• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Mark Hibbs"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "U.S. Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "South Asia",
    "Pakistan",
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Asia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Nuclear Policy",
    "Nuclear Energy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

China Can't Break the Rules

Chinese plans to flout global rules on nuclear trade by building two reactors in Pakistan are emblematic of Beijing's growing nuclear assertiveness and threatens to undermine the nonproliferation regime.

Link Copied
By Mark Hibbs
Published on Aug 20, 2010

Source: International Herald Tribune

China Can't Break the RulesThe United States and the 45 other countries that set the global rules on nuclear trade expect to be confronted with Chinese plans to flout those rules by building two reactors in Pakistan. The looming deal is emblematic of Beijing’s growing nuclear assertiveness and also threatens to undermine global nonproliferation efforts championed by President Obama. Washington should be critical of this transaction, but more importantly, the United States should use this opportunity to hold bilateral talks with China on nuclear trade, security and nonproliferation issues.

Beijing has a long history of supporting Pakistan’s nuclear program. But in 2004, China joined the Nuclear Suppliers Group (N.S.G.), the rulemaking body for nuclear trade, and agreed to halt nuclear commerce with states outside the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, including Pakistan.

China’s export plans for Pakistan surfaced in February, after the U.S. concluded a civil nuclear deal with India, which, like Pakistan, has not signed the Nonproliferation Treaty. Washington arm-twisted other N.S.G. states, including China, to tolerate the deal and now U.S. companies will sell reactors to India.

The N.S.G.’s approval of commerce with India gave China an excuse to export more reactors to Pakistan. Beijing has three options: It can follow the U.S.-India example and request an exemption for Pakistan; it can claim that new exports are “grandfathered” by a pre-2004 China-Pakistan agreement and don’t violate the N.S.G. rules; or it can ignore the voluntary guidelines.

Washington’s position on the transaction has hardened. In June, U.S. officials told the N.S.G. that Washington would object if Beijing claimed that trade with Pakistan was grandfathered and that China should seek an exemption from group regulations. Last month, the State Department went further, telling lawmakers that the U.S. would also object should China seek an exemption.

Washington’s resolve not to rubber-stamp the export to Pakistan is a good sign. But it does not know how Beijing will respond to its latest stance. Diplomats from other N.S.G. countries say the matter is delicate because China approved Washington’s deal with India and expects reciprocity or a “face saver.”

Some group representatives hope that Washington’s opposition is an opening gambit toward a discussion with China. Talks could cover the terms under which the United States could eventually support a Chinese exemption; U.S. incentives to get China to better control nuclear exports; and Chinese support for a treaty designed to halt production of nuclear material for weapons.

N.S.G. representatives are also concerned that if Washington slams the door, Beijing could quit the group. China is investing billions on a civilian nuclear build-up. With over 60 percent of the world’s reactors under construction in China, the prospect of Beijing leaving the world’s nuclear trade regime is unsettling. The worst scenario is that a booming Chinese nuclear juggernaut unfettered by N.S.G. guidelines would spawn an impenetrable black market. So the U.S. and the N.S.G. need China to play by the rules — but also to remain in the N.S.G.

Washington has successfully pushed back against Chinese nuclear exports before by using carrots and sticks. China wants to build over 60 reactors. This is only possible if foreign companies continue to cooperate with Chinese ones. China also aims to export nuclear reactors, to Argentina, among others. Since Argentina is in the Nonproliferation Treaty, the export would conform to guidelines. But China would need approval from the foreign firms that designed the reactor. Bottom line: Nuclear suppliers have leverage over China.

Pakistan has massive energy problems, but building two small Chinese reactors, which Pakistan can scarcely afford, won’t quickly bring relief.

Unless diplomacy can circumvent the deal, it will be discussed during the N.S.G.’s November meeting. In the meantime, U.S. officials must show Beijing that there are better options than violating the rules, but avoid isolating China’s nuclear program.

In 10 years China could be the world’s biggest generator of nuclear power after the United States. It intends to become a major commercial plutonium hub and may develop a uranium enrichment industry. Beijing will clearly be a key player in preventing nuclear proliferation. It’s time for direct engagement — and it’s an opportune time to start.

About the Author

Mark Hibbs

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Nuclear Policy Program

Hibbs is a Germany-based nonresident senior fellow in Carnegie’s Nuclear Policy Program. His areas of expertise are nuclear verification and safeguards, multilateral nuclear trade policy, international nuclear cooperation, and nonproliferation arrangements.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Dimming Prospects for U.S.-Russia Nonproliferation Cooperation
      • Nicole Grajewski Profile Picture
      • +1

      Toby Dalton, Mark Hibbs, Nicole Grajewski, …

  • Commentary
    What Comes After Russia’s Attack on a Ukrainian Nuclear Power Station?

      Mark Hibbs

Mark Hibbs
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Nuclear Policy Program
Mark Hibbs
Nuclear PolicyNuclear EnergyNorth AmericaUnited StatesSouth AsiaPakistanEast AsiaChinaAsia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU Needs a Third Way in Iran

    European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.

      Richard Youngs

  • Trump United Nations multilateralism institutions 2236462680
    Article
    Resetting Cyber Relations with the United States

    For years, the United States anchored global cyber diplomacy. As Washington rethinks its leadership role, the launch of the UN’s Cyber Global Mechanism may test how allies adjust their engagement.

      • Christopher Painter

      Patryk Pawlak, Chris Painter

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

    Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

      Pierre Vimont

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Macron Makes France a Great Middle Power

    France has stopped clinging to notions of being a great power and is embracing the middle power moment. But Emmanuel Macron has his work cut out if he is to secure his country’s global standing before his term in office ends.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Attract Foreign Investment and Reduce Dependencies?

    EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.