• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Sarah Chayes"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "Afghanistan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

In Afghanistan, a Lame Duck President is Complaining and Perhaps Conspiring

Six months away from Afghanistan’s presidential election, possibilities for election rigging are beginning to arise.

Link Copied
By Sarah Chayes
Published on Oct 9, 2013

Source: PRI’s The World

The first sign, says Sarah Chayes, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, is that President Hamid Karzai has "stuffed" the Independent Elections Commission with his supporters.  

 The next sign, she argues, is that many of the serious presidential contenders are Karzai-backers. So far, there is a "checkered" list of twenty-two candidates, some of whom have been charged with human right abuses. 

"Even more important than the individual names on the list," says Chayes, "is the sort of 'smoke and mirrors' of the whole exercise." She believes that Karzai, who isn't running, may be orchestrating a win for his party. He may be having friendly candidates run to make the election seem democratic and contested.

"It's sort of like false competition," claims Chayes, similar to one multinational company producing different brands of toothpaste. "People feel like there's an actual competion among these different brands, but they all belong to the same guy." 

"What I believe is going to happen is that, at an opportune moment, all but one of these pro-Karzai candidates is going to pull out and sort of throw his block of votes to the last remaining one," she says. 

Chayes admits she has no evidence that the upcoming election has been fixed, just the warning signs she is picking up. On top of that, little has been done to change the system since the 2009 presidential election, which was tainted by fraud.  

At the same time, President Karzai has been lashing out at the US. In an interview with the BBC this week, he said NATO is to blame for the country's current problems. 

"On the security front, the entire NATO exercise was one that caused Afghanistan a lot of suffering, a lot of loss of life, and no gains, because the country is not secure," he said.

Chayes sees the rhetoric partly as an effort by Karzai to "save face" for a domestic audience. But it may have unexpected consequences for him and the country, she says, because it's the sort of attitude that will scare off the Western investment that Karzai needs. 

"I still don't think much of the Afghan leadership understands just how tired the US public and goverment is with this exercise," Chayes notes, "and with what little regret the US will walk out the door and not look back!"

This interview was originally aired on PRI. 

About the Author

Sarah Chayes

Former Senior Fellow, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program

Sarah Chayes is internationally recognized for her innovative thinking on corruption and its implications. Her work explores how severe corruption can help prompt such crises as terrorism, revolutions and their violent aftermaths, and environmental degradation.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    China Financial Markets test

      Sarah Chayes

  • Paper
    Fighting the Hydra: Lessons From Worldwide Protests Against Corruption

      Sarah Chayes

Sarah Chayes
Former Senior Fellow, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program
Sarah Chayes
Political ReformDemocracySouth AsiaAfghanistan

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Tokayev’s New Constitution Is a Bet on Stability—At Freedom’s Expense

    Kazakhstan’s new constitution is an embodiment of the ruling elite’s fears and a self-serving attempt to preserve the status quo while they still can.

      Serik Beysembaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced Voting

    The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.

      Andrey Pertsev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Notes From Kyiv: Is Ukraine Preparing for Elections?

    As discussions about settlement and elections move from speculation to preparation, Kyiv will have to manage not only the battlefield, but also the terms of political transition. The thaw will not resolve underlying tensions; it will only expose them more clearly.

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Where Does the Split in the Ruling Tandem Leave Kyrgyzstan?

    Despite its reputation as an island of democracy in Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan appears to be on the brink of becoming a personalist autocracy.

      Temur Umarov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    In Uzbekistan, the President’s Daughter Is Now His Second-in-Command

    Having failed to build a team that he can fully trust or establish strong state institutions, Mirziyoyev has become reliant on his family.

      Galiya Ibragimova

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.