For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.
Elina Noor
{
"authors": [
"Kevin Jianjun Tu",
"Adnan Vatansever"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "SCP",
"programs": [
"Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China",
"Caucasus",
"Russia",
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Climate Change"
]
}Source: Getty
China and Russia must find a way to balance the competing policy challenges of economic development, energy security, and environmental integrity.
Source: New York Times Energy for Tomorrow Conference
At the New York Times Energy for Tomorrow Conferece, Carnegie's Kevin Tu and Adnan Vatansever discussed how China and Russia can balance the competing policy challenges of economic development, energy security, and environmental integrity.
Tu explained that coal will remain China’s leading source of energy for at least the next five years. Making China’s coal value chain—from coal mining to transport to end-use—more efficient, safe, and environmentally benign has the potential to significantly reduce China’s emissions. To successfully tackle the challenges of economic development, energy security, and environmental integrity, Chinese decision-makers should abandon their developing country mentality, and instead focus more on collaboration with other major economies, mainly the United States, Russia, and Europe, he concluded.
Vatansever stated that Russia, which is tied with Saudi Arabia as the world’s biggest oil producer and tied with the United States as the world’s largest gas producer, has the potential to save more oil than the United Kingdom consumes in a year by raising its energy efficiency level to the OECD average. Furthermore, Russia's role as a global energy supplier in the future will be determined by its ability to develop the next generation of oil and gas fields. The structure of the current tax system, the government’s dependence on oil and gas revenue, and the uncertainty regarding foreign investment in the oil and gas sector pose three major challenges for this development, he concluded.
While Beijing is taking climate change very seriously and has introduced a 17 percent carbon intensity reduction goal in its 12th Five Year Plan as well as a national climate change adaptation strategy, Moscow's view on climate change is still one of skepticism, the scholars explained. Tied with India as the world’s third largest emitter of greenhouse gases, Russia’s biggest climate change mitigation potential lies in energy efficiency gains.
Former Senior Associate , Energy and Climate Program
Tu was a senior associate in Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program, where he led the organization’s work on China’s energy and climate policies.
Former Senior Associate, Energy and Climate Program
Vatansever was a senior associate in the Energy and Climate Program where he specializes in the energy sectors of the former Soviet republics and Eastern Europe.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.
Elina Noor
ASEAN needs to determine how to balance perpetuating the benefits of technology cooperation with China while mitigating the risks of getting caught in the crosshairs of U.S.-China gamesmanship.
Elina Noor
In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.
Nguyễn Khắc Giang
Regulation, not embargo, allows Beijing to shape how other countries and firms adapt to its terms.
Alvin Camba
Rather than climate ambitions, compatibility with investment and exports is why China supports both green and high-emission technologies.
Mathias Larsen