Commentary
Yukon Huang, Isaac B. Kardon, Matt Sheehan
{
"authors": [
"Yukon Huang"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Slower Growth is Good for China
China has passed the point where double-digit growth alone can guarantee price stability and employment. It must now pursue more balanced and less rapid economic growth.
By Yukon Huang
Published on Oct 20, 2011
Source: Financial Times
Some have focused on the minor changes in sector growth patterns; evidence that China is finally rebalancing, with consumption rising relatively faster than output; and signs that fixed investment is becoming more judicious, with a slowdown in property development. While the general sense is that macroeconomic policies do not need major adjustments, globalists tend to worry more about whether China will continue to be a strong source of demand given the weakness of the US and eurozone economies.
Ostensibly, Beijing’s goal is to manage a “soft landing”. But even at home, many have not fully accepted the premise of the current five-year plan that slower, but higher quality growth, averaging seven per cent, is better. Skeptics believe that this target is no more credible than the 7.5 per cent target (compared with the actual 11 per cent achieved) in the just-completed plan.
Many recognise that slower growth would be more environmentally sustainable. Yet some vested interests still feel that these are issues for richer, more developed countries.
Thus making a credible case that seven per cent growth is better than ten means challenging the traditional objectives that have preoccupied China’s leaders during the post-Mao reform era. Two targets have been sacrosanct – price stability and employment generation – with the understanding that rapid economic growth makes them more achievable.
But times have changed. Keeping prices stable was much simpler when the main concern was providing access to a range of basic consumer goods at affordable prices. Having become the world’s assembly plant for such items has solved that problem. Instead, the current bout of inflation stem from the demand of a rising middle class for a varied diet of modern goods and services that are more costly to provide. Part of this is driven by the search for housing in cities where real estate prices have surged with urbanisation and speculative pressures. Pushing the economy to grow too fast will make it only harder to maintain price stability in the future.
However, employment generation made considerable sense when the stock of surplus labour in the countryside and in bloated state enterprises had to be absorbed by a small, but expanding, private industrial sector. China had to grow out of its past distortions and inefficiencies. But its employment needs today are quite different from those a generation ago. Faced with a declining labor force due to a rapidly aging population, creating copious, but relatively low-skilled, jobs is no longer the priority. The focus now is on fewer, but higher value-added, positions.
On both scores, Beijing and the rest of the world need to be more relaxed about China’s declining growth rates, provided that the process is managed well – which, of course, is a big if.
About the Author
Yukon Huang
Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Huang is a senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program where his research focuses on China’s economy and its regional and global impact.
- Three Takeaways From the Biden-Xi Meeting
- Europe Narrowly Navigates De-risking Between Washington and BeijingCommentary
Yukon Huang, Genevieve Slosberg
Recent Work
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle EastCommentary
The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.
Sergey Vakulenko
- Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer MarketCommentary
The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.
Alexandra Prokopenko
- A Tight Spot: Challenges Facing the Russian Oil Sector Through 2035Paper
Russian oil production is remarkably resilient to significant price changes, but significant political headwinds may lead to a drop regardless of economics.
Sergey Vakulenko
- Why Are China and Russia Not Rushing to Help Iran?Commentary
Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.
Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov
- Georgia’s Fall From U.S. Favor Heralds South Caucasus RealignmentCommentary
With the White House only interested in economic dealmaking, Georgia finds itself eclipsed by what Armenia and Azerbaijan can offer.
Bashir Kitachaev
