• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUNATO
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Kevin Jianjun Tu",
    "Adnan Vatansever"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SCP",
  "programs": [
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other

Energy for Tomorrow

China and Russia must find a way to balance the competing policy challenges of economic development, energy security, and environmental integrity.

Link Copied
By Kevin Jianjun Tu and Adnan Vatansever
Published on Apr 11, 2012

Source: New York Times Energy for Tomorrow Conference

At the New York Times Energy for Tomorrow Conferece, Carnegie's Kevin Tu and Adnan Vatansever discussed how China and Russia can balance the competing policy challenges of economic development, energy security, and environmental integrity.

Tu explained that coal will remain China’s leading source of energy for at least the next five years. Making China’s coal value chain—from coal mining to transport to end-use—more efficient, safe, and environmentally benign has the potential to significantly reduce China’s emissions. To successfully tackle the challenges of economic development, energy security, and environmental integrity, Chinese decision-makers should abandon their developing country mentality, and instead focus more on collaboration with other major economies, mainly the United States, Russia, and Europe, he concluded.

Vatansever stated that Russia, which is tied with Saudi Arabia as the world’s biggest oil producer and tied with the United States as the world’s largest gas producer, has the potential to save more oil than the United Kingdom consumes in a year by raising its energy efficiency level to the OECD average. Furthermore, Russia's role as a global energy supplier in the future will be determined by its ability to develop the next generation of oil and gas fields. The structure of the current tax system, the government’s dependence on oil and gas revenue, and the uncertainty regarding foreign investment in the oil and gas sector pose three major challenges for this development, he concluded.

While Beijing is taking climate change very seriously and has introduced a 17 percent carbon intensity reduction goal in its 12th Five Year Plan as well as a national climate change adaptation strategy, Moscow's view on climate change is still one of skepticism, the scholars explained. Tied with India as the world’s third largest emitter of greenhouse gases, Russia’s biggest climate change mitigation potential lies in energy efficiency gains.

About the Authors

Kevin Jianjun Tu

Former Senior Associate , Energy and Climate Program

Tu was a senior associate in Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program, where he led the organization’s work on China’s energy and climate policies.

Adnan Vatansever

Former Senior Associate, Energy and Climate Program

Vatansever was a senior associate in the Energy and Climate Program where he specializes in the energy sectors of the former Soviet republics and Eastern Europe.

Authors

Kevin Jianjun Tu
Former Senior Associate , Energy and Climate Program
Kevin Jianjun Tu
Adnan Vatansever
Former Senior Associate, Energy and Climate Program
Adnan Vatansever
Climate ChangeEast AsiaChinaCaucasusRussiaNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe Should Not Let Nuclear Nonproliferation Die

    Amid uncertainty caused by the Iran war, the global drive for nonproliferation has stalled. With Europe diplomatically marginalized and countries reassessing their nuclear options, efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons risk becoming irrelevant.

      • Jane Darby Menton

      Jane Darby Menton

  • Commentary
    Can Europe Compete with the United States and China?

    Between the United States’ market-driven approach and China's state-led industrial strategy, Europe is reckoning with how it can remain competitive in the global economy. But is Europe in danger of becoming a U.S. or China colony?

      Noah Barkin, Anu Bradford

  • Climate desalination plant Saudi Arabia
    Paper
    Ecological Statecraft in the Midst of War: Water, Regeneration, and the Future of Gulf Security

    The U.S.-Iran war has crossed a dangerous threshold: water infrastructure in the Gulf is now a target. Ecological statecraft is no longer peripheral to security, it's part of its foundations.

      • Ali Bin Shahid

      Olivia Lazard, Ali Bin Shahid

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How the EU Can Become Energy Independent

    The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has triggered a global energy crisis, but Europe is stuck in reaction mode. Without more strategic foresight, the EU will remain dependent on fossil fuels and will never be truly secure.

      Milo McBride, Pauline Gerard

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    There Is No Shortcut for Europe in Armenia

    Europe has an interest in supporting Armenian leader Nikol Pashinyan as he tries to make peace with neighbors and loosen ties with Russia. But it is depersonalized support in the long term, not quickfire flash, that will win the day.

      Thomas de Waal

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.