{
"authors": [
"Francis Fukuyama"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"Japan",
"Asia"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Nuclear Energy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Japan's national tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear crisis could provide an opportunity for a new kind of Japanese politics, with the leadership the country needs to endure the sacrifices necessary to ensuring its economic health and survival.
Source: Japan Today
There will be more tragedy in the days to come as bodies are recovered, but also new stories of enormous sacrifices made by people on behalf of their fellow citizens, particularly I suspect at the nuclear power plant. The Japanese people have reacted to this tragedy with great dignity and, despite the circumstances, calm. I am not sure that other societies would react in a similar manner.
The earthquake and tsunami remind us not just about how powerful nature is, but also about the degree to which an advanced technological society becomes dependent on complex systems, and how helpless individuals become when they lose access to cellphones, the Internet or more basic things like electricity and water.
This is not, however, the first time that the Japanese people have had to endure enormous suffering and trauma. This happened at the time of the Great Kanto Earthquake in 1923, and at the conclusion of the Pacific War. In a sense, the Japanese people have been at their best when confronted with setbacks and suffering. They understand how to come together for national renewal, and readily undertake a spirit of self-sacrifice for the common good.
My hope is that this national tragedy will be the occasion for a new kind of Japanese politics. In recent years, Japan has suffered from the infighting of a political class that has been much more interested in scoring points against rivals for short-term gain, rather than trying to work seriously with one another to solve Japan’s serious long-term challenges. In this respect, they are behaving very much like their American counterparts, who have been polarized and ineffective in dealing with the country’s long-term problems.
Japan is the first developed country that will face the fact of population aging and decline, and all of the economic and fiscal challenges that come with it. What Japan has needed, but has not had, is political leadership that can rise above the petty wrangling and lead the nation toward the kinds of common sacrifices that will be needed to restore the nation’s long-term economic health.
It is an unfortunate fact about human nature that it sometimes takes a major trauma to waken people from the complacency of business as usual. Responding in the short term to the tsunami will test everyone’s resilience, but it may pave the way toward a stronger sense of national purpose that will last beyond the immediate crisis. If that happens, then the suffering of those affected by this disaster will not have been entirely in vain.
Former Nonresident Scholar, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program
Francis Fukuyama was a nonresident scholar in Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program, where his research focuses on democratization and international political economy.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
When the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding was announced, the UK, France, Germany, and Italy declared their readiness to help demine the Strait of Hormuz and lift nuclear sanctions on Tehran. But does Europe need new tools to recover a diplomatic role?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
Amid uncertainty caused by the Iran war, the global drive for nonproliferation has stalled. With Europe diplomatically marginalized and countries reassessing their nuclear options, efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons risk becoming irrelevant.
Jane Darby Menton
French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
For years, the United States anchored global cyber diplomacy. As Washington rethinks its leadership role, the launch of the UN’s Cyber Global Mechanism may test how allies adjust their engagement.
Patryk Pawlak, Chris Painter
Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.
Pierre Vimont