But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"United States",
"Caucasus",
"Eastern Europe",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}REQUIRED IMAGE
The Carnegie Endowment announced the launch of the Euro–Atlantic Security Initiative (EASI), a two-year Commission to build the intellectual framework for an inclusive transatlantic security system for the 21st century.
BRUSSELS, Dec 10—The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace today announced the launch of the Euro–Atlantic Security Initiative (EASI), a two-year Commission to build the intellectual framework for an inclusive transatlantic security system for the 21st century.
Co-chaired by Wolfgang Ischinger, former German deputy foreign minister and ambassador to the United States, Igor Ivanov, former foreign minister of Russia, and Sam Nunn, former chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Commission has assembled distinguished public figures from the former ranks of government, business, and academia.
Making the announcement the three co-chairs said:
“Twenty years ago, the fall of the Berlin Wall promised great hope that Cold War divides would vanish, ushering in a new era of peace and security based on what Mikhail Gorbachev called a 'common European home,' and George H. W. Bush called a 'Europe whole and free.'
“Over the intervening years this moment never arrived, but neither has the hope died. Over the next two years, in consultation with experts and policy makers from Europe, Russia, its neighbors, and the United States, we will look comprehensively at the full range of security challenges facing our nations, assess the existing institutions to cope with them, and recommend steps by which the great swath of nations from the Atlantic to the Urals could be transformed into a genuinely common security space.”
Jessica Mathews, president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, added:
“Throughout its 99-year history, the Endowment has initiated and supported many independent international initiatives ranging from international conciliation to financial reconstruction to the founding of new institutions.
“Today, Carnegie is uniquely placed as a global institution with the ability to bring together perspectives through our operations in Europe, Russia, and the United States to address this central security challenge of the new century. Creative thinking from all quarters will be essential if we are to clarify the root of our differences and to develop a framework for future positive cooperation.”
###
NOTES
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian
Hanoi and Beijing have long treated each other as distant cousins rather than comrades in arms. That might be changing as both sides draw closer to hedge against uncertainty and America’s erratic behavior.
Nguyễn Khắc Giang
Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.
Damien Ma
Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.
Elina Noor