• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Western Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Press Release: Russia and the E.U.: What Makes a "Strategic Partnership?"

The Carnegie Endowment announces a Carnegie Paper by visiting scholar Rolf Schuette that argues that relations between the E.U. and Russia cannot develop into a full-fledged "strategic partnership," if they are based only on common interests and not also on common values and mutual trust.

Link Copied
Published on Dec 21, 2004

Contact: Carmen MacDougall, 202-939-2319, cmacdougall@CarnegieEndowment.org

For Immediate Release: December 21, 2004

This fall European criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s policies reached a new high, as critics saw the political measures he announced after the Beslan terrorist attack as exploiting the events to further curtail democracy. Doubts about Russia’s commitment to “common European values,” one of the bedrocks of the partnership between the two actors, are gaining momentum. Visiting scholar Rolf Schuette argues that relations between the E.U. and Russia cannot develop into a full-fledged “strategic partnership,” if they are based only on common interests and not also on common values and mutual trust. Read E.U. - Russia Relations: Interests and Values – A European Perspective here.

The Carnegie Paper reviews E.U.-Russia relations from a European perspective, examining how the common values of democracy, human rights, and rule of law have figured in the relationship. The first section analyzes the formulation of E.U. policy towards Russia and then outlines the structure and four main areas of E.U.-Russian cooperation. Schuette points out that the E.U. and Russia have a unique relationship based on years of intensive dialogue and geographical proximity. Natural partners, they complement each other most clearly in the areas of trade, investment and energy. Though recent developments seem discouraging, the E.U. should not give up its efforts to counter troublesome trends that contradict the common values to which Russia previously committed.

Specifically, Schuette suggests that the E.U. send a clear, consistent message in its dialogue with Russia, saying that:

  • Dialogue and cooperation will continue. There will be no return to Cold War antagonism.
  • Both sides can discuss any concern brought to the table. No matter can be vetoed.
  • Russia can expect support in its fight against terrorism, but not a “discount” when it disregards human rights in Chechnya or uses terrorism as a pretext for curbing democracy.
  • The E.U. will continue to raise concerns about Russia’s violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms in appropriate international forums.
  • Respect for Russia comes only when it complies with the common European values.

Rolf Schuette was a visiting scholar in the Russia and Eurasia Program at the Carnegie Endowment during the fall of 2004. He is a career diplomat in the German Foreign Service and was also the head of the Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova division in the Foreign Office in Berlin. The paper expresses his personal opinion and not official position.

Political ReformSecurityForeign PolicyCaucasusRussiaEastern EuropeWestern Europe

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Malaysia’s Year as ASEAN Chair: Managing Disorder

    Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Neither Comrade nor Ally: Decoding Vietnam’s First Army Drill with China

    In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

  • Commentary
    China’s Mediation Offer in the Thailand-Cambodia Border Dispute Sheds Light on Beijing’s Security Role in Southeast Asia

    The Thai-Cambodian conflict highlights the limits to China's peacemaker ambition and the significance of this role on Southeast Asia’s balance of power.

      Pongphisoot (Paul) Busbarat

  • Trump and Xi on a red background
    Commentary
    Emissary
    China Is Determined to Hold Firm Against Trump’s Pressure

    Beijing believes that Washington is overestimating its own leverage and its ability to handle the trade war’s impacts. 

      • Sheena Chestnut Greitens

      Rick Waters, Sheena Chestnut Greitens

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.