• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Deborah Gordon"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SCP",
  "programs": [
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [
    "Carnegie Oil Initiative"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

U.S. Energy Independence Is Unlikely

While the energy boom in the United States is increasing domestic access to oil and gas and growing exports of petroleum products, it is unlikely that this will translate into U.S. energy independence.

Link Copied
By Deborah Gordon
Published on Dec 13, 2013
Project hero Image

Project

Carnegie Oil Initiative

The Carnegie Oil Initiative analyzed global oils, assessing their differences from climate, environmental, economic, and geopolitical perspectives. This knowledge provides strategic guidance and policy frameworks for decision making.

Learn More

Source: International Economy Magazine

While the energy boom in the United States is increasing domestic access to oil and gas and growing exports of petroleum products, it is unlikely that this will translate into U.S. energy independence.

Factors beyond our control are likely to steer the U.S. away from independence. Some of these uncertainties include demand growth in emerging economies, future energy prices, and durable trade agreements, as well as the degree of policy intervention on climate change, water, and other societal impacts of fossil fuel use. The upsurge of tight oil, shale gas, other unconventional resources, and yet-to-be-discovered fossil fuels—in the United States and elsewhere—will only make the world more energy interdependent than ever before.

Setting politics aside, the technological push to develop different, difficult, and potentially more dangerous oil and gas resources is being driven by the unbridled power of the global marketplace. Petroleum products made from both U.S. oil and natural gas are extremely valuable and supplies to Asia, Europe, and elsewhere are on the rise. Pressure to ramp up liquefied natural gas exports is building. Direct sale of American crude oil to foreign markets could be the next energy foray.

With overall fossil fuel consumption currently flat or falling in America and Western Europe, growth in energy demand is in emerging economies. These burgeoning importers therefore are gaining influence in global energy markets. Exporting countries, including America, will increasingly reorient themselves to those markets. As such, the fossil fuel commodities produced domestically are not guaranteed to stay at home. The expanding array of fossil fuels is more likely to circumnavigate the globe. U.S. fossil fuel production could ultimately do more to trigger competition between global energy trade flows than fuel domestic independence.

If the ultimate goal is self-sufficiency, sovereignty, and security, the road to energy independence cannot be paved predominantly with fossil fuels. Energy efficiency and diversification into alternative renewable energy sources both need to play a far greater role on a worldwide scale.

Abundant fossil fuel supplies alone do not guarantee the United States and others energy independence. Just look at Saudi Arabia, Russia, and increasingly Canada. None of these countries have been able to isolate themselves from the world and avoid the economic and political struggles that oil and gas resource endowments bring.

Despite the hype and hubris, managing energy supplies will be an increasingly complex undertaking, one that needs to account for the externalities—climate change, water stresses, and various local impacts—that loom large. With the larger goal of international peace and security in mind, don’t be surprised if the United States continues to struggle with managing its energy bounty, whether it attains some measure of independence or not.

This article was originally published by International Economy Magazine.

About the Author

Deborah Gordon

Former Director and Senior Fellow, Energy and Climate Program

Gordon was director of Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program, where her research focuses on oil and climate change issues in North America and globally.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Petroleum Companies Need a Credible Climate Plan

      Deborah Gordon, Stephen D. Ziman

  • Article
    Advancing Public Climate Engineering Disclosure

      Deborah Gordon, Smriti Kumble, David Livingston

Deborah Gordon
Former Director and Senior Fellow, Energy and Climate Program
Deborah Gordon
Climate ChangeNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    How Far Can Russian Arms Help Iran?

    Arms supplies from Russia to Iran will not only continue, but could grow significantly if Russia gets the opportunity.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is There Really a Threat From China and Russia in Greenland?

    The supposed threats from China and Russia pose far less of a danger to both Greenland and the Arctic than the prospect of an unscrupulous takeover of the island.

      Andrei Dagaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Ukrainian Villages Are a Bigger Prize for Putin Than a Deal With Trump

    Western negotiators often believe territory is just a bargaining chip when it comes to peace in Ukraine, but Putin is obsessed with empire-building. 

      Andrey Pertsev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Has Trump the Destroyer Eclipsed Putin the Destroyer?

    Unexpectedly, Trump’s America appears to have replaced Putin’s Russia’s as the world’s biggest disruptor.

      Alexander Baunov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia’s Latest Weapons Have Left Strategic Stability on the Brink of Collapse

    The Kremlin will only be prepared to negotiate strategic arms limitations if it is confident it can secure significant concessions from the United States. Otherwise, meaningful dialogue is unlikely, and the international system of strategic stability will continue to teeter on the brink of total collapse.

      Maxim Starchak

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.