Lora Saalman
{
"authors": [
"Lora Saalman"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"China’s Foreign Relations",
"U.S.-China Relations"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": [
"Security",
"Arms Control"
]
}Source: Getty
China, the United States, and Iran
Iran’s position as major oil exporter to China affects the way Beijing perceives the Iranian nuclear crisis. However, energy security is also a factor prompting Beijing to move closer to the United States on this issue.
Source: Phoenix TV
Speaking in Chinese on the Phoenix television program Yihu yidu tan (Tiger Talk), Carnegie’s Lora Saalman explained that because of the dual-use nature of nuclear technology, the United States is concerned about Iran’s intentions and its capacity to build a nuclear weapon. Saalman maintained that U.S. military deployment in the Persian Gulf is, in part, a reaction to this threat, aimed at demonstrating U.S. conventional deterrence capabilities and commitment in the region. While this deployment plays a function in reassuring Israel, it does not necessarily mean that the United States intends to use force against Iran. Had the United States made the decision to use military means to resolve the Iranian nuclear dispute, Saalman added, it would likely already have done so.
Instead, she noted the United States is trying to utilize diplomatic means and negotiations first. Despite reports coming out of Iran, the Unites States government has been focused on exercising restraint and avoiding war. Saalman maintained that the statement of U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta best frames this approach, as he maintained that Iran has not yet made the decision to develop a nuclear weapon. Ultimately, Washington wants to avoid the mistakes it made in 2003 with the Iraq nuclear issue.
Saalman asserted that given China’s independent foreign policy, it is difficult for the United States to lobby China to converge with U.S. perspectives on the region. However, China has its own reasons for keeping its distance from Iran as it tries to diversify its oil imports and minimize exposure to destabilizing trends. From this perspective, the United Staets and China at times have converging interests that could serve as the basis of cooperation. Overall, China’s chief role is likely to be serving as an intermediary to facilitate the negotiation effort.
About the Author
Former Nonresident Associate, Nuclear Policy Program
Saalman was a nonresident associate in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Her research focuses on China’s nuclear and strategic policies toward India, Russia, and arms control.
- Balancing Chinese Interests on North Korea and IranPaper
- Why Beijing Stands by PyongyangIn The Media
Lora Saalman
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Simmering U.S.-Iran Conflict Is Moscow’s Ideal OutcomeCommentary
Ongoing uncertainty in the Middle East allows Moscow to both increase its influence in Tehran and continue to enjoy the financial windfall of higher oil prices.
Nikita Smagin
- How to Ensure That Europe-Russia Talks Do Not FailCommentary
Reestablishing a dialogue with Moscow is not a goal in its own right. The goal is to guarantee the independence of Ukraine and the peace and security of Europe.
Arkady Moshes
- Belarus Is a Test Case for Ukraine’s New Role in the RegionCommentary
Ukraine’s increasingly confrontational posture on Belarus reflects Kyiv’s effort to shape the emerging regional order in Eastern Europe. Kyiv wants to limit European normalization with Minsk—and any future rapprochement with Russia.
Balázs Jarábik
- Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime CollapseCommentary
A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.
Alexandra Prokopenko
- Is Belarus Really Set to Return to the Ukraine War?Commentary
By reminding the world that Lukashenko is a threat to NATO and Ukraine, Kyiv is trying to return the focus to why the Belarusian regime needs to be contained rather than rewarded.
Artyom Shraibman