Andrei Kolesnikov
{
"authors": [
"Andrei Kolesnikov"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Russia",
"Eastern Europe",
"Ukraine",
"Western Europe",
"France",
"Germany"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
After Minsk, Is Germany Still a Leader?
If Merkel is synonymous with Germany, then German political and diplomatic weight has certainly risen to the height of true European leadership.
Of course, nothing would have happened without Angela Merkel, the most influential European politician of our time. We wouldn’t have seen her and Francois Hollande in Moscow for a weekend blitz, nor would we have witnessed the magical night at the Normandy Four summit in Minsk, which conjures up associations with the Normandie-Niemen operation.
If Merkel is synonymous with Germany, then German political and diplomatic weight has certainly risen to the height of true European leadership. It is telling that Germany and France—two key states with a complicated history of bilateral relations and a baggage of past wars against each other—spearheaded the efforts to save peace in Europe. In fact, the Merkel-Hollande initiative looks quite symbolic and historically relevant in the context of the countries’ track record of military confrontation, as did the roles played by Jean Monnet, Robert Schuman, and Konrad Adenauer. Of similar importance was the French participation in constructing united Europe, which would have been impossible without Germany, and the reunification of Germany, which grew out of the collapse of the Iron Curtain and Berlin Wall.
If #Merkel is synonymous with #Germany, then German political and diplomatic weight has certainly risen.Tweet This
Vladimir Putin was once considered “a German in the Kremlin.” From a psychological and linguistic standpoint, he has an easier time communicating with the West through Germany. Being a responsible and forward-thinking politician, Merkel understands that and has been trying to translate Putin’s “dialect” of Russian into the language understandable to the Europeans. And being the most influential woman in the world, she is bound to share part of her charisma with the rest of Germany.
About the Author
Former Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Kolesnikov was a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.
- How the Putin Regime Subverted the Soviet LegacyCommentary
- Putin’s New Social JusticeCommentary
Andrei Kolesnikov
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- In the Trump Gaza Plan, Diplomatic Failure is SuccessCommentary
By failing to address Palestinian representation, the current process is bound to lead to just another temporary arrangement.
Nathan J. Brown
- Syria’s Mandatory Imperial TribulationCommentary
In an interview, Elizabeth Thompson recalls how the country formulated a liberal constitution in 1920, before being denied by France and Britain.
Michael Young
- Bombing Campaigns Do Not Bring About Democracy. Nor Does Regime Change Without a Plan.Commentary
Just look at Iraq in 1991.
Marwan Muasher
- Iran and the New Geopolitical MomentCommentary
A coalition of states is seeking to avert a U.S. attack, and Israel is in the forefront of their mind.
Michael Young
- Baku Proceeds With Caution as Ethnic Azeris Join Protests in Neighboring IranCommentary
Baku may allow radical nationalists to publicly discuss “reunification” with Azeri Iranians, but the president and key officials prefer not to comment publicly on the protests in Iran.
Bashir Kitachaev