An Update on the Leadership Initiative for Transportation Solvency

{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SCP",
  "programs": [
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Other

An Update on the Leadership Initiative for Transportation Solvency

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform's final report outlines recommendations for reining in the U.S. deficit by 2015, including suggestions for the nation's transportation program.

Published on Jan 12, 2011

Source: January 12

On December 1, 2010, Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles, co-chairs of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, released final recommendations for reining in the U.S. deficit by 2015. The report, The Moment of Truth, addressed all aspects of the budget, including the country’s transportation program. The proposal included input from the eighteen commission members but was based on the earlier Co-Chairs’ Proposal, released in November 2010.

All four recommendations submitted to the commission by the co-chairs of the Carnegie Endowment’s Leadership Initiative on Transportation Solvency were included in the commission’s final report. Below is a summary of how the recommendations for reforming and raising revenue for the U.S. transportation program—made by the Initiative’s co-chairs, the Honorable Bill Bradley, the Honorable Tom Ridge, and the Honorable David Walker—correspond to recommendations in The Moment of Truth.

Though eleven commission members endorsed the report—more than half of all members—they fell three votes short of the support needed to force a Congressional vote on the report. This proposal will remain salient, however, as the new Congress considers the growing budget, the debt ceiling, and the reauthorization of the transportation bill in 2011.

Leadership Initiative Recommendations November 2010	Fiscal Responsibility Commission Proposal December 2010
End Wasteful Spending on Existing Surface Transportation Accounts	“Before asking taxpayers to pay more for roads, rail, bridges, and infrastructure, we must ensure existing funds are not wasted. The Commission recommends significant reforms to control federal highway spending.”
Invest in Infrastructure to Grow the Economy	“Congress should limit trust fund spending to the most pressing infrastructure needs rather than forcing states to fund low-priority projects.”
Fully Fund a Reformed Federal Surface Transportation Program with New Revenue Sources	“RECOMMENDATION 1.7: FULLY FUND THE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND INSTEAD OF RELYING ON DEFICIT SPENDING. Dedicate a 15-cent per gallon increase in the gas tax to transportation funding and limit spending if necessary to match the revenue the trust fund collects each year.”
Create a Transportation Realignment and Accountability Commission	“RECOMMENDATION 1.9: Establish a cut-and-invest committee to cut low-priority spending, increase high-priority investment, and consolidate duplicative federal programs.”

Climate Change North America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

Commentary
Strategic Europe
Taking the Pulse: Has Europe Given Up its Leadership on Climate Change?
COP30 takes place amidst increased pessimism about the world’s commitment to energy transition and ecological protection. Beset by a host of other challenges, can Europe still maintain its role as a driver of global climate action?
Thomas de Waal
Commentary
Five Pillars for Europe in the Second Trump Era
The second Trump administration has shifted the cornerstones of the liberal international order. How the EU responds will determine not only its global standing but also the very integrity of the European project.
Rym Momtaz
Article
Confronting Backlash Against Europe’s Green Transition
Greenlash is driven by an increasingly diverse set of actors. It is also prompting groups in favor of ambitious climate action to seek more effective strategies.
Erin Jones, Richard Youngs
Commentary
Strategic Europe
The EU’s 2040 Target Is About Much More Than Just Climate
The EU’s ambition to slash carbon emissions by 90 percent by 2040 is challenged by internal divisions and global turmoil. But this target must cement a new era of European climate action, linked to innovation, competitiveness, and security.
Emil Sondaj Hansen
Paper
Geoengineering: Assessing Risks in the Era of Planetary Security
As the effects of climate change intensify, interest in geoengineering approaches is ramping up. But these methods risk creating new ecological and security threats, undermining urgent systemic transitions.
Olivia Lazard, Mandi Bissett, James Dyke

Leadership Initiative Recommendations
November 2010

Fiscal Responsibility Commission Proposal
December 2010

End Wasteful Spending on Existing Surface Transportation Accounts

“Before asking taxpayers to pay more for roads, rail, bridges, and infrastructure, we must ensure existing funds are not wasted. The Commission recommends significant reforms to control federal highway spending.”

Invest in Infrastructure to Grow the Economy

“Congress should limit trust fund spending to the most pressing infrastructure needs rather than forcing states to fund low-priority projects.”

Fully Fund a Reformed Federal Surface Transportation Program with New Revenue Sources

“RECOMMENDATION 1.7: FULLY FUND THE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND INSTEAD OF RELYING ON DEFICIT SPENDING. Dedicate a 15-cent per gallon increase in the gas tax to transportation funding and limit spending if necessary to match the revenue the trust fund collects each year.”

Create a Transportation Realignment and Accountability Commission

“RECOMMENDATION 1.9: Establish a cut-and-invest committee to cut low-priority spending, increase high-priority investment, and consolidate duplicative federal programs.”

More Work from Carnegie Europe

Commentary

Strategic Europe

Taking the Pulse: Has Europe Given Up its Leadership on Climate Change?

COP30 takes place amidst increased pessimism about the world’s commitment to energy transition and ecological protection. Beset by a host of other challenges, can Europe still maintain its role as a driver of global climate action?

Thomas de Waal

Commentary

Five Pillars for Europe in the Second Trump Era

The second Trump administration has shifted the cornerstones of the liberal international order. How the EU responds will determine not only its global standing but also the very integrity of the European project.

Rym Momtaz

A row of large green trackors drive on a road made for cars. There is a block of apartment buildings in the background

Article

Confronting Backlash Against Europe’s Green Transition

Greenlash is driven by an increasingly diverse set of actors. It is also prompting groups in favor of ambitious climate action to seek more effective strategies.

Erin Jones, Richard Youngs

Commentary

Strategic Europe

The EU’s 2040 Target Is About Much More Than Just Climate

The EU’s ambition to slash carbon emissions by 90 percent by 2040 is challenged by internal divisions and global turmoil. But this target must cement a new era of European climate action, linked to innovation, competitiveness, and security.

Emil Sondaj Hansen

Geoengineering approach Lazard Bissett Dyke

Paper

Geoengineering: Assessing Risks in the Era of Planetary Security

As the effects of climate change intensify, interest in geoengineering approaches is ramping up. But these methods risk creating new ecological and security threats, undermining urgent systemic transitions.

Olivia Lazard, Mandi Bissett, James Dyke