• Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Middle East logoCarnegie lettermark logo
LebanonIran
{
  "authors": [
    "Dmitri Trenin"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "Israel",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Civil Society"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

A Message to Israel and a Message from Israel

Vladimir Putin’s respectful message on the passing of former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon proves that to quite a few Russian supporters of a strong state, Israel is the ideal in terms of the cohesion existing between the state and the nation, the effectiveness of and coordination among the military, intelligence and law-enforcement agencies, and defense of its interests.

Link Copied
By Dmitri Trenin
Published on Jan 13, 2014

Vladimir Putin's message last Friday to the Israeli leaders on the passing of former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon spoke about Sharon's "high personal qualities," his efforts "to defend Israel's interests," the "respect he enjoyed with his compatriots," and his cutting a "figure of authority on the world stage." President Putin dispatched State Duma Speaker Sergei Naryshkin to Sharon's funeral.

The language of Putin's condolences and the level of Russia's representation are consonant with what has been heard from Washington and London. Sharon's life and legacy were also extensively and generally positively covered by state-run Russian TV. It is particularly striking because of Sharon's reputation as a tough military commander and a hawkish political leader.

These features, however, may be the key to understanding the respect with which President Putin and Russian government officials usually reserve for the State of Israel. They see the Israelis as serious in both word and deed, united by a strong sense of national solidarity, resolute and confident in their defense of the national interest, capable of standing up to criticism from much of the rest of the world, and—crucially—led by weathered individuals not emasculated by political correctness.

To quite a few Russian gosudarstvenniki, supporters of a strong state, Israel is the ideal in terms of the cohesion existing between the state and the nation, the effectiveness of and coordination among its military, intelligence and law-enforcement agencies, and the defense of its interests in the regional and global context. They also appreciate strong leadership when they see it. For Russia to approach that ideal, however, strong personal leadership is not enough. Rather, the country needs to start building a nation. Greater civic solidarity in exchange for more government accountability would be a good start.

About the Author

Dmitri Trenin

Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center

Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet Space

      Dmitri Trenin

  • Commentary
    What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West Revealed

      Dmitri Trenin

Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Political ReformForeign PolicyCivil SocietyMiddle EastIsraelRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    An Extension Under Fire

    The decision of Lebanon’s parliament may look exceptional, but in reality it is not.

      Issam Kayssi

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Shockwaves Across the Gulf

    The countries in the region are managing the fallout from Iranian strikes in a paradoxical way.

      • Angie Omar

      Angie Omar

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    The U.S. Risks Much, but Gains Little, with Iran

    In an interview, Hassan Mneimneh discusses the ongoing conflict and the myriad miscalculations characterizing it.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    The Greatest Dangers May Lie Ahead

    In an interview, Nicole Grajewski discusses the military dimension of the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Firepower Against Willpower

    In an interview, Naysan Rafati assesses the first week that followed the U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran.

      Michael Young

Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Carnegie Middle East logo, white
  • Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.