Article
Thomas de Waal
{
"authors": [
"Thomas de Waal"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Caucasus",
"Russia",
"Azerbaijan",
"Armenia",
"Georgia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Remembering Stalin
The figure of Stalin still provokes many positive reactions in the former Soviet Union.
Published on Mar 5, 2013
Source: BBC World News
Surveys commissioned by the Carnegie Endowment for The Stalin Puzzle have revealed that the figure of Stalin provokes more positive reactions than one might have expected in several countries of the former Soviet Union. Carnegie's Thomas de Waal, editor of the project, spoke to BBC World News to discuss some of the reasons behind these results. He concentrated on the two most startling facts found in the surveys: support for Stalin has risen in Russia since the first election of President Vladimir Putin, while, in Stalin’s native Georgia, approval ratings are even higher.
De Waal explained that de-Stalinization campaigns were only tried halfheartedly until many years after Stalin’s death, when Mikhail Gorbachev came to power. He added that the Soviet victory in World War Two also made Stalin the great unifier, on a par with the victorious leaders of the UK and the United States. This is accentuated by a lack of alternative hero figures. While current Russian leaders do not glorify Stalin, it remains difficult for them to criticize a figure who is seen to have built a strong state, de Waal suggested.About the Author
Thomas de Waal
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Thomas de Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, specializing in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.
- Managing Montreux: Turkey and the Russia-Ukraine War in the Black Sea
- There Is No Shortcut for Europe in ArmeniaCommentary
Thomas de Waal
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Control Above Reform: What’s Behind Ukraine’s Government and Security Reshuffle?Commentary
Ultimately, Zelensky sided neither with the reform camp nor with the military establishment as such, but with political control.
Balázs Jarábik
- Where Are President Tokayev’s Political Reforms Leading Kazakhstan?Commentary
Tokayev’s predecessor, Nursultan Nazarbayev, outlined arrangements for a power transition too soon and in too much detail, ultimately losing control over the process. Tokayev is determined not to meet the same fate.
Temur Umarov
- Building Mini-Refineries Will Not Solve Russia’s Gasoline CrisisCommentary
Official discussions about mini oil refineries are unlikely to come to anything—but the mere fact they’re happening reveals the regime is failing to deliver a functioning economy.
Sergey Vakulenko
- Are Russia’s Influential Rotenberg Brothers Headed for a Fall?Commentary
The security forces are targeting Arkady and Boris Rotenberg’s patronage network—and in Putin’s Russia, it’s extremely hard to stop a purge once it’s under way.
Mikhail Komin
- What Should We Take From Andrey Melnichenko’s Essay in the Economist?Commentary
Andrey Melnichenko’s essay offers no answer to the fundamental question of how, under any kind of negotiated settlement, Europe can protect itself from the Russian ressentiment that is inevitable in all scenarios except for an outright victory for Putin.
Leonid Bershidsky
