Securing 'Loose Nukes'

{
  "authors": [
    "Toby Dalton",
    "Matthew Rojansky",
    "Deepti Choubey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "Israel",
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "Pakistan",
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Nuclear Policy",
    "Nuclear Energy"
  ]
}

In The Media

Securing 'Loose Nukes'

Different regional actors had different agendas and priorities for the recent Seoul Nuclear Security Summit.

By Toby Dalton, Matthew Rojansky, Deepti Choubey

Published on Mar 29, 2012

Source: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Speaking to the Wilson Center's CONTEXT, Carnegie's Toby Dalton and Matt Rojansky explained how the issues debated during the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul are viewed in India, Pakistan, Israel, and Russia.

Rojansky said that the Seoul summit represents an opportunity for Russia to show that it has turned the corner from being a nuclear security problem state to being a state that is part of the solution.

Dalton added that from a South Asian standpoint, particularly for India and Pakistan—countries that are not part of the NPT—the Nuclear Security Summit provides an opportunity to engage with the international community on nuclear issues without the politics.

Dalton also highlighted two issues as particularly important this year: converting research reactors that use highly enriched uranium to reactors using low enriched uranium, and the implementation of international legal instruments of nuclear security standards.

Rojansky said that the breakaway territory Transnistria of the former Soviet state Moldova is an important area because of its proximity to the Black Sea, an area where uranium is often smuggled. "Having this ungoverned zone implicates a lot of issues that go beyond nuclear security, but this is something we have to take much more seriously," he said.

About the Authors

Toby Dalton

Senior Fellow and Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program

Toby Dalton is a senior fellow and co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment. An expert on nonproliferation and nuclear energy, his work addresses regional security challenges and the evolution of the global nuclear order.

Matthew Rojansky

Former Deputy Director, Russia and Eurasia Program

Rojansky, formerly executive director of the Partnership for a Secure America, is an expert on U.S. and Russian national security and nuclear-weapon policies.

Deepti Choubey

Former Deputy Director, Nuclear Policy Program

Choubey was previously the director of the Peace and Security Initiative for the Ploughshares Fund. She also worked for Ambassador Nancy Soderberg in the New York office of the International Crisis Group.

Nuclear Policy Nuclear Energy Middle East Israel South Asia India Pakistan Caucasus Russia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary
Carnegie Politika
The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End
For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.
Friedrich Conradi
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
What Does Nuclear Proliferation in East Asia Mean for Russia?
Troubled by the growing salience of nuclear debates in East Asia, Moscow has responded in its usual way: with condemnation and threats. But by exacerbating insecurity, Russia is forcing South Korea and Japan to consider radical security options.
James D.J. Brown
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?
The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.
Maria Kolomychenko
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Russia’s Coal Industry Is Running on Borrowed Time
Powerful lobbyists and inertia led to Russia’s coal-mining sector missing an excellent opportunity to solve its structural problems.
Alexey Gusev
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?
After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive.
Tatiana Stanovaya

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End

For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.

Friedrich Conradi

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

What Does Nuclear Proliferation in East Asia Mean for Russia?

Troubled by the growing salience of nuclear debates in East Asia, Moscow has responded in its usual way: with condemnation and threats. But by exacerbating insecurity, Russia is forcing South Korea and Japan to consider radical security options.

James D.J. Brown

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?

The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.

Maria Kolomychenko

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Russia’s Coal Industry Is Running on Borrowed Time

Powerful lobbyists and inertia led to Russia’s coal-mining sector missing an excellent opportunity to solve its structural problems.

Alexey Gusev

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?

After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive.

Tatiana Stanovaya