• Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Middle East logoCarnegie lettermark logo
LebanonIran
{
  "authors": [
    "Zaha Hassan",
    "Hallaamal Keir"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Coronavirus"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Middle East",
    "Israel",
    "Palestine",
    "Levant"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other

U.S. Policy Response to Coronavirus in Gaza

The Gaza Strip faces a confluence of poor conditions allowing for rapid coronavirus spread. The United States must help prevent a worsened humanitarian catastrophe.

Link Copied
By Zaha Hassan and Hallaamal Keir
Published on Mar 30, 2020

Background

The two million Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip face insurmountable obstacles in attempting to prevent the novel coronavirus from spreading throughout the isolated enclave. Israel’s continued siege and blockade severely limits their ability to test for the virus and provide healthcare to those who become infected. Now with reports of the first two cases of the virus in Gaza this week, time is running out for Palestinian and Israeli authorities to prevent a catastrophe. The United States has an important role to play, leveraging its relationship with Israel to ensure that Gaza is able to respond to the pandemic.

Israel’s thirteen-year blockade and siege of Gaza decimated healthcare infrastructure and severely restricted access to health services. Suffocating under Israeli restrictions, Gaza’s failing economy has left healthcare systems in Gaza understaffed due to emigration of skilled doctors and subsequent restrictions on movement for health care workers. Such challenges are further compounded by Israeli-imposed customs limitations and its extensive “dual-use” list, which imposes broad restrictions on material imports because their potential military purposes, including those necessary for health care like nuclear scanning technology or materials used in prostheses. With inconsistent access to medical supplies and inadequate staffing, many patients are forced to seek healthcare elsewhere, which is contingent upon receiving an unlikely permit from Israel—in 2018, almost ⅖ of those permit applications were denied. With healthcare infrastructure that is thoroughly unprepared and unequipped to deal with a pandemic and restrictions preventing treatment elsewhere, an outbreak of the coronavirus will be disastrous for Palestinians in Gaza.

Refugees in Gaza, which make up 70 percent of Gaza’s population, face an added challenge: they rely on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) to provide primary care and screening for coronavirus. UNRWA has struggled to meet patient needs for years amid funding shortfalls and cuts in U.S. contributions to the agency under the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. Those cuts have meant a loss of almost a third of its budget. UNRWA already halted food distribution temporarily in Gaza in an attempt to take the necessary precautions against the virus, but its ability to respond to the pandemic will depend on the success of a $14 million flash appeal for funding. Palestinians in densely populated Gaza are at a high risk for both contracting and transmitting the virus. The lack of access to clean water and sanitation in Gaza and the difficulty in practicing social distancing in the close quarters of camps could rapidly increase the virus’s rate of spread.

While responsibility for healthcare provision in the occupied Palestinian territories was transferred to the Palestinian Authority under the Oslo Accords, Israel holds the overarching responsibility to ensure access to quality healthcare as the occupying power under international law. But a global pandemic demands a global response, and the United States in particular holds some responsibility for the situation in Gaza given its political and military support to Israel amounting to $3.8 billion per year. Cuts in U.S. contributions to UNRWA and to Palestinians in the occupied territories have also contributed to the crisis Palestinians are facing.

Recommendations

The Trump administration and U.S. Congress must act now to do the following:

  1. Obligate funding, already appropriated by Congress through the State Department’s Migration and Refugee Assistance and Economic Support Fund accounts, to UNRWA at the previous level of $360 million so that it is adequately resourced to address the growing crisis.
  2. Ensure funding for UNRWA in the 2021 appropriations package so the agency can appropriately address the threat of coronavirus alongside the day-to-day health care needs of Palestinians in Gaza.
  3. Demand that Israel use the lump sum cash transfer of U.S. security assistance to Israel to support Gaza’s response to the coronavirus.
  4. Call on Israel to end the closure and blockade of Gaza and allow for humanitarian aid to enter unfettered.

About the Authors

Zaha Hassan
Zaha Hassan

Senior Fellow, Middle East Program

Zaha Hassan is a human rights lawyer and a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Hallaamal Keir

Former Research Analyst, Middle East Program

Hallaamal Keir was a research analyst in the Middle East Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Authors

Zaha Hassan
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Zaha Hassan
Hallaamal Keir
Former Research Analyst, Middle East Program
Political ReformDemocracyForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesMiddle EastIsraelPalestineLevant

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

  • Article
    From Hormuz to the Maghreb: The Geopolitical Reach of a Gulf Crisis

    Morocco and Algeria, each in its own way, are having to navigate the global economic fallout of the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran.

      Yasmine Zarhloule

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    The West’s Climate Colonialism in the Greater Middle East

    There is a disturbing structural parallel between the old global energy economy and the new green transition.

      • Angie Omar

      Angie Omar

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    New Syria, Old Lebanon: Absence of the State

    Any move by the United States to make good on Trump’s suggestion that Washington persuade Damascus to confront Hezbollah militarily would have catastrophic consequences. 

      Kheder Khaddour

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Lebanon Should Try to Place Hezbollah on the U.S.-Iran Table

    As talks begin between Washington and Tehran, Beirut has an opening to advance a regional plan for the party’s disarmament.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Board Up Donald Trump’s Failed Board of Peace

    What is behind Marco Rubio’s announcement that the body is now an international nongovernmental organization?

      • Zaha Hassan

      Zaha Hassan

Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Carnegie Middle East logo, white
  • Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.