• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "South America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Trade Liberalization Provides Modest Benefits for Brazil

A Doha trade agreement or a major trade pact with other developing countries, including China, would provide a small boost to Brazil’s economy.

Link Copied
Published on Apr 10, 2009

WASHINGTON, Apr 9—A Doha trade agreement or a major trade pact with other developing countries, including China, would provide a small boost to Brazil’s economy, according to a new report from the Carnegie Endowment, the International Labour Office, and the UN Development Program.

After eight years of strong growth, Brazil has emerged as a key player in global trade negotiations and an advocate for a greater role for emerging powers in international economic policy making. At the same time, Brazilian policy makers face complex challenges as they try to grow their economy in ways that will increase employment and living standards. Carnegie’s Sandra Polaski and co-authors from the ILO and the UNDP examine the trade policy choices Brazil faces and their impact for household incomes, employment, and production at the national and regional levels.

Key points:

  • Potential gains from each of the trade scenarios are small—less than 0.5 percent improvement in real income.
  • Gains or losses from fluctuations in soy, wheat, and crude oil prices—like those seen in 2007 and 2008—have larger impacts on Brazil’s economy than the trade policy choices examined.
  • The trade scenarios would provide modest gains in employment of unskilled workers, a welcome finding, but could shift workers to agriculture, where wages are lower.
  • Despite concerns to the contrary, strong growth in India and China would slightly increase employment in Brazil.
  • Policy makers should consider additional social safety net measures to help households adapt to the structural changes induced by Brazil’s engagement with the global economy.

The authors conclude:

“As Brazil continues to integrate more deeply into the changing world economy, it is instructive to compare the relative impact of its trade policy choices, as well as the effects of the shocks it may experience as a result of greater integration…. As policy is debated, it is important that the pattern of gains and losses and the resulting adjustment costs be taken fully into account.”

###


AUTHORS

  • Joaquim Bento de Souza Ferreira Filho is a professor in the Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” of the Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
  • Janine Berg is an employment specialist with the International Labour Office, Brasília.
  • Scott McDonald is a professor in the Department of Economics and Strategy, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
  • Sandra Polaski is a senior associate and director of the Trade, Equity, and Development Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C.
  • Karen Thierfelder is a professor in the Economics Department, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland.
  • Dirk Willenbockel is a research fellow at the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton.
  • Eduardo Zepeda is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C., and a senior policy adviser in the Bureau for Development Policy of the United Nations Development Program, New York.

NOTES

  • Direct link to the PDF: www.carnegieendowment.org/files/brazil_global_economy.pdf
  • Direct link to the Portuguese PDF: www.carnegieendowment.org/files/O_Brasil_na_economia_mundial.pdf
  • This study uses computable general equilibrium models to examine the impact of different trade policy choices, including a multilateral agreement in the Doha Round of negotiations at the World Trade Organization and a series of free trade agreements with other developing countries, including India, China, and South Africa.
  • The study also probes the effect of world price volatility for commodities that are important to Brazil and the effects of rapid growth in China and India.
  • The study includes detailed regional information that allows an assessment of the effects on different regions and the potential for cross-regional migration.
  • Unlike most traditional models, the study does not assume full employment, instead reflecting Brazil’s actual unemployment levels.
  • Press Contact: Trent Perrotto, 202/939-2372, tperrotto@ceip.org
     


 

EconomyTradeNorth AmericaSouth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Does Russia Have Enough Soldiers to Keep Waging War Against Ukraine?

    The Russian army is not currently struggling to recruit new contract soldiers, though the number of people willing to go to war for money is dwindling.

      Dmitry Kuznets

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Lithuania’s Potash Dilemma Raises Questions About Sanctions’ Effectiveness

    What should happen when sanctions designed to weaken the Belarusian regime end up enriching and strengthening the Kremlin?  

      Denis Kishinevsky

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Venezuela Is No Oil Eldorado, Despite U.S. and Russian Claims

    Geological complexity and years of mismanagement mean the Venezuelan oil industry is not the big prize officials in Moscow and Washington appear to believe.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Including Russia on the EU Financial Blacklist Will Hurt Ordinary People, Not the Kremlin

    The paradox of the European Commission’s decision is that the main victims will not be those it formally targets. Major Russian businesses associated with the Putin regime have long adapted to sanctions with the help of complex schemes involving third countries, offshore companies, and nonpublic entities.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Didn’t the Ukraine War Turn Russia’s Ruling Class Against Putin?

    A new book by Alexandra Prokopenko looks at why the Russian ruling class became the regime’s willing servants—and how they might fare in a post-Putin world.

      Vladislav Gorin

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.