Commentary
Thomas de Waal
{
"authors": [
"Thomas de Waal"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Caucasus",
"Georgia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Georgia: Where Now for the National Movement?
Giorgi Margvelashvili, won the presidential election in Georgia with 62 percent of the vote. Second place and 22 percent went to former speaker of parliament, David Bakradze, of the United National Movement. That was quite a disastrous performance from a party which only one year ago was running the country.
Published on Oct 30, 2013
In the end it was all rather comfortable. The favorite, Giorgi Margvelashvili, won the presidential election in Georgia with 62 percent of the vote.
Some of the headlines dwelt on the low turnout of 46 percent. That in itself was a kind of perverse tribute to the democratic process, suggesting that Georgian voters did not see the election as a life-and-death struggle and were achieving Western-style levels of apathy. As the head of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly delegation, Matt Raidma, said, “Essentially, what we observed yesterday was a European election.”
Most of the intrigue in the days before the vote had been on who would win second place.
Former speaker of parliament Nino Burjanadze caused some late excitement with a firebrand campaign in which she openly called for warmer relations with Russia. If she had captured second place, it would have sent a signal that Georgia’s foreign policy orientation was in doubt. Eventually, Burjanadze got 10 percent of the vote and any hopes Moscow may have had of diverting Georgia off course came to nothing.
Second place and 22 percent of the vote went to former speaker of parliament, David Bakradze, of the United National Movement (UNM), Mikheil Saakashvili’s former governing party.
Bakradze himself was easily the best candidate the National Movement could find, the one least tainted by the abuses of the previous government and most ready to talk about reforming the party.
But his performance was not convincing either. An email from a National Movement spin-doctor informed me that the outcome was “solidifying the UNM’s place as the leading opposition force in the country,” while also arguing that the low turnout indicated “declining enthusiasm” for the new governing coalition, Georgian Dream.
Well, a low turnout almost meant fewer votes for Bakradze—to be precise, around 300,000 of them, or less than ten percent of the electorate. That was quite a disastrous performance from a party which only one year ago was running Georgia and predicting that it would stay in power almost indefinitely.
This is probably the wake-up call the UNM needed: a poor result which did not wipe it off the map. Saakashvili must draw the biggest conclusions as he steps down from office after a decade in power. His time truly is over and a colossal work of reinvention is needed to make his party relevant again.
About the Author
Thomas de Waal
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
De Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, specializing in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.
- Europolis, Where Europe Ends
- Taking the Pulse: Is It Time for Europe to Reengage With Belarus?Commentary
Thomas de Waal, ed.
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- Iran’s Woes Aren’t Only DomesticCommentary
The country’s leadership is increasingly uneasy about multiple challenges from the Levant to the South Caucasus.
Armenak Tokmajyan
- Navigating Danger: Syrian Refugees in Lebanon Risk ReturningCommentary
A humanitarian crisis in Lebanon deepens, and Syrian refugees face a perilous choice: remain in a war-torn environment or return to Syria where they risk encountering significant dangers and discrimination. There are significant challenges and risks to their search for safety in Syria.
Haid Haid
- Borders Without a Nation: Syria, Outside Powers, and Open-Ended InstabilityPaper
In Syria’s border regions, changes in demographics, economics, and security mean that an inter-Syrian peace process will require consensus among main regional powers that Syria must remain united, that no one side can be victorious, and that perennial instability threatens the region.
Kheder Khaddour, Armenak Tokmajyan
- Why Tunisia Lost Faith in DemocracyCommentary
For many in the society, the post-Ben Ali years were mainly about successive economic crises and political instability.
Jasmine Khelil
- Gaza and the Revolt in U.S. CollegesCommentary
As students around the United States and Europe protest, the relationship of Western elites with Israel is being redefined.
Michael Young
