, the initiative will conduct an analysis of strategies to fund America’s transportation system that are politically realistic but also serve to make transportation better, greener, and more fiscally sound.

Leadership Team

  • The initiative is being led by former U.S. Senator Bill Bradley, former Pennsylvania Governor and Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, and former U.S. Comptroller General and now president of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation David Walker.

  • Staffing and support for the project is being provided by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Energy and Climate Program.

The Problem

  • When Congress created the interstate highway system in 1956 it was meant to be self-sustaining. Funds were raised through a combination of federal gasoline and excise taxes and then deposited into the Highway Trust Fund, which is used to maintain America’s transportation infrastructure.

  • The gas tax has remained unchanged since 1993 while transportation spending has continued to grow.

  • There is an ever-widening gap between the amount of money flowing into the system and the amount of money being spent.

  • The Highway Trust Fund is not only broke, it is broken. Of the $78 billion spent by the federal government every year on transportation, $25 billion is funded from the United States Treasury’s general revenues. 

  • Bailing out the Highway Trust Fund year after year is not only fiscally unsustainable, it also shortchanges critical improvements to America’s crumbling infrastructure.
  • Failure to reform our transportation system risks deepening U.S. dependence on oil, adding to climate change, and eroding American economic competitiveness.

The Solution

  • Conduct intensive analysis of existing federal transportation programs and identify opportunities to sunset programs that have achieved their initial objective or are no longer relevant.

  • Explore the possibility of using transportation-related carbon pricing to fund future transportation improvements.

  • Produce a long-term strategy that will simultaneously finance America’s transportation infrastructure, decrease the deficit, and reduce carbon emissions.

Policy Recommendations

  • In spring 2011, the initiative will unveil its findings and the final report will issue policy recommendations for consideration by Congress. Preliminary findings will be released in advance of the President’s Fiscal Responsibility and Reform Commission.
Climate ChangeNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Lukashenko’s Bromance With Trump Has a Sell-By Date

    Lukashenko is willing to make big sacrifices for an invitation to Mar-a-Lago or the White House. He also knows that the clock is ticking: he must squeeze as much out of the Trump administration as he can before congressional elections in November leave Trump hamstrung or distracted.

      Artyom Shraibman

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

    The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    How Far Can Russian Arms Help Iran?

    Arms supplies from Russia to Iran will not only continue, but could grow significantly if Russia gets the opportunity.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is There Really a Threat From China and Russia in Greenland?

    The supposed threats from China and Russia pose far less of a danger to both Greenland and the Arctic than the prospect of an unscrupulous takeover of the island.

      Andrei Dagaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Ukrainian Villages Are a Bigger Prize for Putin Than a Deal With Trump

    Western negotiators often believe territory is just a bargaining chip when it comes to peace in Ukraine, but Putin is obsessed with empire-building. 

      Andrey Pertsev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.