This will be the region’s most representative tournament, amid broad changes in its footballing landscape.
Issam Kayssi
REQUIRED IMAGE
Source: Carnegie Endowment
Summary
The Egyptian government has allowed the religious establishment to increase its control on Egyptian politics and society in an attempt to tighten the influence of more radical Islamist organizations. In this new Carnegie paper, Bassma Kodmani writes a case study on the relationship between religious authority and political authority in Egypt.
Kodmani outlines the motivations, interests, strategies, and agendas of the institutions that represent and speak for Islam and those that represent the state and act in its name. She concludes that, “Conservative Islamic authorities that claim to be nonpolitical are more problematic and dangerous for social progress than legally recognized parties participating in the democratic process would be.” Therefore, in order to secure responsible behavior from the state, the religious establishment, and the citizenry, Kodmani advocates greater space for political parties, including Islamist ones.
Click on link above for the full text of this Carnegie Paper.
About the Author
Bassma Kodmani is an associate professor at the College de France and director of the Arab Reform Initiative. She is an expert on Middle East politics and contributing writer to the Carnegie Endowment’s Middle East Political Reform Initiative (MEPRI).
Bassma Kodmani
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
This will be the region’s most representative tournament, amid broad changes in its footballing landscape.
Issam Kayssi
Cairo’s efforts send a message to the United States and the region that it still has a place at the diplomatic table.
Angie Omar
Just look at Iraq in 1991.
Marwan Muasher
As Iran defends its interests in the region and its regime’s survival, it may push Hezbollah into the abyss.
Michael Young
Without structural reform, the organization, which is racked by internal rivalries, risks sliding into irrelevance.
Hesham Alghannam