• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Kevin Jianjun Tu",
    "Adnan Vatansever"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SCP",
  "programs": [
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other

Energy for Tomorrow

China and Russia must find a way to balance the competing policy challenges of economic development, energy security, and environmental integrity.

Link Copied
By Kevin Jianjun Tu and Adnan Vatansever
Published on Apr 11, 2012

Source: New York Times Energy for Tomorrow Conference

At the New York Times Energy for Tomorrow Conferece, Carnegie's Kevin Tu and Adnan Vatansever discussed how China and Russia can balance the competing policy challenges of economic development, energy security, and environmental integrity.

Tu explained that coal will remain China’s leading source of energy for at least the next five years. Making China’s coal value chain—from coal mining to transport to end-use—more efficient, safe, and environmentally benign has the potential to significantly reduce China’s emissions. To successfully tackle the challenges of economic development, energy security, and environmental integrity, Chinese decision-makers should abandon their developing country mentality, and instead focus more on collaboration with other major economies, mainly the United States, Russia, and Europe, he concluded.

Vatansever stated that Russia, which is tied with Saudi Arabia as the world’s biggest oil producer and tied with the United States as the world’s largest gas producer, has the potential to save more oil than the United Kingdom consumes in a year by raising its energy efficiency level to the OECD average. Furthermore, Russia's role as a global energy supplier in the future will be determined by its ability to develop the next generation of oil and gas fields. The structure of the current tax system, the government’s dependence on oil and gas revenue, and the uncertainty regarding foreign investment in the oil and gas sector pose three major challenges for this development, he concluded.

While Beijing is taking climate change very seriously and has introduced a 17 percent carbon intensity reduction goal in its 12th Five Year Plan as well as a national climate change adaptation strategy, Moscow's view on climate change is still one of skepticism, the scholars explained. Tied with India as the world’s third largest emitter of greenhouse gases, Russia’s biggest climate change mitigation potential lies in energy efficiency gains.

About the Authors

Kevin Jianjun Tu

Former Senior Associate , Energy and Climate Program

Tu was a senior associate in Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program, where he led the organization’s work on China’s energy and climate policies.

Adnan Vatansever

Former Senior Associate, Energy and Climate Program

Vatansever was a senior associate in the Energy and Climate Program where he specializes in the energy sectors of the former Soviet republics and Eastern Europe.

Authors

Kevin Jianjun Tu
Former Senior Associate , Energy and Climate Program
Kevin Jianjun Tu
Adnan Vatansever
Former Senior Associate, Energy and Climate Program
Adnan Vatansever
Climate ChangeEast AsiaChinaCaucasusRussiaNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    ASEAN-China Digital Cooperation: Deeper but Clear-Eyed Engagement

    ASEAN needs to determine how to balance perpetuating the benefits of technology cooperation with China while mitigating the risks of getting caught in the crosshairs of U.S.-China gamesmanship.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Neither Comrade nor Ally: Decoding Vietnam’s First Army Drill with China

    In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

  • Commentary
    Today’s Rare Earths Conflict Echoes the 1973 Oil Crisis — But It’s Not the Same

    Regulation, not embargo, allows Beijing to shape how other countries and firms adapt to its terms.

      Alvin Camba

  • Commentary
    How China’s Growth Model Determines Its Climate Performance

    Rather than climate ambitions, compatibility with investment and exports is why China supports both green and high-emission technologies.

      Mathias Larsen

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.