Commentary
Thomas de Waal
{
"authors": [
"Thomas de Waal"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Caucasus",
"Georgia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Georgia: Where Now for the National Movement?
Giorgi Margvelashvili, won the presidential election in Georgia with 62 percent of the vote. Second place and 22 percent went to former speaker of parliament, David Bakradze, of the United National Movement. That was quite a disastrous performance from a party which only one year ago was running the country.
Published on Oct 30, 2013
In the end it was all rather comfortable. The favorite, Giorgi Margvelashvili, won the presidential election in Georgia with 62 percent of the vote.
Some of the headlines dwelt on the low turnout of 46 percent. That in itself was a kind of perverse tribute to the democratic process, suggesting that Georgian voters did not see the election as a life-and-death struggle and were achieving Western-style levels of apathy. As the head of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly delegation, Matt Raidma, said, “Essentially, what we observed yesterday was a European election.”
Most of the intrigue in the days before the vote had been on who would win second place.
Former speaker of parliament Nino Burjanadze caused some late excitement with a firebrand campaign in which she openly called for warmer relations with Russia. If she had captured second place, it would have sent a signal that Georgia’s foreign policy orientation was in doubt. Eventually, Burjanadze got 10 percent of the vote and any hopes Moscow may have had of diverting Georgia off course came to nothing.
Second place and 22 percent of the vote went to former speaker of parliament, David Bakradze, of the United National Movement (UNM), Mikheil Saakashvili’s former governing party.
Bakradze himself was easily the best candidate the National Movement could find, the one least tainted by the abuses of the previous government and most ready to talk about reforming the party.
But his performance was not convincing either. An email from a National Movement spin-doctor informed me that the outcome was “solidifying the UNM’s place as the leading opposition force in the country,” while also arguing that the low turnout indicated “declining enthusiasm” for the new governing coalition, Georgian Dream.
Well, a low turnout almost meant fewer votes for Bakradze—to be precise, around 300,000 of them, or less than ten percent of the electorate. That was quite a disastrous performance from a party which only one year ago was running Georgia and predicting that it would stay in power almost indefinitely.
This is probably the wake-up call the UNM needed: a poor result which did not wipe it off the map. Saakashvili must draw the biggest conclusions as he steps down from office after a decade in power. His time truly is over and a colossal work of reinvention is needed to make his party relevant again.
About the Author
Thomas de Waal
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
De Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, specializing in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.
- Europolis, Where Europe Ends
- Taking the Pulse: Is It Time for Europe to Reengage With Belarus?Commentary
Thomas de Waal, ed.
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Georgia’s Fall From U.S. Favor Heralds South Caucasus RealignmentCommentary
With the White House only interested in economic dealmaking, Georgia finds itself eclipsed by what Armenia and Azerbaijan can offer.
Bashir Kitachaev
- The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced VotingCommentary
The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.
Andrey Pertsev
- Notes From Kyiv: Is Ukraine Preparing for Elections?Commentary
As discussions about settlement and elections move from speculation to preparation, Kyiv will have to manage not only the battlefield, but also the terms of political transition. The thaw will not resolve underlying tensions; it will only expose them more clearly.
Balázs Jarábik
- Where Does the Split in the Ruling Tandem Leave Kyrgyzstan?Commentary
Despite its reputation as an island of democracy in Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan appears to be on the brink of becoming a personalist autocracy.
Temur Umarov
- In Uzbekistan, the President’s Daughter Is Now His Second-in-CommandCommentary
Having failed to build a team that he can fully trust or establish strong state institutions, Mirziyoyev has become reliant on his family.
Galiya Ibragimova
