- +1
Rudra Chaudhuri, Tejas Bharadwaj, Konark Bhandari, …
{
"authors": [
"Shruti Sharma"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie India"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
"programAffiliation": "SAP",
"programs": [
"South Asia",
"Technology and International Affairs"
],
"projects": [
"Technology and Society"
],
"regions": [
"South Asia",
"India",
"Iran"
],
"topics": [
"Domestic Politics",
"Technology"
]
}Source: Getty
Combating Vaccine Hesitancy in India
Unless the government can up its communications game, anti-vax movements could prolong India’s pandemic effects.
Vaccine hesitancy is not a new challenge in India. According to a survey released by the social network LocalCircles in October 2021, approximately 7.5 percent of adults in India were hesitant to take COVID-19 vaccines. Just one month later, the figure had grown to 12.3 percent.
According to some researchers and industry experts, vaccine hesitancy is likely to prolong the pandemic, leading to greater damage to the economy and threatening countries’ abilities to recover from the current shocks. Although the size of such anti-vax groups is still small worldwide, their online communication strategy is effective, in contrast to groups that explain the benefits of vaccines.
In India, there is a variety of possible reasons for growing vaccine hesitancy, which has become one of the contributing factors in India’s delayed target to fully vaccinate its entire adult population. For one, the Indian population may have developed a fear of side effects due to the limited availability of clinical trial data to prove the vaccines’ safety and efficacy.
For another, the concept of vaccination in India is limited to infants and children, unlike in Western countries. Since the COVID-19 immunization program is the first-ever adult vaccination program in the country, there weren’t many dedicated adult vaccination centers. And the awareness regarding adult vaccination was poor, especially in rural India.
Moreover, India’s voluntary immunization program allowed people to opt out of getting the shot. While citizens residing in urban areas had better access to information explaining the benefits of vaccines, myths started circulating in rural areas that vaccines could lead to death and illnesses in adults, contributing to vaccine hesitancy.
Other obstacles include linguistic barriers to access appropriate information, religious and ideological beliefs, difficulty reaching the vaccination centers, inequitable access to the health system, and mistrust in the system.
To instill vaccine confidence and build trust in the health system, the Indian government is expanding its communication strategies, especially through social media, to curb the spread of misinformation. It is also leveraging some of its existing initiatives, such as the Aspirational Districts Collaborative, to engage with local leaders to dispel misinformation around COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, some district-level administrations are urging people to take vaccines through awareness sessions or using regional folk songs to convey the benefits of vaccines. While these are baby steps in the right direction, it is important for India to develop a sustained campaign to tackle hesitancy.
The state governments in India should invest in evidence-based research to identify sections of the population with lower trust in vaccines and recognize causes of their hesitancy to expand immunization coverage. A team of multidisciplinary experts from behavioral science, biology, sociology, and other related fields should be formed at the state level to conduct rigorous research surrounding the psychological, social, religious, and political beliefs of a population regarding the administration of vaccines. Changes in the education curriculum to spread awareness about the benefits of vaccines could also help to build confidence.
Communicating the benefits of vaccines in local languages—corroborated with strong scientific evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy—is perhaps the most important for enhancing people’s trust and confidence in vaccines. In addition to leveraging social media platforms and public posters to dispel myths and promote vaccines, door-to-door campaigns in vaccine-hesitant areas might be crucial to address people’s concerns and instill or restore confidence in vaccines or their government before more hesitancy spreads to other regions.
In addition to effective vaccination campaigns, interventions are needed to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake among those who wish to take the vaccine but have difficulty accessing the vaccination centers. For example, the government could introduce financial remuneration or encourage private health insurance companies to include vaccines in a person’s coverage. Nonfinancial incentives, such as free food or a free health check-up, can also serve this end. While this strategy is already being used in a few countries like Israel, Serbia, and the United States, India can also experiment with this approach.
Such sustained public engagement that anticipates people’s questions and addresses their concerns, combined with financial or nonfinancial incentives for vaccination, will be pivotal to address the reasons for vaccine hesitancy and strengthen India’s fight against this pandemic.
About the Author
Former Associate Director, Fellow, and Chief Coordinator, Global Technology Summit, Technology and Society Program
Shruti Sharma was an associate director and a fellow with the Technology and Society Program at Carnegie India, where she is currently working on exploring the challenges and opportunities in leveraging biotechnology to improve public health capacity in India. Additionally, she is the Chief Coordinator of Carnegie India's Global Technology Summit.
- The India-United Kingdom Technology and Security Initiative: Ideas for ChangeArticle
- The India-U.S. TRUST Initiative: A Resilient Pharma Supply ChainCommentary
Shruti Sharma
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- How the Kremlin Turned Tech Whiz-Kid VK Into a Loss-Making State CorporationCommentary
The war in Ukraine and a change in ownership led VK to neglect its commercial ventures in favor of implementing the Kremlin’s online agenda. Now it’s been sanctioned by the EU.
Maria Kolomychenko
- In Russia, Pacifism Is as Bad as Supporting the EnemyCommentary
A regime founded on force, coercion, and repression does not want its propaganda, with all its flaws of logic, omissions, and outright lies, to be competing with the most simple of all messages: Thou shalt not kill.
Leonid Bershidsky
- As a Former Defense Minister Revolts in Ukraine, Is Zelensky’s System Fracturing?Commentary
The greater threat to Zelensky comes not from Fedorov alone, but from the convergence between the former defense minister’s political campaign and the anti-corruption investigations moving ever closer to the presidential administration.
Balázs Jarábik
- Kremlin’s Wartime Censorship Could Prove Fatal for Russia’s Beleaguered Book IndustryCommentary
Political pressure and economic headwinds are closely intertwined problems for Russian publishers and booksellers. Together, they risk propelling Russia into a “post-literate” era.
Galina Yuzefovich
- Russia’s Rubber-Stamp Duma Elections Are Exposing Schisms in Putin's RegimeCommentary
In the discussions made possible by the State Duma election campaign, one question is being asked more and more loudly. “What next?”
Andrey Pertsev