Uri Dadush
{
"authors": [
"Uri Dadush"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Western Europe",
"Europe",
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Foreign Policy",
"EU"
]
}Source: Getty
Is the End of the Crisis in Sight?
As Italian and Spanish spreads on government bonds decline, Europeans are breathing a big sigh of relief. But true recovery requires big structural shifts that will take many years.
Source: Il Sole

The underlying cause of this terrible crisis is not fiscal. At the outbreak of the global financial crisis, government debt to GDP ratios in the periphery countries were lower than when the euro was created (Portugal was an exception). Spain and Ireland’s public debt burdens were much lower than Germany’s; even today, Spain’s debt burden is lower than Germany’s. The fiscal mess in the UK—a non-euro member—is worse than the situations in many eurozone countries, but it can borrow at record low interest rates.
Nor are weak banking systems at the root of the crisis in the periphery. When the global financial crisis hit, for example, the Italian banking system was in much better shape than the French, German, or UK banking systems.Today’s fiscal and banking weaknesses, dangerous as they are, are a result of the crisis, not its primary cause.
The root cause of the euro crisis is the huge cumulative deterioration in the periphery’s competitiveness, which began in the mid-1990s as exchange rates were frozen, interest rates converged, and domestic demand accelerated. This led to a progressive reallocation of the periphery’s production factors toward non-tradable services and construction and away from exports and import substitutes. This, in turn, was reflected in large and widening current account deficits in the periphery and surpluses in the core.
This process could continue only so long as financial markets incorrectly believed that the periphery’s domestic-demand-based growth model was sustainable. But the global financial crisis triggered a change in sentiment that would have come along at some point anyway. Ironically, the crisis may have done Europe a favor by revealing a cancer that could have spread irremediably.
Look away from the sovereign spread, and the fact that the crisis will take many years to overcome stares you in the face. Spain’s unemployment rate is at 23 percent, Greece’s is roughly 20 percent, and Portugal’s is at almost 15 percent—and all three are headed for a deepening recession this year. Ireland is only a little better off. Italy’s unemployment picture is better, but its growth outlook is even worse, and it is still early in its adjustment.
With large fiscal contraction in store over the next two years, banks deleveraging, and consumers and investors scared, there is no possibility of growth coming from domestic demand in the foreseeable future.
The only route to growth now is by exporting or by substituting for imports—Spaniards buying more Spanish-made cars and fewer German ones. A quick panoramic look tells you that Greece is least capable of achieving this because it has no significant export sector except tourism; for that reason, Greece may have to leave the euro. Portugal is in only a slightly better position. Ireland has a big export sector based on pharmaceuticals and high-tech goods, funded and operated by foreign multinationals with deep pockets, so it has a real chance of reigniting growth. Spain has several competitive international firms, but its export sector is too small. And with truly enormous macroeconomic imbalances, its success in sparking growth is uncertain.
Italy, meanwhile, has a large and diversified manufacturing export base, and even though its public debt is greater, its imbalances are not nearly as large as Spain’s. I believe Italy can eventually have a trade-led recovery, but only if it can moderate its wages and prices, requiring fiscal austerity as well as a steady structural transformation over many years. Mario Monti’s government has gotten off to a very good start, but completing the marathon will require endurance, not just speed.
And it goes without saying that to complete the marathon, the runners will also need water and emergency assistance—liquidity from the European Central Bank and help from a big European/IMF Stability Facility if needed.
How will we know the crisis is ending? Not by looking at spreads. Nor even, I would dare say, by looking at whether Greece or Portugal remains in the eurozone. The end of the crisis will be heralded by a return to sustained growth that affords decent living standards and employment opportunities to all citizens.
This article was originally published in Italian in Il Sole.
About the Author
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.
- The Labors of TsiprasCommentary
- Greece, Complacency, and the EuroIn The Media
Uri Dadush
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- By Waging War on Its Sovereignty, Putin Has United UkraineCommentary
The war does threaten Putin’s existence. That is why he does not negotiate.
René Nyberg
- Red Sea Mirage: Why Russia Is Still Waiting on a Military Base in SudanCommentary
Russia’s coveted Red Sea naval base has fallen victim to its erratic foreign policy.
Sergey Konyashin
- Deportation of Russian Propagandist Reveals Battle Over Church Influence in the BalkansCommentary
Mikhail Zvinchuk’s detention could have dealt a serious blow to Russia’s propaganda infrastructure in the Balkans. Instead, the incident has made something else eminently clear: Moscow values and protects its propagandists, while Europe still hasn’t figured out what to do with them.
Ivan Filippov, Ksenia Luchenko
- Vučić’s Downfall in Serbia Is Fatal to Russia’s Influence in the BalkansCommentary
The new Serbian leadership may have promised to keep on cooperating with Russia, but soon they will have to make a choice between fighting corruption and sealing lucrative deals with Moscow. The two are mutually exclusive, even if the new leaders in Belgrade haven’t yet realized it.
Maksim Samorukov
- How Did Serbia Remove Vučić Without a Single Smashed Window?Commentary
Serbia’s electoral earthquake is an extremely rare example of an entire political system being defeated by street protesters who played by the rules.
Alexander Baunov