Roundtable: Making Nuclear Injustice an Agenda for Change

{
  "authors": [
    "Ulrich Kühn"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ]
}

In The Media

Roundtable: Making Nuclear Injustice an Agenda for Change

For this roundtable, we invited four scholars, practitioners, and abolition advocates to further articulate what a research agenda on nuclear injustice should look like.

By Ulrich Kühn

Published on Feb 2, 2023

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

About the Author

Ulrich Kühn

Former Nonresident Scholar, Nuclear Policy Program

Ulrich Kühn was a nonresident scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and the head of the arms control and emerging technologies program at the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg.

Recent Work

Commentary
Why Arms Control Is (Almost) Dead
- Ulrich Kühn
Report
Preventing Escalation in the Baltics: A NATO Playbook
- Ulrich Kühn

Political Reform Security Nuclear Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Ten Years After Karimov’s Death, How Much Has Uzbekistan Really Changed?
In the tenth year of his presidency, President Mirziyoyev’s system is becoming even more personalized than that of his predecessor Karimov.
Galiya Ibragimova
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
As It Turns 25, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Reflects the New World Order
With the growth in points of friction between the great powers, organizations like the SCO will continue to play a role in the strategic adaptation of the smaller powers caught between them.
Temur Umarov
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
As a Former Defense Minister Revolts in Ukraine, Is Zelensky’s System Fracturing?
The greater threat to Zelensky comes not from Fedorov alone, but from the convergence between the former defense minister’s political campaign and the anti-corruption investigations moving ever closer to the presidential administration.
Balázs Jarábik
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Fedorov’s Challenge to Zelensky Could Upend Ukrainian Politics
With his public call for new elections in Ukraine, ex-defense minister Mykhailo Fedorov has opened Pandora’s box.
Konstantin Skorkin
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Russia’s Rubber-Stamp Duma Elections Are Exposing Schisms in Putin's Regime
In the discussions made possible by the State Duma election campaign, one question is being asked more and more loudly. “What next?”
Andrey Pertsev

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Ten Years After Karimov’s Death, How Much Has Uzbekistan Really Changed?

In the tenth year of his presidency, President Mirziyoyev’s system is becoming even more personalized than that of his predecessor Karimov.

Galiya Ibragimova

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

As It Turns 25, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Reflects the New World Order

With the growth in points of friction between the great powers, organizations like the SCO will continue to play a role in the strategic adaptation of the smaller powers caught between them.

Temur Umarov

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

As a Former Defense Minister Revolts in Ukraine, Is Zelensky’s System Fracturing?

The greater threat to Zelensky comes not from Fedorov alone, but from the convergence between the former defense minister’s political campaign and the anti-corruption investigations moving ever closer to the presidential administration.