• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "David Rothkopf"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

WikiLeaks Shows Out-of-Control US Secrecy

One positive outcome from the recent set of documents released by WikiLeaks would be a comprehensive review and reform of the culture of secrecy that seems to have pervaded the U.S. government.

Link Copied
By David Rothkopf
Published on Nov 29, 2010

Source: The Financial Times

WikiLeaks Shows Out-of-Control US SecrecyThe most obvious lesson from the WikiLeaks episodes is that officials who decry the leaks are right to assert that they illustrate a huge and intolerable security risk. But the risk is not from the leakers. Instead it is from a system, and indeed a culture, of secrecy in the US government that has run utterly out of control.

This is not immediately obvious, because the WikiLeaks affair has stirred up a storm of swirling, competing hypocrisies. On one level we have the hypocrisies revealed in the cables: of allies criticising each other; enemies posing as friends; and leaders pretending to their people that crass, criminal, duplicitous allies can also be dependable friends.

But such deceptions have always been commonplace in diplomacy, and should therefore produce little surprise. They confirm that the world is a nasty place, in which advancing national interests often involves working with bad guys, playing adversaries against one another, and accepting odious behaviour in the hope of avoiding something much worse.

Then there are the billowing hypocrisies surrounding the release of the documents. These include the self-congratulatory arguments of the leakers: from the individual who stole the cables to the reckless team at WikiLeaks that took it upon themselves to make the documents public and in so doing put lives and sensitive operations at risk.

Next come the self-righteous claims of private media organisations, who feel that they can behave within self-determined ethical standards that trump the laws of the countries in which they work. And perhaps most galling of all there are the pious denunciations of government officials who decry the damage done by the leaks, but then defend the much worse damage done by their own policies and actions.

Of course, there are upsides. The leaks inadvertently reveal the formidable courage and capabilities of many diplomats. It should also be clear that a free press has not only the right but the responsibility to shed light in corners of government operations that are kept deliberately dark to cover up misjudgments and wrongdoing.

Yet to prevent further security breaches of this sort, the administration must address their attention not to a single misguided enlisted man, or to a mercurial Internet gadfly. Rather, they must recognise that there cannot be true secrecy in a system in which over 3m people have security clearances.

This is a system in which millions of documents each year are unnecessarily classified – even though, as a top general once asserted to me, well over 95 per cent of the information being classified is already publicly available. In shining a light on this, WikiLeaks fully reveals the perverse and flawed information culture within US government.

The secret to keeping secrets is to have fewer of them, shared among fewer people. And a massive, comprehensive review and reform of how America keeps, shares and thinks about its secrets is one of the few benefits this unfortunate incident could produce.

About the Author

David Rothkopf

Former Visiting Scholar

David Rothkopf was a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment as well as the former CEO and editor in chief of the FP Group.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    How Bush, Obama, and Trump Ended Pax Americana

      David Rothkopf

  • In The Media
    A Bigger Clubhouse

      David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf
Former Visiting Scholar
David Rothkopf
Political ReformNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Ukraine Poland Zelensky Tusk Enlargement EU
    Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Uncomfortable Truth About EU Enlargement

    Before the next wave of EU enlargement takes place, the union needs to grapple with thorny questions of how power is distributed among its members.

      • Ditte Brasso Sørensen

      Emil Sondaj Hansen, Ditte Brasso Sørensen

  • Greenland United States Denmark Agreement Nuuk
    Commentary
    The Denmark-Greenland-U.S. Agreement Needs to Stand the Test of Time

    The new U.S.–Denmark–Greenland agreement will help Washington exert political, economic, and financial dominance under the guise of security. Yet, it acknowledged Copenhagen’s and Nuuk’s sovereignty on the island.

      Marc Pierini

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Speech Ursula von der Leyen Can’t Deliver

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is about to give her annual address on the state of the EU. Here’s what she won’t—but should—say.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Le Pen France Far Right
    Article
    How Europe’s 2027 Elections Could Test EU Governance

    Radical-right parties are expected to do well in upcoming elections in four of the EU's biggest member states. If successful, they could prevent the union from addressing key challenges ahead.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Carney Canada EU Trump
    Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is Canada Leading a Third Way?

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has twice inspired praise for standing up to U.S. President Donald Trump: at the 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos and on Canada-U.S. trade negotiations. Is Carney showing a third way better than the EU has in dealing with the Trump administration?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.