• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Paul Salem"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Arab Awakening"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [
    "Eurasia in Transition"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "Levant",
    "Syria",
    "Middle East",
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Russia Should Move to Save Syria

Russia has the opportunity to move beyond saving the doomed Syrian regime to save the country itself from civil war and devastation and to bring about a political transition that leads to a stable and democratic Syria.

Link Copied
By Paul Salem
Published on Feb 29, 2012
Project hero Image

Project

Eurasia in Transition

Learn More

Source: Vedomosti

Moscow holds key cards in the complex Syrian crisis. Russia should move beyond saving the doomed regime to save the country itself from civil war and devastation. It can use its influence to bring about a political transition that leads to a stable and democratic Syria. And in so doing Russia will maintain its good relations with Syria and boost its standing and influence in the Middle East.

The Syrian regime is losing the confrontation with its people. It cannot win. Its authoritarian structure is from a bygone era and is falling as other authoritarian regimes have in the region. And its minoritarian backbone is succumbing to the inevitable demographic logic of empowered communities and populations.

With its massive security apparatus and firepower in addition to continued support from Iran and other outside players, the regime can stagger on for a while in the face of a stubborn uprising in which thousands have perished. But Assad and his clique can only prolong the conflict and drive Syria deeper into civil war; meanwhile, the regime is losing ground every week. There is an urgent need for diplomacy that might save Syria from collapsing into chaos.

The Syrian people and opposition are not hostile to Russia or other outside players. They are simply demanding basic human and political rights. The regime has been unable or unwilling to accept the democratic transformation that has erupted in the Arab world in general and in Syria in particular. By turning a blind eye to reality, and falsely assuming that all political problems can be dealt with by force, it has put itself, the Alawi community, and Syria as a whole on a road to ruin.

The recent announcement to hold a referendum in the midst of ongoing massacres and without any prior negotiation with the opposition or consultation with the population only adds insult to injury. Moscow can save the regime from its own miscalculations, and save Syria—and the region—from the terrible devastation of state failure and civil war. And Russia can emerge as a leader of positive change in the Arab world with continued influence in the new Syria and an important position in tomorrow’s Middle East.

The Assad family and the regime’s cronies have painted themselves into a corner: they face victory or death. Victory is proving more impossible every day; the regime clique will soon need an exit strategy. The Alawi community has effectively been taken hostage by the Assad regime in a communal confrontation with the Sunni majority that outnumbers them 7 to 1 and that they cannot beat; the Alawis too need an exit strategy from civil war if they are not to become its victims.

The Syrian opposition, as well as the majority of the Syrian population, seek long-overdue and fundamental political reforms, but they do not want civil war and the ruin of Syria. The all-important middle and merchant classes, which have so far not joined the revolution, have no wish to see their homeland destroyed or broken up into mutually hostile sectarian cantons. They would heartily support a power transition that led to greater democracy.

Russia is the only actor today that can offer a win-win solution to these various players and be the architect of a political transition in Syria that will avoid state failure and civil war while ensuring a transition that is positive and stable.

A “Russian Plan” could have elements of other recent transitions in the Arab world. As the West did in Tunisia and Egypt, Russia could use its influence in Syria to encourage a transition without a collapse of state institutions and national order; and as Saudi Arabia and others did in Yemen, it could encourage this transition while offering an exit strategy for the ruling family and clique.

While the Arab League and the West have failed to find a way forward for Syria, and are proposing political and interventionist initiatives that will probably only deepen the crisis, Moscow has a chance to demonstrate its influence, indispensability, and diplomatic acumen by engineering a safe transition for Syria.

In doing so, it will earn the goodwill of the Syrian people as well as the gratitude of many in the Alawi community and even some in the regime itself who realize that they are on a dead-end road. It will also earn the goodwill of countries in the region that fear that the slow and inevitable collapse of the Syrian regime will create instability for the entire Middle East. It will prove Russia’s responsible and positive role in the world community and the Middle East, making Moscow a key player in the new Arab world.

This article originally appeared in Russian in Vedomosti.

About the Author

Paul Salem

Senior Fellow at the Middle East Institute

Paul Salem is a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute.

    Recent Work

  • Paper
    Iraq’s Tangled Foreign Interests and Relations

      Paul Salem

  • Article
    Bracing for Impact in Syria

      Paul Salem

Paul Salem
Senior Fellow at the Middle East Institute
Paul Salem
Political ReformSecurityForeign PolicyLevantSyriaMiddle EastCaucasusRussia

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Article
    Military Lessons from Operation Sindoor

    The India-Pakistan conflict that played out between May 6 and May 10, 2025, offers several military lessons. This article presents key takeaways from Operation Sindoor and breaks down how India’s preparations shaped the outcome and what more is needed to strengthen future readiness.

      Dinakar Peri

  • Book
    India and the Sovereignty Principle: The Disaggregation Imperative

    This book offers a comprehensive analysis of India's evolving relationship with sovereignty in a complex global order. Moving beyond conventional narratives, it examines how the sovereignty principle shapes India's behavior across four critical domains—from traditional military power to contemporary data governance.

      Rudra Chaudhuri, Nabarun Roy

  • Commentary
    NISAR Soars While India-U.S. Tariff Tensions Simmer

    On July 30, 2025, the United States announced 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods. While diplomatic tensions simmered on the trade front, a cosmic calm prevailed at the Sriharikota launch range. Officials from NASA and ISRO were preparing to launch an engineering marvel into space—the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), marking a significant milestone in the India-U.S. bilateral partnership.

      Tejas Bharadwaj

  • Article
    Hidden Tides: IUU Fishing and Regional Security Dynamics for India

    This article examines the scale and impact of Chinese IUU fishing operations globally and identifies the nature of the challenge posed by IUU fishing in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). It also investigates why existing maritime law and international frameworks have struggled to address this growing threat.

      Ajay Kumar, Charukeshi Bhatt

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.