Commentary
Despite having the resources and expertise, the Russian space industry missed the opportunity to offer the United States or China a mutually rewarding partnership in the lunar race.
Georgy Trishkin
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Russia",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Press Release
NATO best served by realistic nuclear policy review
With widening calls to move toward a world free of nuclear weapons, NATO’s nuclear policy will be high on the agenda during the Alliance’s November summit in Lisbon.
Published on Oct 27, 2010
WASHINGTON—With widening calls to move toward a world free of nuclear weapons, NATO’s nuclear policy will be high on the agenda during the Alliance’s November summit in Lisbon. In a new paper, Detlef Waechter writes that NATO members should endorse the approach outlined by Secretary of State Clinton in April calling for NATO to retain its nuclear capability but begin an internal process of rethinking its nuclear posture. This modest but realistic course signals a commitment to defending member states while also demonstrating progress on arms control and disarmament.
Key Policy Recommendations:
- Conduct a nuclear review. The short new NATO Strategic Concept is unlikely to give military planners the appropriate guidance for effectively implementing NATO’s nuclear policy. Its leaders should therefore task the NATO Council to conduct a review to be endorsed at the next summit meeting.
- Talk with Russia. Redeploying or eliminating NATO weapons should not be a precondition for negotiating with Russia, but an end result. Launching a dialogue on transparency, reductions, and redeployment needs to be the priority for the NATO–Russia Council meeting that will be attended by President Medvedev in Lisbon.
- Adopt a multi-track approach. Given Russia’s perception of its military inferiority, insulated talks solely on tactical nuclear weapons will ultimately fail. A multi-track approach combining tactical nuclear weapons, stockpiled U.S. strategic weapons, conventional arms control, and missile defense could help the Alliance reach its goal of a nuclear-weapon-free Europe. These negotiations cannot be formally linked but are convergent.
Achieving a Europe free of nuclear weapons "requires considerable will to compromise on the part of the United States, which owns the tactical nuclear weapons in Europe as well as the strategic weapons systems," Waechter writes. "But the result—a European continent free of nuclear weapons, a NATO reconciled with Russia, and an Alliance free to tackle emerging security threats—would certainly make the effort worthwhile."
NOTES
Click here to read the policy outlook online
Detlef Waechter is a German diplomat and a visiting fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He served on Chancellor Angela Merkel’s foreign and security policy team in the Federal Chancellery from 2007–2010, and from 2005 to 2007 served in the German Permanent Representation at NATO in Brussels.
The Carnegie Nuclear Policy Program is an internationally acclaimed source of expertise and policy thinking on nuclear industry, nonproliferation, security, and disarmament. Its multinational staff stays at the forefront of nuclear policy issues in the United States, Russia, China, Northeast Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East.
Press Contact: Kendra Galante, 202-939-2233, pressoffice@ceip.org
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Is There a Place for Russia in the New Race Back to the Moon?
- Conspiracy Theories Are Eclipsing the Real Dangers of Russia’s Messaging App MaxCommentary
The internet is awash not only with instructions from digital security experts, but also with urban legends and conspiracy theories that divert attention away from the real dangers of Max.
David Frenkel
- Blocking of Telegram App Sparks Rare Public Rift Among Russia’s ElitesCommentary
The prospect of a total block on Russia’s most popular messaging app has sparked disagreement between the regime’s political managers and its security agencies.
Andrey Pertsev
- The Afghanistan–Pakistan War Poses Awkward Questions for RussiaCommentary
Not only does the fighting jeopardize regional security, it undermines Russian attempts to promote alternatives to the Western-dominated world order.
Ruslan Suleymanov
- What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle EastCommentary
The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.
Sergey Vakulenko
