Maha Yahya
{
"authors": [
"Maha Yahya"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Diwan",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Egypt",
"Gulf",
"Levant",
"Maghreb",
"North America",
"United States",
"Middle East",
"North Africa",
"Palestine",
"Syria"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
Can the Middle East Win?
On the eve of the U.S. election, Carnegie’s Maha Yahya explains what it may mean for the region.
On the eve of election day in the United States, many in the Middle East are wondering what the outcome of the presidential election will mean for the region. Diwan asked Maha Yahya, the director of the Carnegie Middle East Center, for her thoughts in the final hours before voting.
Diwan: Tomorrow, the U.S will hold its presidential election. How do you anticipate that each candidate will address the Middle East?
Maha Yahya (MY): Donald Trump is an isolationist, who believes that America can only be great again if it turns away from the rest of the world. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, is an internationalist who believes that America’s greatness lies precisely in wielding its values and influence across the world in order to address global challenges.
A Clinton win would possibly mean a more assertive U.S. role in the Middle East. However, this does not necessarily imply a more interventionist policy in military terms. Rather, Clinton may be more active by seeking to embrace Gulf countries that are currently feeling sidelined in America’s attentions. One consequence of this is that she may work towards a more cohesive approach in Syria between Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey in arming and supporting the rebels. In the process, she will probably seek to contain Russian President Vladimir Putin’s actions in the region. She may also try to reinvigorate the Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, possibly using former president Bill Clinton as an adviser or mover of negotiations.
Diwan: In specific terms how might Donald Trump be different than her?
MY: A Trump victory will bring with it a dangerous increase in populism and demagogical posturing, which may embolden dictators in the region to do the same. His presidency will be characterized by further disengagement from the Middle East, without a clear agenda for tackling issues such as terrorism or the Islamic State. There will be a greater reliance on Russia in dealing with Middle Eastern crisis and Trump is likely to give dictators such as Bashar al-Assad a new lease on life. If Trump lives up to his promise to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem and recognizes the city as Israel’s capital, the peace process will likely unravel, triggering a third and far more brutal Intifada.
Diwan: Beyond the Middle East, what does the future hold for American power in the world?
MY: A Trump presidency will reduce the considerable leverage and potential of the United States in the world and will entice further populist rhetoric across the globe. With a Clinton victory, in turn, the leverage and status of the United States as a superpower may be rejuvenated. Allies, particularly those in NATO, will breathe a sigh of relief.
About the Author
Director, Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Maha Yahya is director of the Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center, where her research focuses on citizenship, pluralism, and social justice in the aftermath of the Arab uprisings.
- Israel Goes to War with IranCommentary
- Joseph Aoun Has Been Elected President of LebanonCommentary
Maha Yahya
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Diwan
- Hezbollah’s Wartime StrategyCommentary
The party’s objectives involve tying together the Lebanese and Iranian fronts, while surviving militarily and politically at home.
Mohamad Fawaz
- A Mission for Lebanon’s ArmyCommentary
While armed forces commander Rudolph Haykal’s caution is understandable, he is in a position to act, and must.
Michael Young
- Iran Rewrites Its War StrategyCommentary
In an interview, Hamidreza Azizi discusses how Tehran has adapted in real time to the conflict with the United States and Israel.
Michael Young
- Trump’s Plan for Gaza Is Not Irrelevant. It’s Worse.Commentary
The simple conclusion is that the scheme will bring neither peace nor prosperity, but will institutionalize devastation.
Nathan J. Brown
- Israel Strikes Hezbollah’s Muslim Brotherhood-Affiliated AlliesCommentary
The Jamaa al-Islamiyya is the local Lebanese dimension of a broader struggle involving rival regional powers.
Issam Kayssi