• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "democracy",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "DCG",
  "programs": [
    "Democracy, Conflict, and Governance",
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Middle East",
    "Iraq"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Press Release: Iraq - Carnegie Endowment President Jessica T. Mathews Testifies Before House Armed Services Committee

Link Copied
Published on Jul 18, 2007

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 18, 2007

- PRESS RELEASE -

Jessica T. Mathews, president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, testified today before the House Armed Services Committee hearing on “Iraq: Trends and Recent Security Developments.” 

“The current conversation in Washington badly distorts what is happening in Iraq and what our options are. As it has from the very beginning, U.S. strategy has more to do with political needs in Washington than with realities on the ground—to our continuing confusion and detriment.”

Mathews offers five key considerations for a fresh approach to the debate on Iraq:

  • The premise of our current strategy—that if violence is reduced, a political solution will follow—is false. What is underway today in Iraq is a natural and inevitable struggle for power. The American presence delays what will eventually happen anyway.
  • The United States has been pursuing the same political goal since 2004 without success.  The present description of the needed next steps as mundane and achievable “benchmarks” is a self-deluding fantasy on our part.
  • A change in political strategy in Iraq and a shift in political attention and economic and military priorities across the region is needed to redefine possible outcomes in Iraq.  Analysis of options must recognize—as it generally does not today—that a significant change in U.S. policy will change the potential for regional cooperation.
  • Assertions being made regarding the implications over the withdrawal of U.S. troops lack significant evidence.  Because the choice we face is among bad options, it is easy to argue against any change in course.  While uncertainties are immense, it is therefore imperative to examine such claims with as much care and knowledge as we can command. 
  • Congress needs to urgently address and end the dangerous charade that has been underway between it and the administration regarding whether the U.S. government is currently planning a permanent presence in Iraq.

###

To read Dr. Mathews’ prepared testimony, go to www.carnegieendowment.org
Direct link to the PDF:
http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/mathews_iraq_testimony1.pdf

To request an interview with Dr. Mathews, please contact Trent Perrotto, 202/939-2372, tperrotto@ceip.org or Jessica Jennings 202/939-2265, jjennings@ceip.org

Biographical Information

Jessica Tuchman Mathews was appointed president of the Endowment in 1997. Her career includes senior positions in the White House, the State Department, the House of Representatives, the Council on Foreign Relations, the World Resources Institute, and the Washington Post.

Dr. Mathews is a director of Somalogic Inc. and a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation, The Century Foundation, and the Nuclear Threat Initiative. She is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. She has previously served on the boards of the Brookings Institution, Radcliffe College, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Surface Transportation Policy Project, and the Joyce Foundation, among others.

More information can be found at: www.carnegieendowment.org/jmathews.

Recent Interviews and Articles

  • “Memo to the next U.S. president” on the future of foreign policy, Charlie Rose, March 29, 2007
  • “Four years later”: The anniversary of the Iraq Invasion, Newshour with Jim Lehrer, March 19, 2007
  • President Bush’s Plan to Boost Troops in Iraq, NPR’s All Things Considered, January 10, 2007
  • Iraq Strategy Casts Shadow Over Gates Hearings, Newshour with Jim Lehrer, December 4, 2006
  • Iraq: What Next? – a January 2003 Carnegie report arguing against immediate military invasion of Iraq due to the civil unrest that would result, recommending instead a continued, multinational inspections process.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is a private, nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cooperation between nations and promoting active international engagement by the United States. Founded in 1910, its work is nonpartisan and dedicated to achieving practical results.  The Endowment has added operations in Beijing, Beirut, and Brussels to its longstanding offices in Washington and Moscow as part of its transformation into the first global think tank.
 

Political ReformForeign PolicyNuclear PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesMiddle EastIraq

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Article
    What Could a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement Do for U.S.-India Ties?

    India and the United States are close to concluding a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement (RDPA) that will allow firms from the two countries to sell to each other’s defense establishments more easily. While this may not remedy the specific grievances both sides may have regarding larger bilateral issues, an RDPA could restore some momentum, following the trade deal announcement.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Commentary
    India Signs the Pax Silica—A Counter to Pax Sinica?

    On the last day of the India AI Impact Summit, India signed Pax Silica, a U.S.-led declaration seemingly focused on semiconductors. While India’s accession to the same was not entirely unforeseen, becoming a signatory nation this quickly was not on the cards either.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Commentary
    NISAR Soars While India-U.S. Tariff Tensions Simmer

    On July 30, 2025, the United States announced 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods. While diplomatic tensions simmered on the trade front, a cosmic calm prevailed at the Sriharikota launch range. Officials from NASA and ISRO were preparing to launch an engineering marvel into space—the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), marking a significant milestone in the India-U.S. bilateral partnership.

      Tejas Bharadwaj

  • Commentary
    TRUST and Tariffs

    The India-U.S. relationship currently appears buffeted between three “Ts”—TRUST, Tariffs, and Trump.

      Arun K. Singh

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.