How is AI reshaping space security, creating governance challenges, and where does international diplomacy stand today?
Tejas Bharadwaj, Almudena Azcárate Ortega
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"United States",
"Caucasus",
"Russia",
"Azerbaijan",
"Armenia",
"Georgia"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}REQUIRED IMAGE
Thomas de Waal, a leading expert on the Caucasus, and Matthew Rojansky, an expert on U.S. and Russian national security and nuclear weapons policies, have joined the Carnegie Endowment’s Russia and Eurasia Program.
WASHINGTON, Feb 24—Thomas de Waal, a leading expert on the Caucasus, and Matthew Rojansky, an expert on U.S. and Russian national security and nuclear weapons policies, have joined the Carnegie Endowment’s Russia and Eurasia Program.
Making the announcement, James Collins, former ambassador to Moscow and director of the Carnegie Russia and Eurasia Program, said:
“With its long-standing center in Moscow, Carnegie is uniquely positioned to guide policy makers and the public on U.S.–Russian relations and developments in Russia, Central Asia, and the Caucasus. We could not be more pleased that Matt and Tom will be contributing their substantive expertise to Carnegie’s work.
“Tom, whose books are essential reading for anyone looking to understand the region, brings an unparalleled knowledge of the Caucasus with the concise analytical skills of a veteran reporter. Matt will combine his critical insight into the national security and nuclear challenges influencing relations between Russia and the United States with his proven ability to engage the policy community and shape the bilateral dialogue.”
De Waal has worked as a journalist, writer, and NGO activist in the Caucasus and Russia. He is the author of Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War (2003), Chechnya: Calamity in the Caucasus (with Carlotta Gall, 1997) and The Caucasus: An Introduction (summer 2010).
De Waal said:
“This is a very exciting opportunity for me to continue my analytical and writing work on the Caucasus under a Carnegie roof. I hope to be able to bring some new ideas to Washington about this often-misunderstood region and Carnegie, with its great reputation for independence and sharp thinking, already feels like a natural home for me as I embark on this.”
Rojansky, who will join the Endowment as deputy director of the program in April, has served as executive director of the Partnership for a Secure America (PSA) since 2007. While at PSA, Rojansky orchestrated high-level bipartisan initiatives aimed at repairing the U.S.–Russia relationship and strengthening the U.S. commitment to nuclear arms control and nonproliferation.
Rojansky said:
“Since coming to Washington, I have worked to bring leaders on both sides of the political aisle together around common sense solutions to our top national security challenges. In my new role at Carnegie, I will seek even greater engagement with policy makers and experts from both parties here in Washington, as well as with political and thought leaders in the region, to advance a productive Euro-Atlantic security dialogue for the 21st century.”
###
NOTES
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
How is AI reshaping space security, creating governance challenges, and where does international diplomacy stand today?
Tejas Bharadwaj, Almudena Azcárate Ortega
After the chill in ties between 2020 and 2024 that brought India–China relations to their lowest point in several decades, the two countries have engaged each other afresh. This paper argues that there are predominantly four imperatives guiding India’s approach to China, and they exist in an order of priority.
Saheb Singh Chadha
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
The U.S.–India semiconductor cooperation story is well-stocked with top-level strategic intent. What remains unresolved, however, are some underlying challenges that will determine whether the cooperation actually functions. Three such friction points stand out.
Shruti Mittal