Douglas H. Paal
{
"authors": [
"Douglas H. Paal"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"China’s Foreign Relations",
"U.S.-China Relations"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
How the Realities of Office Will Temper Trump and His Team
With time and the need to accumulate achievements, policy issues will depend less on personalities, though the president’s personality will remain important, than on working with enduring realities.
Source: South China Morning Post
There are different things to observe about every new administration, and none more different than about the self-proclaimed disruptive Trump team. It may be the most change-minded new US government since Franklin Roosevelt upended years of Republican rule in the midst of the Great Depression in 1933. In some ways, it also mirrors Ronald Reagan’s takeover in 1981. Naturally, the media focus will be on the discontinuities – what’s new. But there are continuities as well. So to add a little spice to your observations, I would like to note some of these.
First, every new team that ousts the opposition party enters office on a campaign-induced emotional high. Energy levels are frenetic, a continuation of the excitement on the campaign trail. Those who were on the campaign plane are trusted; others, not so much. The wild-eyed enthusiasm of the incomers can be infectious, and it can be scary. Governing will immediately prove less fun than campaigning.
Second, they are riding into office on a pendulum that is swinging as far from the policies of the previous administration as possible. They find it hard to acknowledge positive contributions by their immediate predecessors and see a need for change in every dimension of government. Barack Obama was weak, Donald Trump is strong. Obama hated Vladimir Putin, so try the other way, seemingly regardless of what Putin has been doing. Obama accommodated Xi Jinping (習近平) to get climate change agreements, so ignore the agreements and make new demands on Xi.
Third, you need help to govern. Trump has a big advantage. Voter adversity to Hillary Clinton and Obama’s record has given Republicans the broadest grip on government since 1928: the White House, both Houses of Congress, soon a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, and 33 (out of 50) governors. So Trump stands a good prospect to enact a sweeping legislative agenda.
But Trump’s agenda has to tally with that of the congressional leadership. They need each other, and Congress is collectively less a radical departure from normal than is Trump. We see it in the selection of Mike Pence, a former congressman and governor as vice-president. The same is true for the new White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, former head of the Republican National Committee, who does the deals with Congress.
Remember, Trump was not even a Republican until recently. Compromise may have been a dirty word to Republicans before now, but it will be required in the near future if the initial electoral momentum is to be exploited effectively to create a legacy. By the way, that momentum does not last.
Fourth, campaigns receive support from sometimes warring or competing constituencies, yet they all expect to be rewarded. In Reagan’s early days, he had what seemed to be three chiefs of staff, Ed Meese, Michael Deaver and James Baker. It took a while, but Baker emerged as the winner. Trump has designated four policy bosses with purview over the priority campaign topic of trade, and it will take time to sort out who of the four speaks most authoritatively. As with Baker, I would bet on the most experienced and knowledgeable eventually to emerge on top.
Fifth, now more than ever, the mainstream media took sides in the election and seem to be refusing to accept Trump’s win. This has made Trump’s opponents at The New York Times, Washington Post and CNN outside the circle of those given leaks and inside accounts. If you rely on them to understand what’s happening behind the scenes, you’ll probably be misinformed. Privilege of insight seems to have been given to The Wall Street Journal and Fox News.
This has contributed to a mass of misinformation and gossip about subcabinet-level appointments, where much of the necessary work of government will be done. Here, the unreported story is of the arrival of key Capitol Hill staff members from relevant committees. While you read of potential office holders, long out of government with compromised records, succeeding or failing, jobs are being filled with relatively young, experienced professionals who will be durable. The establishment Republicans who sided with Clinton may have to chill outside for a while, but there are many able people to do the job.
Finally, all the above features of a transition of presidents are followed by another feature – the transition of policy. With time and the need to accumulate achievements, issues will depend less on personalities, though the president’s personality will remain important, than on working with enduring realities. China and Russia are not going away. Global warming has not been reversed. Crises must be dealt with, alliances and friendships reinforced. Doing deals is not a one-time thing for presidents.
If Trump’s recipe of less regulation and taxation, infrastructure construction, and military modernisation takes hold through legislation, America’s renewed economic energy should give his presidency a boost.
His tweeting seems unlikely to end, but observers are likely to be accustomed to it and Trump will have more to boast about than criticise.
This article originally appeared in the South China Morning Post.
About the Author
Distinguished Fellow, Asia Program
Paal previously served as vice chairman of JPMorgan Chase International and as unofficial U.S. representative to Taiwan as director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
- America’s Future in a Dynamic AsiaPaper
- U.S.-China Relations at the Forty-Year MarkQ&A
- +1
Douglas H. Paal, Tong Zhao, Chen Qi, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?Commentary
After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive.
Tatiana Stanovaya
- What’s Having More Impact on Russian Oil Export Revenues: Ukrainian Strikes or Rising Prices?Commentary
Although Ukrainian strikes have led to a noticeable decline in the physical volume of Russian oil exports, the rise in prices has more than made up for it.
Sergey Vakulenko
- Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle EastCommentary
The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.
Nikita Smagin
- Is Frustration With Armenia’s Pashinyan Enough to Bring the Pro-Russia Opposition to Power?Commentary
It’s true that many Armenians would vote for anyone just to be rid of Pashinyan, whom they blame for the loss of Nagorno-Karabakh, but the pro-Russia opposition is unlikely to be able to channel that frustration into an electoral victory.
Mikayel Zolyan
- Will Hungary’s New Leader Really Change EU Policy on Russia and Ukraine?Commentary
Orbán created an image for himself as virtually the only opponent of aid to Ukraine in the entire EU. But in reality, he was simply willing to use his veto to absorb all the backlash, allowing other opponents to remain in the shadows.
Maksim Samorukov