Commentary
Trade volumes between Russia and African nations have fallen since the last event in 2019, while the war in Ukraine and Wagner’s activities on the continent have strained political ties.
Vadim Zaytsev
{
"authors": [],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Egypt"
],
"topics": []
}
Source: Getty
Other
Ghad Party
A backgrounder on the Ghad (Tomorrow) Party.
Published on Sep 20, 2011
This resource was published on 09/20/2011 and is not updated to reflect changing circumstances.
Originally a splinter group of the al-Wafd Party, al-Ghad has maintained its liberal orientation, though it joined the Democratic Alliance with the Freedom and Justice Party rather than the Egypt Bloc with most other liberal parties during the 2011-2012 parliamentary elections. Troubled by internal dissension exacerbated by the Mubarak regime’s effort to discredit its leader, Ayman Nour, the party has failed to establish an identity separate from that of Nour.
Today the party is technically split into two parts, the al-Ghad al-Jedid Party controlled by Ayman Nour, and the al-Ghad Party, controlled by leaders Nour claims were installed by Mubarak. Nour has been attempting to regain control over the original al-Ghad Party license, while at the same time pursuing official recognition of his al-Ghad al-Jedid Party. On October 10, 2011, a Cairo court reversed an early ruling and granted al-Ghad al-Jedid legal recognition as a party. However, on October 16, Cairo’s Court of Cassation upheld Nour’s 2005 forgery conviction, rendering him ineligible to run in the presidential elections.
Major Party Figures
Ayman Nour: President of al-Ghad al-Jedid
Background
Al-Ghad was established in 2004 by Ayman Nour, a former New Wafd parliamentarian who resigned in 2001 after a high-profile dispute with its leader, Noman Gomaa. After the Political Parties Committee rejected his bid for recognition, Nour pursued the case through the courts and ultimately obtained licensing. At the time of the party’s official recognition, a significant number of al-Ghad members identified as former Wafdists.
The Mubarak regime was concerned about the new party, particularly after Nour announced he intended to run for president in 2005. It thus tried to discredit the organization by accusing Nour of forging thousands of membership applications in order to obtain registration. In September 2005, Nour nonetheless ran as the party’s candidate in Egypt’s first multicandidate presidential elections, where he came in a distant second behind Hosni Mubarak with 7.6 percent of the vote. On December 24, 2005, Nour was convicted of forgery and sentenced to five years in prison. He was released on health grounds in January 2009.
Al-Ghad has also been plagued by serious internal problems. A faction hostile to Nour gained control of the party and was allowed to run its list of candidates in the 2005 parliamentary elections, winning one vote. In response, Nour launched al-Ghad al-Jedid and is trying to regain control of the original al-Ghad through the courts. The lawsuit brought by Nour has so far failed to resolve the issue, and Moussa Mustafa Moussa has remained president of the original al-Ghad party.
Platform
Political Issues
- Supporting a representative and parliamentary system of government
- Reviving religious tolerance through protecting freedom of religion and belief
- Protecting the equal rights of all Egyptians regardless of faith or race
- Supporting women’s rights and reforming laws to give women equal rights with men, including repealing marriage laws which do not grant citizenship rights to foreign husbands married to Egyptians
- Supporting a democratic system which solves conflicts peacefully through elections and the democratic process
- Protecting civil rights and liberties
- Eliminating the state’s monopoly on the media which destroys clear thought
Socioeconomic Issues
- Supporting a social market economy
- Calling for social justice
- Making social insurance in education, health care, and retirement a national project
- Rejecting terrorism, racism, and hateful ideologies and welcoming all ideologies which support freedom, democracy, and tolerance
- Maintaining a strong regulatory role for the state, which is to be held responsible for implementing a comprehensive development strategy in rural and urban areas
- Pursuing environmentally sustainable solutions to the water scarcity crisis
- Establishing a development bank to help alleviate poverty
- Eliminating corruption in the bureaucracy by toughening anti-bribery laws
- Introducing educational reform and reevaluating outdated classroom curricula
Foreign Policy Issues
- Supporting a strong, independent, and developed Egypt
- Safeguarding Egypt’s national security interests
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Second Russia-Africa Summit Lays Bare Russia’s Waning Influence
- What’s Behind Russia’s Charm Offensive in Africa?Commentary
Africa is becoming a battlefield of artificial narratives. The Kremlin pretends it is creating a “second front” and challenging the rules-based order, while the West feigns concern over the Kremlin’s actions there, while knowing perfectly well that the main threat to its interests in the region is actually China.
Vadim Zaytsev
- Russia’s Mediation Goals in LibyaCommentary
In order to secure its economic interests in Libya, Russia is seeking to bolster Haftar’s influence over a future UN-brokered diplomatic settlement.
Samuel Ramani
- Why Sisi Seems WorriedCommentary
Egypt’s upcoming presidential election may not remove the incumbent, but many problems lie ahead if he wins.
Michele Dunne
- Do Terrorist Trends in Africa Justify the U.S. Military’s Expansion?Article
Based on the data, policymakers and practitioners need to ask hard questions about whether the terrorist threat justifies a continuing U.S. military buildup in Africa.
Steve Feldstein
