• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Article

An American Patriot

Charles E. Bennett was a war hero, a man of deep religious belief, a southern conservative Democrat, and a member of the House of Representatives for 44 years. He believed in a strong military, large defense budgets, a powerful Navy and integrity in government.

Link Copied
By Joseph Cirincione
Published on Nov 6, 2003

This is not an analysis. It is a tribute. On November 6 at Arlington National Cemetery, family and friends gathered for the funeral of former Congressman Charles E. Bennett. He was a war hero, a man of deep religious belief, a southern conservative Democrat, and a member of the House of Representatives for 44 years. He believed in a strong military, large defense budgets, a powerful Navy and integrity in government. He opposed wasteful spending, the B-2 bomber, the MX missile and the Star Wars program. He had no use for nuclear weapons, saying we would never use them and they sucked money away from the weapons troops really needed. He never took a gift from a defense contractor, fought to close the corrupting revolving door between government and industry, and legislated tough, realistic tests for all weapon programs.

Charles Bennett gave up a law practice in Jacksonville, Florida, shunned a chance to be a Navy officer and enlisted in the Army in World War II. He led a band of guerrilla fighters behind enemy lines in the Philippines. When he came out of the jungle, he had contracted polio. Told he would never walk again, Bennett refused to accept the doctors' diagnosis. After two years of grueling therapy, he strapped on braces, used two canes and ran for Congress. He entered the House in 1949, the year I was born. The defense budget was then $13 billion. President Truman had him for dinner at the White House. He became friends with another newcomer to the House and a young veteran from Massachusetts, John Kennedy.

I had the honor of working for Congressman Bennett for six years on the House Armed Services Committee, beginning in 1985. He treated me like a son. The feeling was mutual; he was the same age my father would have been had he lived. During that time, Bennett was asked to chair the Military Reform Caucus with Congressman Tom Ridge. The two former infantrymen (Ridge served with honor in Vietnam) became good friends, both dedicated to making sure the troops had the best weapons possible for the job they had to do. Together, they supported rigorous operational weapon testing, including the revolutionary concept of live-fire testing-making sure that all our weapons were tested under combat conditions before they were handed over to the troops. They fought to change the design and improve the armor on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, saying it put troops at unnecessary risk without protecting them from cheap, plentiful rocket-fired grenades-the weapons now blowing up Bradleys in Baghdad. Bennett could not stop the Star Wars program, but he saved taxpayers billions by successfully leading a bi-partisan effort with Ridge to cut its budget five years in a row.

The two votes he said he always regretted were his vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and his vote for the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.

With the Cold War ending, Bennett wrote an op-ed in 1990 with his vision of the world we could create:

"We want to reduce the number of weapons of mass destruction. Though the emotional intensity devoted to this goal has varied, it remains one of our key national security concerns. Now, after decades of fearful competition, we are working to implement what used to be considered radical proposals: eliminating chemical and biological weapons, and cutting in half American and Soviet strategic nuclear weapons.

"While we must maintain adequate conventional forces to protect ourselves and or allies, the kind of force we need is about to change radically.It will be a military devoted as much to maintaining peace through verification of arms control treaties as sustaining big armies poised for combat.This cooperation should set the tone for the world of the 1990s. It is, after all, the kind of world America wants: to be cooperating with the Soviet Union and other nations in the amelioration of the evils of poverty, malnutrition, illiteracy, overpopulation, and air and water pollution."

Those are his words, not an aide's. He never got to see that world fully realized, but he never lost the vision.

In the end, Charles Bennett got great care at the nursing home in Jacksonville. Not because he was a former congressman, but because everyone on staff knew someone who at sometime in their life had been helped by Charlie Bennett.

He had a military honor guard at his funeral. Horses drew a casket through the November drizzle, troops stood at attention, firing their rifles in salute. His braces gone, they interred his ashes in a place of honor, surrounded by thousands of other veterans. The minister quoted St. Paul's words, "I have fought the good fight. I have finished the race. I have kept the faith."

That was Charles E. Bennett.

About the Author

Joseph Cirincione

Former Senior Associate, Director for NonProliferation

    Recent Work

  • Report
    Universal Compliance: A Strategy for Nuclear Security<br>With 2007 Report Card on Progress
      • +2

      George Perkovich, Jessica Tuchman Mathews, Joseph Cirincione, …

  • Article
    The End of Neoconservatism

      Joseph Cirincione

Joseph Cirincione
Former Senior Associate, Director for NonProliferation
Joseph Cirincione
North AmericaUnited StatesPolitical Reform

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    How Far Can Russian Arms Help Iran?

    Arms supplies from Russia to Iran will not only continue, but could grow significantly if Russia gets the opportunity.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced Voting

    The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.

      Andrey Pertsev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Notes From Kyiv: Is Ukraine Preparing for Elections?

    As discussions about settlement and elections move from speculation to preparation, Kyiv will have to manage not only the battlefield, but also the terms of political transition. The thaw will not resolve underlying tensions; it will only expose them more clearly.

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Where Does the Split in the Ruling Tandem Leave Kyrgyzstan?

    Despite its reputation as an island of democracy in Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan appears to be on the brink of becoming a personalist autocracy.

      Temur Umarov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    In Uzbekistan, the President’s Daughter Is Now His Second-in-Command

    Having failed to build a team that he can fully trust or establish strong state institutions, Mirziyoyev has become reliant on his family.

      Galiya Ibragimova

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.