Central Asia’s digital ambitions are achievable, but only if policy is aligned with the region’s physical constraints.
Aruzhan Meirkhanova
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [
"Europe’s Eastern Neighborhood"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier discussed Germany’s recent and unprecedented foreign policy review, Review 2014.
BRUSSELS—German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said at a Carnegie Europe event Monday that “today’s international crises—from Ukraine to ISIS—are not a coincidence. They are symptomatic of a world where the structures of international order are eroding.”
Speaking on Germany’s recent and unprecedented foreign policy review, Review 2014, Steinmeier explained that “as a globally connected society and an export-based economy, Germany, more than others, depends on a functioning rules-based order.”
For Steinmeier—in his second stint as foreign minister under Chancellor Angela Merkel—“the European Union is the world’s most sophisticated example of a regional order. As such, we need to defend it.”
Steinmeier emphasized that “Europe can only be strong on the outside if the inside architecture is solid.” He noted that he “could not imagine what the values, the reputation, and the strength of European foreign policy would come to if Great Britain weren’t a part of it, [or] what would happen to [Europe’s] outside credibility and effectiveness if Greece left the euro.”
On the Ukraine conflict, Steinmeier said: “We have to be sure that violence doesn’t escalate again. We need to make sure that the military situation is calmed down in order to set the preconditions necessary to bring about a political process stipulated in the Minsk agreements.”
However, he warned that “we shouldn’t fool ourselves . . . The process will be very long. I don’t exaggerate when I say that it could take years, or decades, or even longer, for a political solution [to the Ukraine conflict].”
On EU-Russia relations, Steinmeier said much “depends on whether Russia will be steering or disturbing the political process [in Ukraine]. The question will be whether we will be able to restore the trust that has been shattered.”
A transcript, audio, and video produced by Deutsche Welle from the event are available on the Carnegie Europe website.
Press Contact: Christine Lynch | +32 2 209 29 93 | clynch@ceip.org
Carnegie Europe is the Brussels-based center of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Through publications, articles, seminars, and private consultations, Carnegie Europe aims to foster new thinking on the daunting international challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
Central Asia’s digital ambitions are achievable, but only if policy is aligned with the region’s physical constraints.
Aruzhan Meirkhanova
Not only does the fighting jeopardize regional security, it undermines Russian attempts to promote alternatives to the Western-dominated world order.
Ruslan Suleymanov
Moldova’s reintegration plan was drawn up to demonstrate to Brussels that Chișinău is serious about the Transnistria issue—and to get the West to react.
Vladimir Solovyov
Lukashenko is willing to make big sacrifices for an invitation to Mar-a-Lago or the White House. He also knows that the clock is ticking: he must squeeze as much out of the Trump administration as he can before congressional elections in November leave Trump hamstrung or distracted.
Artyom Shraibman
The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.
Sergey Vakulenko