• Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Middle East logoCarnegie lettermark logo
LebanonIran
{
  "authors": [
    "Dmitri Trenin",
    "Ryan Faith",
    "Michal Baranowski",
    "Christopher S. Chivvis"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [
    "Eurasia in Transition"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Russia",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine",
    "Western Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

The US, Russia, and “Hybrid Warfare”

A Russian attack on NATO’s eastern member states was never likely. At the same time, the threat of escalation in eastern Ukraine and the potential for more direct Russian and NATO involvement in the fighting there is a clear and present danger.

Link Copied
By Dmitri Trenin, Ryan Faith, Michal Baranowski, Christopher S. Chivvis
Published on Aug 25, 2015
Project hero Image

Project

Eurasia in Transition

Learn More

Source: KCRW’s To the Point

After years of counterinsurgency in the Middle East, the Pentagon says the biggest threat to U.S. security is Russia. That’s not just because of Russia’s nuclear weapons, it’s “hybrid warfare” of the sort Vladimir Putin is using in eastern Ukraine. U.S. troops are already training to combine counterinsurgency with conventional weapons, street-level fighting, cyber warfare, and propaganda. One very concrete example of that changing strategy took place in the Mojave Desert earlier this month in an exercise called Operation Dragon Spear. The goal is deterring Russia from moving on NATO members Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania—or other members of the former Soviet Union.

Carnegie’s Dmitri Trenin talked to KCRW on this issue. Ryan Faith of the Vice News, Christopher Chivvis of the RAND Corporation, and Michal Baranowski of the German Marshall Fund were also featured, along with host Warren Olney.

Trenin’s key point was that Russia’s attitude toward Ukraine differs fundamentally from its view of the Baltic states and Poland: Ukraine is part of what Putin calls “the Russian world,” while the latter are seen as parts of the Soviet empire that are “lost forever.” There is no reason, therefore, to believe Putin will do to other countries what he has done in Ukraine.

Asked whether NATO’s attempt to shore up its eastern flank would be an effective deterrent toward Russia, Trenin suggested the question missed the mark, because a Russian attack on NATO’s eastern member states was never likely. While acknowledging that history had given eastern Europe reason to fear Russia, Trenin argued that it would be wiser to focus on the threat of escalation in eastern Ukraine—the potential for more direct Russian and NATO involvement in the fighting in Donbas is “a clear and present danger.”

This interview was originally broadcast on KCRW.

About the Authors

Dmitri Trenin

Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center

Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.

Ryan Faith

Michal Baranowski

Christopher Chivvis
Christopher S. Chivvis

Senior Fellow and Director, American Statecraft Program

Christopher S. Chivvis is the director of the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Authors

Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Ryan Faith
Michal Baranowski
Christopher S. Chivvis
Senior Fellow and Director, American Statecraft Program
Christopher S. Chivvis
SecurityMilitaryForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesRussiaEastern EuropeUkraineWestern Europe

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    In the Trump Gaza Plan, Diplomatic Failure is Success

    By failing to address Palestinian representation, the current process is bound to lead to just another temporary arrangement.

      Nathan J. Brown

  • Paper
    Egypt’s Military Landlord Economy and its Limitations

    The armed forces champion a form of capitalism that is generating revenue, but its reliance on rent faces diminishing returns, leaving the country with massive sunk costs and deferred returns, deepening dependency on external borrowing.

      Yezid Sayigh

  • Article
    From Hormuz to the Maghreb: The Geopolitical Reach of a Gulf Crisis

    Morocco and Algeria, each in its own way, are having to navigate the global economic fallout of the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran.

      Yasmine Zarhloule

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    New Syria, Old Lebanon: Absence of the State

    Any move by the United States to make good on Trump’s suggestion that Washington persuade Damascus to confront Hezbollah militarily would have catastrophic consequences. 

      Kheder Khaddour

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Lebanon Should Try to Place Hezbollah on the U.S.-Iran Table

    As talks begin between Washington and Tehran, Beirut has an opening to advance a regional plan for the party’s disarmament.

      Michael Young

Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Carnegie Middle East logo, white
  • Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.