Article
Paul Stronski
{
"authors": [
"Paul Stronski"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [
"Changing Geopolitics of Eurasia"
],
"regions": [
"Central Asia",
"Kazakhstan"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Why Has Kazakhstan’s President Sacked His Government?
Kazakhstan’s president has fired the government over what he called its failure to shore up crumbling living standards. Will it be enough to satisfy his citizens’ demands?
Published on Feb 22, 2019
What’s happening?
On February 21, Kazakhstani President Nursultan Nazarbayev sacked his entire government. He scolded former cabinet members and regional governors for failing to address social problems or shore up the country’s social safety net. The decision comes amid growing popular anger over declining living standards, sparked by an early February house fire in the Kazakh capital that killed five children.
Nazarbayev frequently rotates his cabinet. But this mass dismissal was unprecedented in scale, as was his sharp criticism of the outgoing officials. It suggests that Nazarbayev sees an urgent need to appear decisive and divert attention away from rising socioeconomic dissatisfaction and his failed promises to improve the quality of life for average citizens in the country. In an effort to scapegoat his cabinet, Nazarbayev cited its failure to implement his decrees to create economic opportunities for the poor and middle class, diversify the economy, or improve the rule of law.
Why does it matter?
In his New Year’s address less than two months ago, Nazarbayev highlighted how the country’s quality of life, housing, and public transport have improved under his leadership. Yet average citizens do not feel these benefits. Despite years of high growth, Kazakhstan’s economy is struggling, even after oil prices recovered from the lows of 2015–2016. Economic growth is lethargic and wealth is unevenly distributed. Several rounds of currency devaluations in 2014 and 2015 wiped out the emerging middle class’ savings, and people continue to feel the pinch. Long a destination for migrant labor from other Central Asian countries, some Kazakhstani citizens are now leaving for economic opportunities abroad.
What’s next?
Kazakhstan is witnessing an uptick in nationalist sentiment and anger, as average Kazakhs grow dissatisfied with the status quo. Protests and criticism of the government on social media have likely put an end to rumors of an early election being held in 2019. Instead, the government will probably seek to increase spending on housing, education, health care, and support for families with children. It once again will pledge to diversify the economy away from hydrocarbons and fight corruption.
Nazarbayev has made similar pledges in the past. Yet his government has repeatedly failed to implement its own ambitious plans for political, economic, and social reform. Although Nazarbayev himself continues to enjoy popular legitimacy from his decades as leader of Kazakhstan, the system he put in place is experiencing a credibility crisis.
About the Author
Paul Stronski
Former Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program
Paul Stronski was a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Russia and Eurasia Program, where his research focuses on the relationship between Russia and neighboring countries in Central Asia and the South Caucasus.
- Russia’s Growing Footprint in Africa’s Sahel Region
- Russia in the Balkans After Ukraine: A Troubling ActorCommentary
Paul Stronski
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- After Ilia II: What Will a New Patriarch Mean for Georgia?Commentary
The front-runner to succeed Ilia II, Metropolitan Shio, is prone to harsh anti-Western rhetoric and frequent criticism of “liberal ideologies” that he claims threaten the Georgian state. This raises fears that under his leadership the Georgian Orthodox Church will lose its unifying role and become an instrument of ultraconservative ideology.
Bashir Kitachaev
- Tokayev’s New Constitution Is a Bet on Stability—At Freedom’s ExpenseCommentary
Kazakhstan’s new constitution is an embodiment of the ruling elite’s fears and a self-serving attempt to preserve the status quo while they still can.
Serik Beysembaev
- Why Has Kazakhstan Started Deporting Political Activists?Commentary
The current U.S. indifference to human rights means Astana no longer has any incentive to refuse extradition requests from its authoritarian neighbors—including Russia.
Temur Umarov
- The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced VotingCommentary
The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.
Andrey Pertsev
- Notes From Kyiv: Is Ukraine Preparing for Elections?Commentary
As discussions about settlement and elections move from speculation to preparation, Kyiv will have to manage not only the battlefield, but also the terms of political transition. The thaw will not resolve underlying tensions; it will only expose them more clearly.
Balázs Jarábik
