• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Andrei Kolesnikov"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Inside Russia"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy",
    "Civil Society"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Russian Opposition “in a Great Depression” After Nemtsov Murder

Russians who support democratic views are in a state of despair after Boris Nemtsov’s murder. No one is likely to be able to replace Nemtsov.

Link Copied
By Andrei Kolesnikov
Published on Mar 2, 2015

Source: Deutsche Welle

Russians opposed to President Vladimir Putin are in a state of despair after Boris Nemtsov's murder, says Andrei Kolesnikov of the Carnegie Moscow Center. He can see no one stepping in to fill the Kremlin critic's shoes.

DW: Mr. Kolesnikov, what is your reaction to Friday's murder of opposition leader and Putin critic Boris Nemtsov?

Andrei Kolesnikov: It was very heart-wrenching, certainly, and emotional, and politically this is a great event in a very bad sense of the word, maybe one of the worst in several years. People who support democratic views are in absolute despair. It was a terrible shock for everybody - it was a shock because we talked many years before this event, talked about the regime, the consequences of the hate and aggression in the society and now we have these consequences before us in such an open way.

We saw tens of thousands turn out for a memorial march on Sunday. What do you think the opposition's next move will be in Russia?

Will this opposition consolidate, for example? I think no, because it [Sunday's march] was only a moral reaction, not a political reaction at all. It was a quiet and sad manifestation. So there will not be any kind of political consequences. We must understand that modern Russian society is very indifferent to any serious events. People are surviving. People are supporting, in their compromised way, but they are supporting the authorities, Putin as well, so they didn't feel some deep notions concerning some very important events around them. Here we face the core problem of modern Russian society, the indifference to such events.

Do you think this murder will galvanize those who are still calling for change, or dampen their efforts?

Nobody was calling for change. It was a call from the Russian opposition, but we can't even call it an opposition, something systematical with a tough structure. Opposition in modern Russia is more a notional category than a political category. So nobody will change anything from the side of the authorities and nobody can influence these changes from the side of the opposition. It's a very sad situation, but you must understand that it is so in modern Russia, there is such an atmosphere.

The impression that one gets here is that any opposition in Russia has been so much sidelined that they have become ineffective. What do they need to be able to do to become an effective opposition?

The opposition is in a great depression, it seems to me. I think the opposition will not be consolidated; it will have some attempts to consolidate people but it's impossible when all activity is absolutely blocked by the authorities and blocked by the legal trials against some people who participated in opposition actions.

The opposition must be thinking about the future maybe, developing some programs, some civil initiatives. They must think about the future, they must have some people who can be popular, because after the death of Nemtsov we can see that we have maybe only Alexei Navalny, no one else, who can be the political fighter. But Navalny is blocked absolutely by the authorities.

So, you really don't see anyone else who could take the place of Nemtsov?

In some sense, nobody can because he was some kind of mediator between the authorities and the opposition. He was close to a lot of people; he was some kind of a tie between the people. Because of that, even Navalny can't substitute for him in that sense. I don't know who can replace him.

This interview originally appeared on Deutsche Welle.

About the Author

Andrei Kolesnikov

Former Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Kolesnikov was a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    How the Putin Regime Subverted the Soviet Legacy

      Andrei Kolesnikov

  • Commentary
    Putin’s New Social Justice

      Andrei Kolesnikov

Andrei Kolesnikov
Former Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Andrei Kolesnikov
Political ReformDemocracyCivil SocietyRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    “Mr. Nobody Against Putin”: A Deep Dive Into Russian Propaganda

    Talankin and Borenstein’s documentary is a unique inside look at a regime that threatens the world and has killed thousands of people in its neighboring country. And many critics and general viewers alike draw parallels between the Putin regime and their own governments.

      Ekaterina Barabash

  • Paper
    A Tight Spot: Challenges Facing the Russian Oil Sector Through 2035

    Russian oil production is remarkably resilient to significant price changes, but significant political headwinds may lead to a drop regardless of economics.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Did Messaging App Telegram Fall From Grace in Russia?

    The history of Telegram’s relations with the Russian state offers a salutary lesson for international platforms that believe they can reach a compromise with the Kremlin.

      Maria Kolomychenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Tokayev’s New Constitution Is a Bet on Stability—At Freedom’s Expense

    Kazakhstan’s new constitution is an embodiment of the ruling elite’s fears and a self-serving attempt to preserve the status quo while they still can.

      Serik Beysembaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Nuances of Oscar-Winning Film “Mr. Nobody Against Putin”

    It’s disingenuous to criticize a film for simplifying Russia’s complexities when Russia is waging a brutally simple war of aggression against its neighbor.

      Alexander Baunov

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.