Commentary
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
{
"authors": [
"Vladimir Dvorkin"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Russia",
"Eastern Europe",
"Ukraine"
],
"topics": [
"Security",
"Military",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Who Benefits From Ending Russian-Ukrainian Cooperation in the Space and Defense Sectors?
The Russian government’s decision to end cooperation with Ukraine on two space launch programs is likely due to political motivations alone and goes against the economic and technological interests of Russia, Ukraine, and many other countries. This decision is worth reconsidering.
By Vladimir Dvorkin
Published on Mar 16, 2015
Until recently, the space and defense sector was one of the few remaining mutually beneficial areas of cooperation between Russia and Ukraine. But in early-February, Russia announced that it would suspend cooperation with Ukraine on the Dnepr program which uses converted SS-18 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) manufactured at the Dnipropetrovsk Yuzhmash plant to launch commercial satellites. Russian officials also announced that they would no longer buy Yuzhmash-made Zenit booster rockets used in the Sea Launch project. This decision is likely to hurt not only Ukrainian, but Russian interests as well.
The Russian-Ukrainian-Kazakhstani Dnepr Program
The Dnepr project is the most successful defense-industrial conversion projects of the post-Cold War era that has benefited Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, as well as a host of state and commercial interests in Europe, the United States, and elsewhere around the world. The project utilizes converted Soviet-era R-36 ICBM known in the West as SS-18 to launch commercial payloads into space. The legacy project of the Soviet defense-industrial complex scattered across Ukraine, Russia, and Kazakhstan is an example of everyone winning as a result of multilateral cooperation in space and on Earth.The Dnepr program owes its success to several factors. Its launch vehicle can remain on the launch site for a long period of time, thus allowing for rapid launch even in challenging weather conditions at any time of the day or season. It has been exceptionally reliable, and greatly reduced the cost of putting a payload into space.
The first launch of a Dnepr launch vehicle took place in April 1999. From then until November 2013, 18 launches were carried out using R-36M rockets, putting a total of 86 satellites in orbit. The launch vehicle’s large payload—up to 4 tons—and reliability made it an attractive choice for governments and commercial customers. One recent launch put 24 satellites into orbit all at once. Customers for the Dnepr launch service have included space agencies and private companies from 19 countries, including Russia, Ukraine, the UK, the United States, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Germany, and France.
The program has brought tens of millions of dollars in revenue to Ukraine’s premier defense-industrial enterprise—the Yuzhmash plant in Dnipropetrovsk. Had it not been for the launch business, the factory would have shut down long ago due to the lack of orders. Following the announcement by Russia to suspend its cooperation with Yuzhmash, the factory has furloughed thousands of workers. The program has also benefited Kazakhstan, whose Baikonur space launch facility has been used for multiple launches.
The program has also resulted in significant benefits for Russia. In addition to commercial benefits for Russia from the space launch program, it made it possible for the Strategic Rocket Forces (SRF) to extend the service life of the SS-18 ICBM. The space launch vehicles and the SS-18 ICBMs share a number of systems and components, and the continuing manufacture of these components has made it possible for the SRF to keep the SS-18s in service.
Yuzhmash is not the only Ukrainian defense enterprise to have benefited from this cooperation. The Kharkiv-based Khartron-Arkos electronics plant has supplied both the Dnepr and the SS-18 programs with guidance systems. Since 1999, Khartron-Arkos has greatly improved the rocket’s guidance system, thereby satellite launch accuracy.
Although the loss of contracts with Russia is likely to hurt Yuzhmash, it appears likely to recover from this setback. The company has a contract with the U.S. Orbital Sciences Corporation to build the first stage of the Antares launch vehicle (a 1.9-billion dollars contract through 2018); with the Brazilian Space Agency to develop the Cyclone-4 launch vehicle; with the European Space Agency to participate in the Vega space launch system project; as well as with several other countries.
The Zenit Launch Vehicle Project
Russian decision to stop buying Zenit launch vehicles from Ukraine is likely to hurt Russian interests as well. Established in 1995 as a joint Russia-Ukraine-U.S.-Norway venture called Sea Launch, the company has used the Zenit 3SL launch vehicle, designed and built by Yuzhmash to launch satellites from a sea platform, as well as from the Baikonur space launch facility in Kazkahstan.
From March 1999 to May 2014, Sea Launch carried out a total of 36 launches. The program suffered several setbacks when three launches failed in 2000, 2007, and 2013, but the problems were identified and fixed, as was subsequently demonstrated by the successful launch of an Israeli satellite from Baikonur in September 2013. At least five launches were planned for 2014-2015, but only one was carried out in 2014.
Sea Launch has also experienced financial difficulties and had to file for bankruptcy in 2009. It emerged from bankruptcy in 2010, but reportedly its future is still in question.
It would make sense for Russia to help Sea Launch resolve its financial difficulties. The project offers the possibility of using a launch vehicle and platform for Russian military and civilian satellites, as well as international commercial satellites. Moreover, future joint projects could include the use of Zenit rockets for manned space flight. Such cooperation can benefit both countries. Yuzhmash remains an important potential partner with a vast unrealized potential for Russian defense and space industries. Russia should do everything within its powers to sustain this cooperation.
Russian official statements about the intended replacement of Zenit with the Angara launch vehicle are overly optimistic and premature. So far, only two launches of the Angara have been carried out, and it is not yet certain that the launch vehicle and its supporting infrastructure can be used with confidence.
The Russian government’s decision to end cooperation with Ukraine on these two space launch programs is likely due to political motivations alone and goes against the economic and technological interests of Russia, Ukraine, and many other countries that rely on the Dnepr and Zenit launch vehicles. This decision is worth reconsidering.
About the Author
Vladimir Dvorkin
Major General Dvorkin (retired) is a chief researcher at the Center for International Security at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of Stability
- China Sells Stability Amid American VolatilityCommentary
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian
- Why Vietnam Is Swinging in China’s DirectionCommentary
Hanoi and Beijing have long treated each other as distant cousins rather than comrades in arms. That might be changing as both sides draw closer to hedge against uncertainty and America’s erratic behavior.
Nguyễn Khắc Giang
- China’s Energy Security Doesn’t Run Through Hormuz but Through the Electrification of EverythingCommentary
Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.
Damien Ma
- Malaysia’s Year as ASEAN Chair: Managing DisorderCommentary
Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.
Elina Noor
