• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Sinan Ülgen"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Turkey’s Transformation"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "Europe"
  ],
  "topics": []
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

Shows of Strength in the Mediterranean

Should tensions over Cyprus remain unsettled, Turkey's relationship with the EU is likely to undergo a fundamental transformation that might mark an end Turkey's accession dreams and force the EU to deal with a much more assertive regional power.

Link Copied
By Sinan Ülgen
Published on Sep 29, 2011

Source: European Voice

Shows of Strength in the MediterraneanEmboldened by its rising profile and influence in the Middle East, Turkey is raising the stakes in the dispute over Cyprus's reunification. The first signal came in July when Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu spoke of “freezing” Ankara's relations with the EU when Cyprus assumes the rotating presidency of the Council of Ministers in 2012. He also reiterated that for such a negative outcome to be avoided, a solution to the Cyprus problem must be found.

This warning is a manifestation of Turkey's policy of focusing EU member states' attention on the importance of settling the Cyprus dispute. UN-sponsored negotiations on the island are entering a critical phase, with UN Secretary-general Ban Ki-moon to host Turkish and Greek Cypriot leaders for what diplomats portray as make-or-break talks in October. At that meeting, the secretary-general will decide whether enough progress has been made in the negotiations to warrant the transition to the next phase, which will involve a multi-party peace conference.

Last week, Turkey again reminded the EU about the consequences of a failure to settle the Cyprus dispute, in its response to an emerging crisis on gas exploration in the eastern Mediterranean.

Having signed an agreement to delineate its territorial waters with Israel, Cyprus decided to start exploration for oil and gas off the island's southern shores, which Nicosia claims is part of the island's continental shelf. Ankara took a different view, declared that Cyprus had no right to start exploration on behalf of an island that remains divided, and sent warships to the region. A direct confrontation was averted only when Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan promised US President Barack Obama that Turkey would not intervene to prevent the exploration work.

Ankara's counter-move, however, proved barely any more conciliatory. Within days, Turkey signed an agreement with the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus to start its own oil and gas exploration. Turkey declared that this exploration would extend to a region of up to 200 nautical miles from the Turkish shore – a zone that overlaps with the region where Greek Cypriots have started exploration. Finally, Erdogan stated that Turkey would cancel this initiative only if the Greek Cypriots would do the same.

The growing row between Turkey and Israel adds a further twist to this already complex story. Israel supports the Greek Cypriot initiative. To counter the prospect of Israeli airplanes harassing Turkish ships sent to the region, Turkey decided to dispatch its own F16s to be stationed in northern Cyprus.

These events illustrate the potentially explosive nature of the situation in the eastern Mediterranean. They are the result of two interlinked dynamics whose impact on Turkey-EU relations is significant.

The EU's inability to reach a consensus on Turkish accession has eventually, but irrevocably, led to a loss of leverage over Turkey. From being the main act, the EU has now become – at best – a sideshow for Ankara. At the same time, with its growing economy and increasing regional influence, Turkey has acquired a new assertiveness and ambition. The vision of transforming Turkey into a regional power has replaced the vision of EU membership. Turkey sees itself as more than an EU candidate country. Turkey is also refuting and challenging the asymmetrical power relationship inherent in the accession process. Thus, while fully conscious that this crisis may damage its accession prospects, Turkey will not shy away from a direct confrontation with an EU member state.

Despite these trends, hope remains. Turkey is interested in a solution to the Cyprus problem. The UN-sponsored negotiations are perhaps the last opportunity.

But these events also suggest that should the Cyprus problem remain unsettled, Turkey's relationship with the EU will undergo a fundamental transformation that will reflect the shifting balance of power in the region. This transformation may end Turkey's accession dreams, but it will also force the EU to deal with a much more assertive regional power.

About the Author

Sinan Ülgen

Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Sinan Ülgen is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe in Brussels, where his research focuses on Turkish foreign policy, transatlantic relations, international trade, economic security, and digital policy.

    Recent Work

  • Q&A
    Can the EU Achieve Its Tech Ambitions?

      Raluca Csernatoni, Sinan Ülgen

  • Q&A
    Can the EU Overcome Divisions on Defense?

      Catherine Hoeffler, Sinan Ülgen

Sinan Ülgen
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Sinan Ülgen
Middle EastEurope

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Once Neutral on the Ukraine War, Arab States Increasingly Favor Moscow

    Disillusioned with the West over Gaza, Arab countries are not only trading more with Russia; they are also more willing to criticize Kyiv.  

      Ruslan Suleymanov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Lithuania’s Potash Dilemma Raises Questions About Sanctions’ Effectiveness

    What should happen when sanctions designed to weaken the Belarusian regime end up enriching and strengthening the Kremlin?  

      Denis Kishinevsky

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is There Really a Threat From China and Russia in Greenland?

    The supposed threats from China and Russia pose far less of a danger to both Greenland and the Arctic than the prospect of an unscrupulous takeover of the island.

      Andrei Dagaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Ukrainian Villages Are a Bigger Prize for Putin Than a Deal With Trump

    Western negotiators often believe territory is just a bargaining chip when it comes to peace in Ukraine, but Putin is obsessed with empire-building. 

      Andrey Pertsev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Has Trump the Destroyer Eclipsed Putin the Destroyer?

    Unexpectedly, Trump’s America appears to have replaced Putin’s Russia’s as the world’s biggest disruptor.

      Alexander Baunov

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.