Commentary
Despite unhappiness on the ground, Moscow is determined to use both carrot and stick to ensure there is record support for United Russia in occupied Ukraine.
Konstantin Skorkin
{
"authors": [
"Chrystia Freeland",
"Michael McFaul",
"John Mearsheimer",
"Dmitri Trenin",
"Roger Cohen"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Russia",
"Eastern Europe",
"Ukraine",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Security",
"Foreign Policy",
"Global Governance"
]
}
Source: Getty
Russia, Ukraine, and the West: Is Confrontation Inevitable?
Ukraine is the most important strategic issue for Russia, and Putin, who mistrusts the West, worries that NATO enlargement may concern Ukraine.
Published on Jun 25, 2014
Source: Chatham House
Chrystia Freeland, a member of the Canadian Parliament, Michael McFaul, U.S. Ambassador to Russia in 2012-2014, John Mearsheimer, a professor of political science at the University of Chicago, Carnegie’s Dmitri Trenin, and Roger Cohen, a columnist at the New York Times, discussed the current situation in Ukraine, as well as Russian-Western relations, at Chatham House. The event was held in association with the International New York Times.
Trenin stated that “Ukraine is absolutely the most important strategic issue for Russia,” suggesting that this is where Putin’s worry over NATO enlargement comes from. Trenin explained that Putin mistrusts the West because he belives it has acted duplicitously to Russia, saying that the excessive Libyan air strike in 2011 was “a test of Western sincerity.” According to Trenin, the safe limits of NATO’s enlargement to the east have been reached, and “what we’ve seen in Georgia, what we’re seeing in Ukraine, testifies to that fact.”Trenin underscored that Russian security obsession is based on the “flawed… post-Cold War settlement. [It] did not include Russia into a common security system with the West—as it did include Germany, as it did include Japan after the World War II.”
Speaking about the situation in Ukraine, Trenin elaborated on the events in Eastern Ukraine as “not a foreign war” for ordinary Russians. He noted that “some Russians have ceased to be on speaking terms with other Russians as a result of what’s been happening.” However, he stressed that, in his opinion, it is in Russia’s national interest to deal with Ukraine as with a foreign country instead of having to “pay for them, give them a huge vote in your councils, and then face the prospects of them turning their back on you and going.”
On the issue of Western media portrayals of the Ukrainian crisis, Trenin said that “there is too much ideology [from the Western media]—in foreign policy debates.” This is “not a good thing,” he added.
About the Authors
Chrystia Freeland
Michael McFaul
Former Senior Associate
In addition to his role at Carnegie, McFaul is Peter and Helen Bing Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and associate professor of political science at Stanford University.
John Mearsheimer
Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.
Roger Cohen
SecurityForeign PolicyGlobal GovernanceNorth AmericaUnited StatesRussiaEastern EuropeUkraineWestern Europe
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Parliamentary Elections in Occupied Ukraine Risk Backfiring for the Kremlin
- Snubbed by United Russia as Elections Loom, Medvedev Looks Condemned to Eternal ObscurityCommentary
Medvedev’s defeat in the battle for the position of speaker appears to signal that the long process of his marginalization in Russian politics has passed the point of no return.
Andrey Pertsev
- Lukashenko’s Concessions to Kyiv Reflect Russia’s WeaknessCommentary
The recent damage inflicted by Ukrainian drones and missiles on Russia has made Belarus aware of its own vulnerabilities—and surprisingly amenable to Kyiv’s demands.
Artyom Shraibman
- Kremlin Struggles to Solve a VPN Problem of Its Own MakingCommentary
With its scattershot approach to enforcing internet censorship, the Russian regime risks losing a battle against the many Russians who have learned to evade online restrictions.
Maria Kolomychenko
- Could Ukraine Succeed in Torpedoing Putin’s Approval Ratings?Commentary
It is not a phenomenon unique to Russia that the public of a country at war (even the aggressor) enduring airstrikes will not overturn its government but rather show solidarity with it and blame its woes on the enemy.
Vladislav Gorin
